Creatidy/model-intelligence
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Prove licensed real-source A/B/C value beyond upstream coverage #12

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-04 22:19:25 +00:00 by kilo · 14 comments
kilo commented 2026-10-04 22:19:25 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Parent: #11. Owner: Model Intelligence. G06, G10, G12. Source: shared architecture v1.0 (2026-10-04), applicable section bundle 1–5, 7–10, 12–18; owner's MI brief §4 (mission, reuse, evidence) and §5. Full source file unavailable; reference/hash and interpretation rules are in #11.

Problem and Evidence

At develop fb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef, merged #9/PR #10 contains evidence.py, projection.py, deltas.py and synthetic tests/test_separated_proof.py. That establishes a deterministic architectural experiment, not real market truth or separate-product value. #1 freezes real-source A/B/C and unbiased STOP/GO; #3/PR #4 recorded earlier source-shape research, but its implementation ended STOP_REVISE and must not be reused implicitly. No claim that upstream lacks a feature is proven by our own tests.

Research Result, Scope and Invariants

Answer: do exact current upstream revisions plus a small MI evidence/temporal layer provide demonstrable user value for A model/conflicting benchmark-price evidence, B verified public plan/promotion time/conditions, C official versioned execution-surface evidence? Reuse existing research/proof and challenge duplication; recommend adoption/removal where upstream suffices. Keep #1 gate intact; a recommendation is not an owner GO/STOP decision and does not restart failed temporal experiments.

Acceptance

  1. Evidence ledger pins upstream/source revisions, files or durable capture references, retrieval/effective time, claims and uncertainty; official B/C references and A subject are verified, not inferred from synthetic names.
  2. Separately assess code license, database/data license, API terms, attribution/citation, redistribution and commercial use. Unknown rights prevent publication, not all internal research. No blanket permission from public read access.
  3. Compare models.dev, AI Model Watch, Model Price Watch, pydantic/genai-prices, codingplan and relevant producer/benchmark sources including Artificial Analysis against concrete A/B/C outcomes. Candidates remain candidates until exact semantics/rights/maintenance/security are evidenced; prefer ADOPT → VENDOR/COPY → PORT → ADAPT → BUILD.
  4. Demonstrate conflicts, stale/unknown/withdrawn evidence, future-known revisions, promotion expiry during refresh failure, unknown channel/model and unsupported assertion strength. Network-free regression fixtures may only retain redistributable content; retain existing temporal invariants and original benchmark units/method/version/configuration.
  5. Produce reproducible limited proof artifacts, coverage/duplication comparison and reasoned feasibility/gap/adaptation/STOP recommendation with uncertainty and owner decision criteria. No invented cost/quality/time thresholds; no universal intelligence score. Explain why any own code remains needed.

Integration, Safety and Priority

Producer MI, consumer Router; Kernel indirectly records knowledge reference. Output informs source acquisition and knowledge-publication contracts; real-source scope is chosen before acquisition implementation. Does not define entitlement, routing, credentials, ingestion service, benchmark runner or a new schema. Record diagnostic/documentation implications; no persisted-data migration unless the accepted proof actually changes fixtures, and do not silently change #9 semantics. Priority P1: first establish lawful value before committing to distribution or acquisition machinery.
Future acceptance may need authorized public-source/API access and owner STOP/GO decision. No product inference or runtime effect is needed for this research; paid access/credentials/inference are not authorized by this issue's registration or this session.

Parent: #11. Owner: Model Intelligence. G06, G10, G12. Source: shared architecture v1.0 (2026-10-04), applicable section bundle 1–5, 7–10, 12–18; owner's MI brief §4 (mission, reuse, evidence) and §5. Full source file unavailable; reference/hash and interpretation rules are in #11. ## Problem and Evidence At develop `fb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef`, merged #9/PR #10 contains `evidence.py`, `projection.py`, `deltas.py` and synthetic `tests/test_separated_proof.py`. That establishes a deterministic architectural experiment, not real market truth or separate-product value. #1 freezes real-source A/B/C and unbiased STOP/GO; #3/PR #4 recorded earlier source-shape research, but its implementation ended STOP_REVISE and must not be reused implicitly. No claim that upstream lacks a feature is proven by our own tests. ## Research Result, Scope and Invariants Answer: do exact current upstream revisions plus a small MI evidence/temporal layer provide demonstrable user value for A model/conflicting benchmark-price evidence, B verified public plan/promotion time/conditions, C official versioned execution-surface evidence? Reuse existing research/proof and challenge duplication; recommend adoption/removal where upstream suffices. Keep #1 gate intact; a recommendation is not an owner GO/STOP decision and does not restart failed temporal experiments. ## Acceptance 1. Evidence ledger pins upstream/source revisions, files or durable capture references, retrieval/effective time, claims and uncertainty; official B/C references and A subject are verified, not inferred from synthetic names. 2. Separately assess code license, database/data license, API terms, attribution/citation, redistribution and commercial use. Unknown rights prevent publication, not all internal research. No blanket permission from public read access. 3. Compare models.dev, AI Model Watch, Model Price Watch, pydantic/genai-prices, codingplan and relevant producer/benchmark sources including Artificial Analysis against concrete A/B/C outcomes. Candidates remain candidates until exact semantics/rights/maintenance/security are evidenced; prefer ADOPT → VENDOR/COPY → PORT → ADAPT → BUILD. 4. Demonstrate conflicts, stale/unknown/withdrawn evidence, future-known revisions, promotion expiry during refresh failure, unknown channel/model and unsupported assertion strength. Network-free regression fixtures may only retain redistributable content; retain existing temporal invariants and original benchmark units/method/version/configuration. 5. Produce reproducible limited proof artifacts, coverage/duplication comparison and reasoned feasibility/gap/adaptation/STOP recommendation with uncertainty and owner decision criteria. No invented cost/quality/time thresholds; no universal intelligence score. Explain why any own code remains needed. ## Integration, Safety and Priority Producer MI, consumer Router; Kernel indirectly records knowledge reference. Output informs source acquisition and knowledge-publication contracts; real-source scope is chosen before acquisition implementation. Does not define entitlement, routing, credentials, ingestion service, benchmark runner or a new schema. Record diagnostic/documentation implications; no persisted-data migration unless the accepted proof actually changes fixtures, and do not silently change #9 semantics. Priority P1: first establish lawful value before committing to distribution or acquisition machinery. Future acceptance may need authorized public-source/API access and owner STOP/GO decision. No product inference or runtime effect is needed for this research; paid access/credentials/inference are not authorized by this issue's registration or this session.
kilo commented 2026-10-04 22:22:50 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Deduplication/dependency record for #11: #1 remains the frozen real-source/value decision contract; #9/merged PR #10 already covers the synthetic temporal proof. This task is the missing bounded real-source/rights/value examination, not another synthetic proof. Publication #13 and identity/calibration #14 may investigate contracts in parallel, but production acquisition/publication #15, distribution #18 and installed acceptance #19 depend on lawful accepted value/source scope. Cross-product planning counterparts: Router BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router#173 and Kernel Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#46. Those parents plan consumer work; they do not prove MI integration.

Deduplication/dependency record for #11: #1 remains the frozen real-source/value decision contract; #9/merged PR #10 already covers the synthetic temporal proof. This task is the missing bounded real-source/rights/value examination, not another synthetic proof. Publication #13 and identity/calibration #14 may investigate contracts in parallel, but production acquisition/publication #15, distribution #18 and installed acceptance #19 depend on lawful accepted value/source scope. Cross-product planning counterparts: Router https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/issues/173 and Kernel https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/46. Those parents plan consumer work; they do not prove MI integration.
kilo commented 2026-10-04 22:30:37 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Final public-term/consumer scope matches: Router BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router#176 consumes MI evidence; BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router#184 owns account/access-mode/quota-pool/call-cost enforcement. They must consume proved public applicability without converting unknown into free price or entitlement. MI #12 remains real-source rights/value research; #13/#15 provide semantics/production evidence, not private whole-task accounting.

Final public-term/consumer scope matches: Router https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/issues/176 consumes MI evidence; https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/issues/184 owns account/access-mode/quota-pool/call-cost enforcement. They must consume proved public applicability without converting unknown into free price or entitlement. MI #12 remains real-source rights/value research; #13/#15 provide semantics/production evidence, not private whole-task accounting.
kilo commented 2026-10-04 22:52:28 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Corrected whole-task private economics counterpart is Kernel Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#56; #48 remains lifetime/deadline only. MI #12/#15 prove lawful public terms; Router #184 owns account/call evidence and Kernel #56 whole-task envelopes/unknowns/dedup/recovery. No private quota or guaranteed whole-task price is added to MI.

Corrected whole-task private economics counterpart is Kernel https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/56; #48 remains lifetime/deadline only. MI #12/#15 prove lawful public terms; Router #184 owns account/call evidence and Kernel #56 whole-task envelopes/unknowns/dedup/recovery. No private quota or guaranteed whole-task price is added to MI.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 09:23:47 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

STOP_AND_ASK recorded for explicit owner loop invocation MI-loop-20261005T085020Z. Selected by refreshed full canonical queue: P1 #12/#13/#14 share created_at2026-10-04T22:19:25Z, #12 wins ascending-number tie; no existing implementation PR. Ordinary branch issue-12-real-source-value created from exact current develop 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e; no tracked edits/commits/push/PR/reviewer dispatch or product inference.

Bounded public research establishes feasible subjects but NOT full accepted proof:

  • A official https://docs.z.ai/guides/vlm/glm-5.3-flash.md and release notes verify GLM-5.3-Flash. models.dev f014f106dd414d575de2d0160d91267e2e7cb119 already represents canonical identity/contextual benchmarks; do not rebuild/claim absent coverage. No contemporaneous same-method/configuration benchmark-price conflict established. Producer AA v4.1.1 versus current AA v4.3.2 is context difference, not a fabricated conflict.
  • B https://docs.z.ai/devpack/notice/event-glm-5.3-flash.md explicitly gives September3–October7, SingaporeUTC+8, nightly23:00–09:00, paid-plan/model/channel/ZCode>=3.10 conditions and quota-exhaustion participation limits. It states extension from September20, but no durable predecessor or precise date-end inclusivity/final overnight boundary was obtained. Do not choose an invented expiry instant or multiply subscription rules by API pricing.
  • C ZCode 29628c9acdb81b703bbd4080c207a0e7ce5e276e package3.14.3 has source-supported headless/json/stream-json/model/effort mechanisms, not runtime-observed physical identity/enforcement. Website3.14.4 is not that frozen source. Apache2 first-party LICENSE/NOTICE does not license external website data or prove official-build promotion parity.

Pinned reuse research: AI Model Watch Khavel/ai-model-watch-data@d3441ada9b032c141778bde1aeb740b1f4cd2dff explicitly licenses Data under MIT-style notice terms; Model Price Watch romanshumy/llm-prices-data@3bdbb63401153462baf330460165f92b256e4a1e distinguishes CC-BY4 data and MIT code; genai-prices 36d4e77cc4e8a447f13d63d79326425493268d45 MIT, zai.yml explicitly acknowledges an eight-hour promotion-boundary approximation; codingplan 7a7e43268c8b56f0b0c4ccf2fd5d1581cf2a9c2a MIT secondary plan discovery, not official applicability/entitlement. Code licenses do not automatically clear every third-party input/benchmark.

Rights boundary: Z.ai Terms https://docs.z.ai/legal-agreement/terms-of-use.md updatedApril14 2026, III.4(b)/III.6(e) restrict unauthorized extraction/scraping; V.2 covers identifiers; no express documentation/dataset redistribution license established. Preserve the unauthorized-purpose qualifier: this is NOT a claim that every factual citation is prohibited. AA Data Platform Terms v1.1 https://artificialanalysiscdn.com/legal/ProDataPlatformTerms.pdf restrict raw redistribution/combined external datasets/competing guidance under2.4–2.5; brief attributed non-tabular citations under2.3 are a separate path. No authenticated API used, no external dataset/code imported. Parent PDF re-fetch timed out; restriction finding is from the read-only researcher's successful earlier decoding, not a claimed successful parent fetch.

Recommended owner choice: bounded citation-only ADAPT/limitation packet, exclude uncleared source copies/datasets and make no full-proof/GO claim. This would adapt the proof receipt, not satisfy original real-source fixture/conflict/boundary obligations by assertion. Alternative: retain full acceptance and obtain suitable rights/clarifying source evidence before that publication path; or preserve research as a STOP outcome without separate product continuation. Owner cannot substitute consent for third-party rights. Existing rules prohibit publishing uncleared fixtures and fabricated facts but do not select an acceptance adaptation or product outcome. Await explicit decision; this loop terminates, and an answer alone does not automatically restart it.

Prior issue #11 was separately completed/verified closed after existing owner mergePR20; no develop integration performed by this invocation. Fresh integrated UV_OFFLINE=1 make check PASS47 at base above; not a validation claim for a new #12 implementation.

STOP_AND_ASK recorded for explicit owner loop invocation `MI-loop-20261005T085020Z`. Selected by refreshed full canonical queue: P1 #12/#13/#14 share created_at2026-10-04T22:19:25Z, #12 wins ascending-number tie; no existing implementation PR. Ordinary branch `issue-12-real-source-value` created from exact current develop `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`; no tracked edits/commits/push/PR/reviewer dispatch or product inference. Bounded public research establishes feasible subjects but NOT full accepted proof: - A official `https://docs.z.ai/guides/vlm/glm-5.3-flash.md` and release notes verify GLM-5.3-Flash. models.dev `f014f106dd414d575de2d0160d91267e2e7cb119` already represents canonical identity/contextual benchmarks; do not rebuild/claim absent coverage. No contemporaneous same-method/configuration benchmark-price conflict established. Producer AA v4.1.1 versus current AA v4.3.2 is context difference, not a fabricated conflict. - B `https://docs.z.ai/devpack/notice/event-glm-5.3-flash.md` explicitly gives September3–October7, SingaporeUTC+8, nightly23:00–09:00, paid-plan/model/channel/ZCode>=3.10 conditions and quota-exhaustion participation limits. It states extension from September20, but no durable predecessor or precise date-end inclusivity/final overnight boundary was obtained. Do not choose an invented expiry instant or multiply subscription rules by API pricing. - C ZCode `29628c9acdb81b703bbd4080c207a0e7ce5e276e` package3.14.3 has source-supported headless/json/stream-json/model/effort mechanisms, not runtime-observed physical identity/enforcement. Website3.14.4 is not that frozen source. Apache2 first-party LICENSE/NOTICE does not license external website data or prove official-build promotion parity. Pinned reuse research: AI Model Watch `Khavel/ai-model-watch-data@d3441ada9b032c141778bde1aeb740b1f4cd2dff` explicitly licenses Data under MIT-style notice terms; Model Price Watch `romanshumy/llm-prices-data@3bdbb63401153462baf330460165f92b256e4a1e` distinguishes CC-BY4 data and MIT code; genai-prices `36d4e77cc4e8a447f13d63d79326425493268d45` MIT, zai.yml explicitly acknowledges an eight-hour promotion-boundary approximation; codingplan `7a7e43268c8b56f0b0c4ccf2fd5d1581cf2a9c2a` MIT secondary plan discovery, not official applicability/entitlement. Code licenses do not automatically clear every third-party input/benchmark. Rights boundary: Z.ai Terms `https://docs.z.ai/legal-agreement/terms-of-use.md` updatedApril14 2026, III.4(b)/III.6(e) restrict unauthorized extraction/scraping; V.2 covers identifiers; no express documentation/dataset redistribution license established. Preserve the unauthorized-purpose qualifier: this is NOT a claim that every factual citation is prohibited. AA Data Platform Terms v1.1 `https://artificialanalysiscdn.com/legal/ProDataPlatformTerms.pdf` restrict raw redistribution/combined external datasets/competing guidance under2.4–2.5; brief attributed non-tabular citations under2.3 are a separate path. No authenticated API used, no external dataset/code imported. Parent PDF re-fetch timed out; restriction finding is from the read-only researcher's successful earlier decoding, not a claimed successful parent fetch. Recommended owner choice: bounded citation-only ADAPT/limitation packet, exclude uncleared source copies/datasets and make no full-proof/GO claim. This would adapt the proof receipt, not satisfy original real-source fixture/conflict/boundary obligations by assertion. Alternative: retain full acceptance and obtain suitable rights/clarifying source evidence before that publication path; or preserve research as a STOP outcome without separate product continuation. Owner cannot substitute consent for third-party rights. Existing rules prohibit publishing uncleared fixtures and fabricated facts but do not select an acceptance adaptation or product outcome. Await explicit decision; this loop terminates, and an answer alone does not automatically restart it. Prior issue #11 was separately completed/verified closed after existing owner mergePR20; no develop integration performed by this invocation. Fresh integrated `UV_OFFLINE=1 make check` PASS47 at base above; not a validation claim for a new #12 implementation.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 10:32:02 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Explicit owner continuation received 2026-10-05T10:30:10Z for this issue only, recovering invocation MI-loop-20261005T085020Z and the existing delivery counter (0 reviews; no prior PR).

Final owner decision: Citation-Only ADAPT. Accepted deliverable is a bounded evidence/limitations packet with citations and permitted metadata only. Do not copy or fixture uncleared third-party data. Preserve unresolved redistribution rights, the missing same-context benchmark/price conflict and uncertain campaign terminal boundary. Unsupported original acceptance remains unmet: this decision does NOT declare the full A/B/C proof satisfied, product GO, publication rights or downstream gates passed.

Fresh issue/dependencies/comments and canonical Git revalidated; clean existing issue-12-real-source-value HEAD/base 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e. Delivery will use one scoped PR to develop and bounded fresh native whole-PR review. No #13–#19 implementation, ingestion, release/deployment or merge/issue closure is part of this handoff. Original acceptance/history is retained rather than rewritten.

Explicit owner continuation received 2026-10-05T10:30:10Z for this issue only, recovering invocation `MI-loop-20261005T085020Z` and the existing delivery counter (0 reviews; no prior PR). Final owner decision: Citation-Only ADAPT. Accepted deliverable is a bounded evidence/limitations packet with citations and permitted metadata only. Do not copy or fixture uncleared third-party data. Preserve unresolved redistribution rights, the missing same-context benchmark/price conflict and uncertain campaign terminal boundary. Unsupported original acceptance remains unmet: this decision does NOT declare the full A/B/C proof satisfied, product GO, publication rights or downstream gates passed. Fresh issue/dependencies/comments and canonical Git revalidated; clean existing `issue-12-real-source-value` HEAD/base `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`. Delivery will use one scoped PR to develop and bounded fresh native whole-PR review. No #13–#19 implementation, ingestion, release/deployment or merge/issue closure is part of this handoff. Original acceptance/history is retained rather than rewritten.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 10:39:57 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Citation-Only ADAPT packet delivered for native review in PR #23: #23 (Refs #12), open/unmerged to develop.

Base/merge base 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e; clean pushed HEAD 84c562bf8f4f8a84fc110c578fb20f9321d5082f. Four files: SOURCE_VALUE_REVIEW.md, README/ROADMAP links and status, three offline packet-consistency tests. No product/workflow/packaging/dependency change or copied external source data/code/fixtures. Original AC1/2/3/5 PARTIAL; AC4 UNMET. The missing conflict, uncertain campaign boundary and unresolved redistribution rights remain explicit; no full-proof/product GO/downstream gate claim.

Committed UV_OFFLINE=1 make check PASS50, Ruff/format, strict typing zero diagnostics, locked sync, whitespace; full base delta and clean ancestry/owner authorship/current canonical refs verified. Packaging unchanged, no build claim. Shared delivery ledger recovered from previous STOP_AND_ASK; review count0, fresh whole-PR native review next. Issue remains open; no merge/closure or #13–#19 selection.

Citation-Only ADAPT packet delivered for native review in PR #23: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/model-intelligence/pulls/23 (Refs #12), open/unmerged to develop. Base/merge base `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`; clean pushed HEAD `84c562bf8f4f8a84fc110c578fb20f9321d5082f`. Four files: SOURCE_VALUE_REVIEW.md, README/ROADMAP links and status, three offline packet-consistency tests. No product/workflow/packaging/dependency change or copied external source data/code/fixtures. Original AC1/2/3/5 PARTIAL; AC4 UNMET. The missing conflict, uncertain campaign boundary and unresolved redistribution rights remain explicit; no full-proof/product GO/downstream gate claim. Committed `UV_OFFLINE=1 make check` PASS50, Ruff/format, strict typing zero diagnostics, locked sync, whitespace; full base delta and clean ancestry/owner authorship/current canonical refs verified. Packaging unchanged, no build claim. Shared delivery ledger recovered from previous STOP_AND_ASK; review count0, fresh whole-PR native review next. Issue remains open; no merge/closure or #13–#19 selection.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 10:51:16 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

PR #23 updated on the same branch with normal additive commit fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa; base remains 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e.

First fresh native review at84c562b returned COMMENT with empty local findings and independent PASS50; external-source verification was incomplete under the unchanged reviewer permissions. The bounded packet now explicitly labels all external findings, pins, versions and rights statements UNVERIFIED RESEARCH REPORT, with conditional recommendations awaiting source/rights confirmation. No research attribution is promoted into independently verified facts. A fourth offline guard preserves that boundary. No permissions, scope, source data, runtime code or original acceptance changed.

Corrected full UV_OFFLINE=1 make check PASS51; full two-commit range whitespace, clean status, canonical head/base, owner identity and offline locked environment verified. Delivery counter retains review1; one diagnosed corrected fresh whole-PR review follows, no reset or resumed reviewer. Issue open, PR open/unmerged; unsupported full-proof criteria and downstream gates remain unmet. No independent approval currently claimed.

PR #23 updated on the same branch with normal additive commit `fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa`; base remains `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`. First fresh native review at84c562b returned COMMENT with empty local findings and independent PASS50; external-source verification was incomplete under the unchanged reviewer permissions. The bounded packet now explicitly labels all external findings, pins, versions and rights statements UNVERIFIED RESEARCH REPORT, with conditional recommendations awaiting source/rights confirmation. No research attribution is promoted into independently verified facts. A fourth offline guard preserves that boundary. No permissions, scope, source data, runtime code or original acceptance changed. Corrected full `UV_OFFLINE=1 make check` PASS51; full two-commit range whitespace, clean status, canonical head/base, owner identity and offline locked environment verified. Delivery counter retains review1; one diagnosed corrected fresh whole-PR review follows, no reset or resumed reviewer. Issue open, PR open/unmerged; unsupported full-proof criteria and downstream gates remain unmet. No independent approval currently claimed.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 10:57:24 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

READY_TO_MERGE for the bounded Citation-Only ADAPT packet only: PR #23 #23 remains OPEN/UNMERGED to develop; this issue remains OPEN with unsupported original acceptance unmet.

Fresh native whole-PR review ordinal2, task ses_ef44edbfaffeLqbM6gHiLFEvtg, returned exact structured APPROVE with empty findings at HEAD fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa, base/merge base 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e. Reviewer independently ran UV_OFFLINE=1 make check PASS51, zero typing diagnostics, lint/format/locked sync/whitespace and complete four-file/two-commit scope checks. Final parent canonical fetch/MCP/local clean checkout match those exact objects. This is a native verdict, not formal Forgejo review publication.

Review ledger retained: ordinal1 COMMENT at 84c562bf8f4f8a84fc110c578fb20f9321d5082f / same base; normal additive correction fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa; ordinal2 APPROVE. Two reviews total, no counter reset, resumed reviewer, self-review or permission expansion.

All external findings/pins/versions/rights remain UNVERIFIED RESEARCH REPORT. Reviewer did not retrieve external source objects or validate citation availability under its unchanged allowlist; approval is for truthful attribution/limitations documentation, not external source truth. AC1/2/3/5 remain PARTIAL; AC4 UNMET. Unresolved redistribution rights, missing same-context conflict and uncertain campaign end remain explicit; no data/fixture/code copying, full proof, product GO, downstream value gate, issue completion, #13–#19 implementation, inference, release/deployment or merge. No packaging changes/build claimed.

Two ordinary Adrian-authored commits pushed on the same clean issue branch. Excluded shared delivery ledger and prior decision history preserved. The scoped resumed implementation/review delivery ends at this unmerged handoff.

READY_TO_MERGE for the bounded Citation-Only ADAPT packet only: PR #23 https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/model-intelligence/pulls/23 remains OPEN/UNMERGED to develop; this issue remains OPEN with unsupported original acceptance unmet. Fresh native whole-PR review ordinal2, task `ses_ef44edbfaffeLqbM6gHiLFEvtg`, returned exact structured APPROVE with empty findings at HEAD `fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa`, base/merge base `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`. Reviewer independently ran `UV_OFFLINE=1 make check` PASS51, zero typing diagnostics, lint/format/locked sync/whitespace and complete four-file/two-commit scope checks. Final parent canonical fetch/MCP/local clean checkout match those exact objects. This is a native verdict, not formal Forgejo review publication. Review ledger retained: ordinal1 COMMENT at `84c562bf8f4f8a84fc110c578fb20f9321d5082f` / same base; normal additive correction `fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa`; ordinal2 APPROVE. Two reviews total, no counter reset, resumed reviewer, self-review or permission expansion. All external findings/pins/versions/rights remain UNVERIFIED RESEARCH REPORT. Reviewer did not retrieve external source objects or validate citation availability under its unchanged allowlist; approval is for truthful attribution/limitations documentation, not external source truth. AC1/2/3/5 remain PARTIAL; AC4 UNMET. Unresolved redistribution rights, missing same-context conflict and uncertain campaign end remain explicit; no data/fixture/code copying, full proof, product GO, downstream value gate, issue completion, #13–#19 implementation, inference, release/deployment or merge. No packaging changes/build claimed. Two ordinary Adrian-authored commits pushed on the same clean issue branch. Excluded shared delivery ledger and prior decision history preserved. The scoped resumed implementation/review delivery ends at this unmerged handoff.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 12:50:34 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Owner CHANGES_REQUIRED received 2026-10-05T12:48:05Z for existing PR #23; no merge, keep issue open. Previous bounded-packet readiness atfb7542a is superseded for this delivery, while its review/history remains recorded. Same review counter retained: 2 of maximum10 invocations already used.

Revised accepted analysis must answer material value beyond upstream and exact MI ownership. Compare actual models.dev/other serious coverage with concrete Router information needs and real examples. Separate upstream reference/fetch, MI normalization, MI public history, and Router-local account/selection/telemetry responsibilities. Evaluate provenance/history/conflicts/snapshots as operational benefits, explicitly challenge thin-layer versus Router-only alternatives, and finish with a supported GO/ADAPT/STOP recommendation and exact scope.

Owner clarification: an artificial same-context benchmark/price conflict is not a viability prerequisite; unknown campaign boundaries and contradictory facts are normal domain states. Discuss licensing only for implementation options that actually copy/redistribute third-party datasets, not as a generalized gate on observing/citing public facts. No source-data copying, product ingestion, #13–#19 implementation, release/deployment or merge authorized. The product recommendation remains analysis, not automatic owner GO or issue completion.

Current clean branch issue-12-real-source-value, HEAD fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa, canonical base 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e. Bounded read-only source/consumer research, substantive documentation rework and fresh whole-PR review follow on this same PR.

Owner CHANGES_REQUIRED received 2026-10-05T12:48:05Z for existing PR #23; no merge, keep issue open. Previous bounded-packet readiness atfb7542a is superseded for this delivery, while its review/history remains recorded. Same review counter retained: 2 of maximum10 invocations already used. Revised accepted analysis must answer material value beyond upstream and exact MI ownership. Compare actual models.dev/other serious coverage with concrete Router information needs and real examples. Separate upstream reference/fetch, MI normalization, MI public history, and Router-local account/selection/telemetry responsibilities. Evaluate provenance/history/conflicts/snapshots as operational benefits, explicitly challenge thin-layer versus Router-only alternatives, and finish with a supported GO/ADAPT/STOP recommendation and exact scope. Owner clarification: an artificial same-context benchmark/price conflict is not a viability prerequisite; unknown campaign boundaries and contradictory facts are normal domain states. Discuss licensing only for implementation options that actually copy/redistribute third-party datasets, not as a generalized gate on observing/citing public facts. No source-data copying, product ingestion, #13–#19 implementation, release/deployment or merge authorized. The product recommendation remains analysis, not automatic owner GO or issue completion. Current clean branch `issue-12-real-source-value`, HEAD `fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa`, canonical base `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`. Bounded read-only source/consumer research, substantive documentation rework and fresh whole-PR review follow on this same PR.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 13:17:08 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Substantive CHANGES_REQUIRED remediation pushed to same PR #23 as normal additive commit bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf; base/merge base 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e. PR and issue remain OPEN; NO MERGE.

Product-first analysis now compares actual models.dev schema/generator/API joins/native controls/contextual benchmarks, genai valuation/history/conditions, AI Model Watch lifecycle, Model Price Watch history/corrections/scheduled changes and codingplan contextual derivations. No false global claim that upstream lacks history, benchmark context or promotions. Six source-backed public cases: aliases/stale guides; plan generations/economic basis; conditional campaign/uncertain end; surface availability/capability and coverage removal vs retirement; scoped thinking disagreement; version/build-supported vs physical execution.

Concrete responsibility split and operational provenance/time/conflict/snapshot analysis test direct-upstream/Router-local versus thin MI versus broad service. Conclusion: ADAPT to shared public meaning/applicability annotations, selected public interpretation history and recognizable cross-source cuts, reusing upstream catalog/history/calculators. Private inventory/entitlement/accounting/calibration/admission/runtime enforcement stays Router-local; broad service GO not justified; Router-only STOP remains credible where annotations need not be shared. This is a recommendation, not owner product GO or downstream implementation acceptance.

Owner clarification retained: benchmark conflict not viability prerequisite; unknown dates/conflicts normal states, no invented exact end or runtime identity; rights questions limited to concrete copying/redistribution routes rather than ordinary cited facts. No third-party datasets/code/fixtures copied and no functional/product/packaging/workflow permission changes.

Focused four structural/citation/ownership/boundary guards PASS; UV_OFFLINE=1 make check PASS51 including locked sync, Ruff/format, basedpyright zero diagnostics, all offline tests and whitespace. Exact full-base/remediation diff, owner identity, clean checkout and canonical head verified. Router external inspection read committed local6c337a4 only, preserving four pre-existing dirty files; no external mutations/runtime/tests/credentials. Mutable source capture, installed benefit and maintenance/consumer-demand measurements remain explicit limitations, not artificial viability failures.

Recovered review counter remains2; next fresh whole-PR dispatch ordinal3/maximum10. Prior approvalfb7542a is historical and cannot approve current product analysis. PR title/body now reflects latest owner mandate; new independent verdict pending.

Substantive CHANGES_REQUIRED remediation pushed to same PR #23 as normal additive commit `bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf`; base/merge base `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`. PR and issue remain OPEN; NO MERGE. Product-first analysis now compares actual models.dev schema/generator/API joins/native controls/contextual benchmarks, genai valuation/history/conditions, AI Model Watch lifecycle, Model Price Watch history/corrections/scheduled changes and codingplan contextual derivations. No false global claim that upstream lacks history, benchmark context or promotions. Six source-backed public cases: aliases/stale guides; plan generations/economic basis; conditional campaign/uncertain end; surface availability/capability and coverage removal vs retirement; scoped thinking disagreement; version/build-supported vs physical execution. Concrete responsibility split and operational provenance/time/conflict/snapshot analysis test direct-upstream/Router-local versus thin MI versus broad service. Conclusion: ADAPT to shared public meaning/applicability annotations, selected public interpretation history and recognizable cross-source cuts, reusing upstream catalog/history/calculators. Private inventory/entitlement/accounting/calibration/admission/runtime enforcement stays Router-local; broad service GO not justified; Router-only STOP remains credible where annotations need not be shared. This is a recommendation, not owner product GO or downstream implementation acceptance. Owner clarification retained: benchmark conflict not viability prerequisite; unknown dates/conflicts normal states, no invented exact end or runtime identity; rights questions limited to concrete copying/redistribution routes rather than ordinary cited facts. No third-party datasets/code/fixtures copied and no functional/product/packaging/workflow permission changes. Focused four structural/citation/ownership/boundary guards PASS; `UV_OFFLINE=1 make check` PASS51 including locked sync, Ruff/format, basedpyright zero diagnostics, all offline tests and whitespace. Exact full-base/remediation diff, owner identity, clean checkout and canonical head verified. Router external inspection read committed local6c337a4 only, preserving four pre-existing dirty files; no external mutations/runtime/tests/credentials. Mutable source capture, installed benefit and maintenance/consumer-demand measurements remain explicit limitations, not artificial viability failures. Recovered review counter remains2; next fresh whole-PR dispatch ordinal3/maximum10. Prior approvalfb7542a is historical and cannot approve current product analysis. PR title/body now reflects latest owner mandate; new independent verdict pending.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 13:24:15 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

BLOCKED after fresh whole-PR review ordinal3; issue #12 remains OPEN and PR #23 OPEN/UNMERGED. Substantive product rework is preserved at pushed clean HEAD bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf.

New analysis recommendation is ADAPT: upstream-backed shared public meaning/applicability annotations, selected interpretation history and cross-source references, not broad catalog/pricing/history service. Real cited examples and actual upstream coverage/Router-owned source boundaries support that recommendation; direct-upstream+Router adapters remain a credible STOP alternative. Ordinary public facts are not generalized legal-gated; uncertain ends/conflicts remain valid domain states. This is not owner GO or full-proof/consumer acceptance.

Fresh native task ses_ef3c932d1ffeQAZzvp5KS4XgHC returned COMMENT, empty local findings, independently PASS51 at reviewed HEADbc9b9f4 and reviewed base/merge base 013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e. During review canonical develop advanced to ac674e535482b762812473c30a5f83dfd3beb038, corroborated by final MCP/Git and parent re-fetch. The result cannot approve the changed current base. No branch reconciliation or stale approval used.

The unchanged reviewer allowlist also prevented independent retrieval of external upstream Git/documents/Router source; current real-source comparison therefore remains uncorroborated by that review. This is a finite review-access/currentness blocker, not a claim the research is wrong or a reason to downgrade back to a shallow packet. No independent product-value approval is claimed. Do not merge; future current-range independent review with sufficient source evidence is outstanding.

Same invocation MI-loop-20261005T085020Z / counter3of10 retained: review1 COMMENT HEAD 84c562bf8f4f8a84fc110c578fb20f9321d5082f; review2 historical APPROVE HEAD fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa; review3 COMMENT HEAD bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf; all reviewed frozen base013cbb4. No further dispatch/permission expansion, resumed reviewer, self-approval, counter reset or source copying.

Parent and reviewer UV_OFFLINE=1 make check PASS51 atbc9b9f4, full range/clean status validated; these validate local consistency, not external source truth. Four intended files, production/temporal/workflow/packaging unchanged. No #13–#19 implementation, Router operation or external mutation, inference, release/deployment, merge or closure. Excluded ledger retains owner mandate, research, normal additive commit and review3 result.

BLOCKED after fresh whole-PR review ordinal3; issue #12 remains OPEN and PR #23 OPEN/UNMERGED. Substantive product rework is preserved at pushed clean HEAD `bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf`. New analysis recommendation is ADAPT: upstream-backed shared public meaning/applicability annotations, selected interpretation history and cross-source references, not broad catalog/pricing/history service. Real cited examples and actual upstream coverage/Router-owned source boundaries support that recommendation; direct-upstream+Router adapters remain a credible STOP alternative. Ordinary public facts are not generalized legal-gated; uncertain ends/conflicts remain valid domain states. This is not owner GO or full-proof/consumer acceptance. Fresh native task `ses_ef3c932d1ffeQAZzvp5KS4XgHC` returned COMMENT, empty local findings, independently PASS51 at reviewed HEADbc9b9f4 and reviewed base/merge base `013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e`. During review canonical develop advanced to `ac674e535482b762812473c30a5f83dfd3beb038`, corroborated by final MCP/Git and parent re-fetch. The result cannot approve the changed current base. No branch reconciliation or stale approval used. The unchanged reviewer allowlist also prevented independent retrieval of external upstream Git/documents/Router source; current real-source comparison therefore remains uncorroborated by that review. This is a finite review-access/currentness blocker, not a claim the research is wrong or a reason to downgrade back to a shallow packet. No independent product-value approval is claimed. Do not merge; future current-range independent review with sufficient source evidence is outstanding. Same invocation MI-loop-20261005T085020Z / counter3of10 retained: review1 COMMENT HEAD `84c562bf8f4f8a84fc110c578fb20f9321d5082f`; review2 historical APPROVE HEAD `fb7542a25cc46c0eced65b2892dc39b99477e5aa`; review3 COMMENT HEAD `bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf`; all reviewed frozen base013cbb4. No further dispatch/permission expansion, resumed reviewer, self-approval, counter reset or source copying. Parent and reviewer `UV_OFFLINE=1 make check` PASS51 atbc9b9f4, full range/clean status validated; these validate local consistency, not external source truth. Four intended files, production/temporal/workflow/packaging unchanged. No #13–#19 implementation, Router operation or external mutation, inference, release/deployment, merge or closure. Excluded ledger retains owner mandate, research, normal additive commit and review3 result.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 13:56:00 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Explicit owner loop continuation received2026-10-05T13:52:04Z; same delivery/PR/counter retained (ordinals1–3 consumed). Current canonical PRHEADbc9b9f4/baseac674e5 still match the reported state. Both obstacles are Class-A engineering/currentness, not owner decisions.

Checkout already contains Adrian-authored merge db3ea342423a2ff84c2e92eef2bd8ea7110d24b8 with parents bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf + ac674e535482b762812473c30a5f83dfd3beb038. It leaves the product analysis/production/packaging files unchanged and yields the same four-file PR delta against current develop. Preserve this existing integration rather than rewrite owner history; validate and publish normally.

Source-access remediation will use an authorized fresh independent native whole-PR path under rule50, capable of read-only public-source/pin inspection; no weakening of reviewer permissions, source verification, acceptance, or independence. Prepare allowlisted synthetic validation environment. Reserve ordinal4 before dispatch; no counter reset, replacement PR, rebase/force-push or owner relay.

Latest owner continuation supersedes previous no-merge handoff only through the existing exact-APPROVE/empty-findings/validation/currentness loop gates. If those gates pass, continue supported PR merge and verify integrated accepted product-analysis delivery before appropriate issue completion. The recommendation is not product GO, installed runtime proof, source truth by tests or #13–#19 implementation. No additional owner gate is invented and no broader scope selected.

Explicit owner loop continuation received2026-10-05T13:52:04Z; same delivery/PR/counter retained (ordinals1–3 consumed). Current canonical PRHEADbc9b9f4/baseac674e5 still match the reported state. Both obstacles are Class-A engineering/currentness, not owner decisions. Checkout already contains Adrian-authored merge `db3ea342423a2ff84c2e92eef2bd8ea7110d24b8` with parents `bc9b9f4ae7f3cb99004548a046652daeab011ddf` + `ac674e535482b762812473c30a5f83dfd3beb038`. It leaves the product analysis/production/packaging files unchanged and yields the same four-file PR delta against current develop. Preserve this existing integration rather than rewrite owner history; validate and publish normally. Source-access remediation will use an authorized fresh independent native whole-PR path under rule50, capable of read-only public-source/pin inspection; no weakening of reviewer permissions, source verification, acceptance, or independence. Prepare allowlisted synthetic validation environment. Reserve ordinal4 before dispatch; no counter reset, replacement PR, rebase/force-push or owner relay. Latest owner continuation supersedes previous no-merge handoff only through the existing exact-APPROVE/empty-findings/validation/currentness loop gates. If those gates pass, continue supported PR merge and verify integrated accepted product-analysis delivery before appropriate issue completion. The recommendation is not product GO, installed runtime proof, source truth by tests or #13–#19 implementation. No additional owner gate is invented and no broader scope selected.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 14:14:37 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Verified completion of the owner-revised issue #12 product-analysis delivery under invocation MI-loop-20261005T085020Z, following explicit continuation2026-10-05T13:52:04Z. No additional owner gate imposed.

PR #23 merged through supported Forgejo MCP, style merge, without force/auto-merge/branch deletion, at2026-10-05T14:12:52Z. Recorded merge e5479a68e421239cf99e7ec0ac38f9ec23ed9767; exact parents approved base ac674e535482b762812473c30a5f83dfd3beb038 and reviewed HEAD db3ea342423a2ff84c2e92eef2bd8ea7110d24b8. Fresh MCP/Git verifies merged state, merge in canonical develop, base/head ancestry and integrated tree identical to accepted candidate. Preserved owner's develop-integration commit/history; no rebase/force-push/replacement PR.

Fresh independent native equivalent reviewer under rule50, task ses_ef3a23d01ffe8RXEYALPk7jpoy, returned exact structured APPROVE with empty findings atdb3ea34/ac674e5. It independently inspected pinned models.dev schema/generator/API/GLM/plan files, genai matching/conditions/snapshots, AMW lifecycle/nulls, MPW correction/scheduled/Rerank history, codingplan methods/configuration, official Z.ai aliases/plans/campaign/thinking/capabilities, exact ZCode source/build boundary and Router committed6c337a4 source/contracts. Source-path/line provenance is in the native receipt; the previously reported MPW capture404 was independently reproduced and retained as a disclosed limit. No implementer research report substituted for verification or reviewer permissions changed.

Parent and independent reviewer sanitized make check PASS55: explicit env-i allowlist/synthetic HOME/cache/temp, offline locked sync, Ruff lint/format, basedpyright0, all offline tests, unstaged/staged and frozen-range whitespace. Exact canonical/currentness/clean-status gates passed before merge; integrated tree equality verifies the accepted analysis/tests are present unchanged. Substantive files: SOURCE_VALUE_REVIEW.md, README.md, ROADMAP.md, tests/test_source_review.py. No production/packaging/dependency or temporal-semantic changes.

Integrated acceptance is the owner's revised product question, not fabricated fixture availability: actual upstream reuse coverage, concrete Router public gaps/private ownership, six real examples, reference/normalization/selected-history/Router-local split, operational provenance/history/conflict/cut analysis, credible upstream/Router-only alternatives and explicit ADAPT recommendation with exact narrow scope. Unknown dates and conflicts are normal states; no artificial benchmark-conflict viability or generalized legal gate on cited facts. The accepted recommendation is a thin shared public-evidence/applicability and selected-history layer, not broad-product GO or another catalog/calculator/service.

Closing this accepted analysis delivery after verified merge/acceptance only. Full original A/B/C proof, production GO, installed consumer/runtime behavior, any future dataset-copying clearance and downstream #13–#19 implementations remain unclaimed/unselected. Mutable pages lack durable captures and maintenance/independent consumer benefit remains unmeasured. No inference, Router operation, external repo mutation, main, release or deployment.

Review counter preserved4of10: ordinal1 COMMENT84c562b; ordinal2 historical APPROVEfb7542a; ordinal3 COMMENTbc9b9f4; ordinal4 current APPROVEdb3ea34/ac674e5. Both Class-A currentness/source-access obstacles resolved through actual changed engineering paths; no reset/resumed reviewer/self-approval.

Verified completion of the owner-revised issue #12 product-analysis delivery under invocation `MI-loop-20261005T085020Z`, following explicit continuation2026-10-05T13:52:04Z. No additional owner gate imposed. PR #23 merged through supported Forgejo MCP, style merge, without force/auto-merge/branch deletion, at2026-10-05T14:12:52Z. Recorded merge `e5479a68e421239cf99e7ec0ac38f9ec23ed9767`; exact parents approved base `ac674e535482b762812473c30a5f83dfd3beb038` and reviewed HEAD `db3ea342423a2ff84c2e92eef2bd8ea7110d24b8`. Fresh MCP/Git verifies merged state, merge in canonical develop, base/head ancestry and integrated tree identical to accepted candidate. Preserved owner's develop-integration commit/history; no rebase/force-push/replacement PR. Fresh independent native equivalent reviewer under rule50, task `ses_ef3a23d01ffe8RXEYALPk7jpoy`, returned exact structured APPROVE with empty findings atdb3ea34/ac674e5. It independently inspected pinned models.dev schema/generator/API/GLM/plan files, genai matching/conditions/snapshots, AMW lifecycle/nulls, MPW correction/scheduled/Rerank history, codingplan methods/configuration, official Z.ai aliases/plans/campaign/thinking/capabilities, exact ZCode source/build boundary and Router committed6c337a4 source/contracts. Source-path/line provenance is in the native receipt; the previously reported MPW capture404 was independently reproduced and retained as a disclosed limit. No implementer research report substituted for verification or reviewer permissions changed. Parent and independent reviewer sanitized `make check` PASS55: explicit env-i allowlist/synthetic HOME/cache/temp, offline locked sync, Ruff lint/format, basedpyright0, all offline tests, unstaged/staged and frozen-range whitespace. Exact canonical/currentness/clean-status gates passed before merge; integrated tree equality verifies the accepted analysis/tests are present unchanged. Substantive files: SOURCE_VALUE_REVIEW.md, README.md, ROADMAP.md, tests/test_source_review.py. No production/packaging/dependency or temporal-semantic changes. Integrated acceptance is the owner's revised product question, not fabricated fixture availability: actual upstream reuse coverage, concrete Router public gaps/private ownership, six real examples, reference/normalization/selected-history/Router-local split, operational provenance/history/conflict/cut analysis, credible upstream/Router-only alternatives and explicit ADAPT recommendation with exact narrow scope. Unknown dates and conflicts are normal states; no artificial benchmark-conflict viability or generalized legal gate on cited facts. The accepted recommendation is a thin shared public-evidence/applicability and selected-history layer, not broad-product GO or another catalog/calculator/service. Closing this accepted analysis delivery after verified merge/acceptance only. Full original A/B/C proof, production GO, installed consumer/runtime behavior, any future dataset-copying clearance and downstream #13–#19 implementations remain unclaimed/unselected. Mutable pages lack durable captures and maintenance/independent consumer benefit remains unmeasured. No inference, Router operation, external repo mutation, main, release or deployment. Review counter preserved4of10: ordinal1 COMMENT84c562b; ordinal2 historical APPROVEfb7542a; ordinal3 COMMENTbc9b9f4; ordinal4 current APPROVEdb3ea34/ac674e5. Both Class-A currentness/source-access obstacles resolved through actual changed engineering paths; no reset/resumed reviewer/self-approval.
kilo closed this issue 2026-10-05 14:14:48 +00:00
kilo commented 2026-10-05 14:50:03 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Owner-authorized post-merge documentation housekeeping integrated without reopening this issue. Follow-up PR #25 merged2026-10-05T14:47:48Z as a8df6c4f3773e6bfa7644b3f5ce49128c3401c0e, exact parents base e5479a68e421239cf99e7ec0ac38f9ec23ed9767 and reviewed cleanup HEAD b0f5fa25590242221bdf6f7fd8ca8bc769454b44. Fresh MCP/Git verifies merge, approved ancestry and integrated tree equality; same checkout safely fast-forwarded to current develop.

README, ROADMAP, ARCHITECTURE and SOURCE_VALUE_REVIEW now consistently state closed/completed #12, merged PR #23, and accepted ADAPT to a thin upstream-backed public-evidence and selected-history layer. Stale open/unmerged/pending-ADAPT/recomplete12 directions are removed. Existing documentation guards now prevent that regression. Remaining implementation stays in the backlog; no product GO, full A/B/C proof or installed MI-Router acceptance claimed. No production/schema/packaging/dependency/temporal/workflow/permission changes and no dataset copying.

Same invocation/counter preserved6of10: original ordinals1–4 retained; ordinal5 COMMENT due to reviewer isolation exposure (no delivered findings), followed by tracked-only-search remediation; ordinal6 fresh ses_ef37d0b1fffeA37Dt5LcDbMt7H exact APPROVE/findings[] atb0f5fa2/e5479a6. Independent whole-five-file delta, canonical completion and source boundaries verified; sanitized make check PASS55, zero typing diagnostics, lint/format/lock/whitespace. No resumed reviewer, parent self-review, permission weakening or counter reset.

Cleanup Class-A defect is resolved under owner continuation2026-10-05T14:24:03Z. Issue #12 remains closed and PR #23 remains merged. Normal loop selection now resumes from a fresh complete canonical queue; this comment does not select a downstream issue, reopen the research or invent an owner housekeeping gate.

Owner-authorized post-merge documentation housekeeping integrated without reopening this issue. Follow-up PR #25 merged2026-10-05T14:47:48Z as `a8df6c4f3773e6bfa7644b3f5ce49128c3401c0e`, exact parents base `e5479a68e421239cf99e7ec0ac38f9ec23ed9767` and reviewed cleanup HEAD `b0f5fa25590242221bdf6f7fd8ca8bc769454b44`. Fresh MCP/Git verifies merge, approved ancestry and integrated tree equality; same checkout safely fast-forwarded to current develop. README, ROADMAP, ARCHITECTURE and SOURCE_VALUE_REVIEW now consistently state closed/completed #12, merged PR #23, and accepted ADAPT to a thin upstream-backed public-evidence and selected-history layer. Stale open/unmerged/pending-ADAPT/recomplete12 directions are removed. Existing documentation guards now prevent that regression. Remaining implementation stays in the backlog; no product GO, full A/B/C proof or installed MI-Router acceptance claimed. No production/schema/packaging/dependency/temporal/workflow/permission changes and no dataset copying. Same invocation/counter preserved6of10: original ordinals1–4 retained; ordinal5 COMMENT due to reviewer isolation exposure (no delivered findings), followed by tracked-only-search remediation; ordinal6 fresh `ses_ef37d0b1fffeA37Dt5LcDbMt7H` exact APPROVE/findings[] atb0f5fa2/e5479a6. Independent whole-five-file delta, canonical completion and source boundaries verified; sanitized make check PASS55, zero typing diagnostics, lint/format/lock/whitespace. No resumed reviewer, parent self-review, permission weakening or counter reset. Cleanup Class-A defect is resolved under owner continuation2026-10-05T14:24:03Z. Issue #12 remains closed and PR #23 remains merged. Normal loop selection now resumes from a fresh complete canonical queue; this comment does not select a downstream issue, reopen the research or invent an owner housekeeping gate.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
develop
issue-47-terminal-bench-evidence-isolated
issue-45-coding-benchmark-evidence
issue-43-zai-source-refresh
issue-19-installed-router
docs/conversational-review-policy
issue-18-public-distribution
issue-16-offline-operator-contract
issue-15-public-evidence-producer
issue-17-sharing-decision
issue-14-status-consistency
issue-14-capability-boundary
issue-29-post-selection-gates
issue-13-completion-docs
issue-13-publication-contract
issue-12-post-merge-docs
issue-12-real-source-value
workflow-loop-self-remediation
issue-9-knowledge-effective
issue-7-explicit-lineage
issue-3-temporal-proof
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
bug
Something is not working

  
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement
New feature

  
help wanted
Need some help

  
invalid
Something is wrong

  
question
More information is needed

  
wontfix
This won't be fixed

No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Creatidy/model-intelligence#12
No description provided.