Align Model Intelligence with the shared evidence, snapshot and integration architecture #11
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Creatidy/model-intelligence#11
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Mandate and Source
Owner-selected documentation/planning work, explicitly authorized by Adrian on 2026-10-04, including creation of this parent and sufficiently defined gap issues. Product owner: Model Intelligence (MI). Analysis IDs: G01–G13, with MI work in G05/G06/G07/G08/G10/G12/G13 and dependencies for the rest.
Source:
Creatidy — wspólna architektura systemu, v1.0, 2026-10-04,Creatidy_architektura_systemu_2026-10-04.md, owner-supplied SHA-2564e64121599ac30896afb77574b2fd16cddfc3420afde37108611715c24b56e92. Applicable source section bundle: 1–5, 7–10, 12–18. Full file was not located under the available workspace or /tmp/kilo; use the owner's MI-specific brief, not invented section text or a claimed computed hash. Preserve Agreed / Verified / Proposed Clarification / To Prove distinctions.Current Evidence and User Problem
Canonical develop advanced during initial audit: owner merged PR #10 at 2026-10-04T22:14:43Z, merge SHA
fb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef; historical point6edd31d491a41a92e73ebfc6d9ee81c284129f8ais not today's bootstrap-only state. R2evidence.py,projection.py,deltas.py,tests/test_separated_proof.pynow exist in develop. #9 / PR #10 demonstrate a synthetic temporal proof, not licensed real-source value or a delivered Router snapshot integration. #3/PR #4 and #7/PR #8 remain unmerged STOP_REVISE experiments; their history and remediation bounds must not be reset. #1 retains the frozen real-source A/B/C and unbiased STOP/GO gate. #5/merged PR #6 cover the native bounded review workflow, not missing product functionality.README and agent guidance do not yet specify the shared target roles, knowledge publication/consumption boundary or the complete professional-operation backlog. Consumers could confuse an approved synthetic proof with live readiness, infer private entitlement from public offers or treat planned schemas as accepted contracts.
Result and Scope
One focused English documentation PR to current develop: truthful current-state index, MI architecture/decision history, integration semantics and open contracts, full requirements-to-evidence/task matrix G01–G13, prioritized coherent roadmap, and short agent pointers. Deduplicate all existing MI work and read-only cross-product counterparts before registering gaps; link actual issue URLs, do not predict numbers. Register known proof, contract, acquisition/security, calibration, operator, feedback-decision, compatibility/distribution and acceptance work without implementing it. Each new issue needs current evidence, measurable positive/negative acceptance, invariants/non-goals, producer/consumer owners, reuse proof, migration/security/diagnostic implications, dependencies and future permission requirements.
MI owns external evidence, provenance, time, conflicts and versioned knowledge publication. Router owns private accounts/telemetry, consumption, matching/calibration boundary decisions, admission and inference. Kernel owns task authority/workspace/harness lifecycle/review/outcome evidence. Console owns views and authorized command delegation, not another scheduler/ranking/state authority. Public-product dependencies are allowed; private onprem dependency is not. No repo/public-identifier renaming.
Non-Goals and Invariants
No product implementation/public schema change, product inference/live task, credentials/service/cost-policy/permissions/branch-protection change, merge/main/release/deploy, producer issue duplication in another repo, autonomous proof restart/product closure, new controller/framework/common ontology/mandatory feedback service/PKI/broker. Preserve current temporal lineage vs effective applicability and evidence vs projection delta semantics. Never convert unknown/stale/missing source to free price, false capability or entitlement. Keep issue open; PR uses Refs.
Acceptance and Failure Scenarios
make check, full-base whitespace/delta/status and documentation link/index/ADR consistency checks. Record executed commands; tests do not prove live integration.pr-reviewerreviews the whole frozen PR and registered backlog matrix; at most three remediation rounds, fresh verdict for each changed HEAD/base, final MCP currentness. Distinguish native verdict from optional formal Forgejo approval.Reuse, Priority and Permissions
Reuse existing proof/workflow and source investigations before new research. Prefer ADOPT → VENDOR/COPY → PORT → ADAPT → BUILD; candidates require exact revision/files, separate code/data/API/commercial/redistribution rights and adverse semantic tests. No material copying here.
Priority: prerequisite for honest shared integration planning; proof semantics are already delivered, real-source value and publication/calibration contracts remain higher-risk gaps. Future functional work requires separately selected issues and any necessary service/inference/effect/owner approval; this mandate supplies none of those approvals.
A documentation APPROVE means owner-merge readiness for this PR only, never READY_FOR_LIVE_TASK or product completion. Child functional tasks stay open for separate implementation/acceptance.
Documentation/backlog scope now registered: #12 licensed real-source A/B/C value (P1), #13 knowledge-publication contract (P1), #14 capability identity/calibration boundary (P1), #15 safe permitted-source producer/complete publication (P2 after #12–#14), #16 MI operator state/events (P2 after #13/#15), #17 optional evidence-sharing decision (P2 independent), #18 public install/update/migrations (P2 after source/contracts/operator), #19 installed producer–consumer acceptance (P2 after #12–#16/#18). Each is open with measurable negative/failure receipts, reuse, safety/compatibility and future permission requirements; no feature is selected for implementation by registration.
Final read-only counterpart refresh linked Router #175 requirements ↔ Kernel #49 intake; MI #13 ↔ Router #176 admitted snapshots/migration; MI #17 ↔ Router #177 local outcome analysis; MI #16 ↔ Router #182/#183 own CLI/state; MI #14 ↔ Router #179/#181 and Kernel #47; public terms ↔ Router #184. Non-MI harness/gateway #174/#178/#47 and isolation #180/#50 remain proper-product work. Kernel reference/outcome/state/concurrency broader consumers remain under Kernel #46 where dedicated children were not identified. Console consumer issue not found; MI #16 retains expected owner/contract, no fabricated number. Actual links and acceptance comparisons are in child comments and the upcoming ROADMAP.md; no other repo was modified.
Current proof limitations (not new R2 bugs) are explicitly recorded: synthetic rights/value only, in-memory artifact/no publication, no historical acquisition cutoff in knowledge(..., at), freshness not enforced by effective_at(), and no shared calibration mapping. #13/#14 research addresses the contracts, preserving #9 temporal API/semantics. The one MCP failure when posting #19's dependency comment was diagnosed by reading its empty comments and succeeded on a single sequential retry; no registration remains blocked.
One documentation PR delivered: #20 (Refs #11), targeting develop, open/unmerged. Frozen base/merge-base
fb7299810f; committed/pushed HEAD3925e59877. Six intended English documentation/rule files only, clean ordinary checkout, owner authorship and full base delta verified. Final committedUV_OFFLINE=1 make checkPASS37 with locked sync/Ruff/basedpyright/whitespace; scratch read-only link/registry checker PASS6docs/187refs/G01–G13. Product/tests/schema/lock/Makefile/native commands/reviewer implementation unchanged. Forgejo reports no workflow runs, no CI claim. Entering fresh foreground native whole-PR review of documentation and registered backlog acceptance; remediation budget 0/3 for this PR, no merge.Initial fresh native review of PR #20 at
3925e59877/ basefb7299810freturned COMMENT with one P2 incomplete Kernel counterpart discovery and a sibling-source verification limitation. No independent approval claimed.Round 1 (1/3) is committed/pushed normally as
4381d242f0on the same PR. ARCHITECTURE/ROADMAP and affected MI task comments now link actual Kernel #51–#62 with acceptance comparisons: #55 knowledge reference/evidence-cut, #58 optional-sharing origin export, #57 own state, #54 review, #56 whole-task budgets, #59/#61 concurrency/cache, #60 installed receipt and #62 compatibility/migration. #47 feasibility/#49 intake remain distinct prerequisites; #51/#52 consume requirements/routes. Router #185/#186 upgrade/public distribution counterparts also linked. This supersedes earlier parent-only/not-found comments, not historical owner decisions. No other repo mutated.Revision-pinned sibling-code assertions that the read-only reviewer could not verify were replaced by explicit contract obligations To Prove, not an invented delivered API; native permissions unchanged/no bypass. Full make check PASS37 on corrected tree, scratch link/registry check PASS218refs with explicit consumer-link regression assertions, complete corrected range whitespace/unchanged-code/status/owner identity/canonical currentness PASS. Corrected clean frozen HEAD/base prepared offline for one fresh whole-PR review; not an APPROVE yet. Source bytes/hash remain unavailable/uncomputed, Console consumer issue still not identified, product proof/integration gaps stay open.
Documentation mandate completed at READY_TO_MERGE: #20 remains open/unmerged to develop. Priority P1 for this documentation/evidence-coordination gate; registration does not select functional children for implementation. Exact base
fb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef; final and independently reviewed HEAD4381d242f072a01b7aa6fae6c1114c1a42abc8b1.Fresh native whole-PR/backlog APPROVE, empty findings; final canonical/MCP SHA/currentness and clean normal checkout checked. Review ledger initial3925e59 COMMENT → normal remediation4381d24 → fresh APPROVE; 1/3 remediation rounds, no budget reset. Formal Forgejo review list is empty; native verdict is recorded in PR comment, not a formal APPROVED publication. No protection/merge permission assumed.
Six English docs/rules delivered: README, ARCHITECTURE, ROADMAP, AGENTS, task-system and implementation-discipline. Full G01–G13 working matrix, preserved #1/#9/STOP_REVISE decisions, correct MI publication→Router #176→Kernel #55 reference chain, optional Kernel #58→Router #177 local outcomes versus MI #17 admission, own state producers, compatibility/migration and installed receipts are linked. Eight functional/research tasks #12–#19 actually created and supplemented; source rights/value, snapshot semantics, calibration, acquisition/security, operator UX/events, opt-in decision, public updates/migrations and installed acceptance remain open.
Independent final
UV_OFFLINE=1 make checkPASS37, Ruff/strict basedpyright/locked sync/whitespace; parent final checker PASS218links + G01–G13/task/consumer registry, unchanged implementation and full-range scope/whitespace verified. Forgejo no workflow runs; no CI/build/live product success claimed. Source file/hash not independently verified, and dedicated Console MI consumer task not identified; expected contract stays in #16.Highest-priority product gaps remain #12 lawful real-source value, #13 complete recognizable knowledge/evidence-cut/freshness/publication contract, #14 identity/capability/limit/calibration agreement, followed by #15–#19 professional delivery/receipt. Docs approval is not product GO or READY_FOR_LIVE_TASK. No product/schema/functional test/lock/Makefile/native implementation changed; no real task/product inference/secrets/service/permissions/merge/deploy/main/release changes. Keep this issue open for owner handoff; owner merge is the only pending documentation integration step.
Owner-selected terminology-only correction is committed and pushed on existing PR #20 as
019082e8e42ede3a9173a4622a055390c92e0fa0, based on unchanged canonical developfb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef.Removed two unnecessary active naming explanations: ARCHITECTURE.md and this issue's body. Creatidy Kernel / creatidy-kernel retains orchestration, authority, Attempt/harness/workspace/review/recovery/outcome ownership; Scarcity Router / scarcity-router retains execution resource/account/quota/economics/selection/admission/provider gateway ownership. No alias, glossary, compatibility name, renaming, new API/component or functional implementation was introduced.
Complete current tracked/hidden file inventory and exact/case/Markdown/encoded/Unicode/broad textual sweeps return zero matches. Canonical mutable-record discovery inspected all 13 open issues, three open PRs and 56 comments plus designated historical records; only this issue's active body required correction. No other existing issue/PR/comment needed terminology substitution. Closed historical records and immutable Git objects were not rewritten.
Only ARCHITECTURE.md changed in this additive correction (one insertion/two deletions); full PR still changes the original six documentation/rules files. make check PASS37, locked sync/Ruff/strict basedpyright/whitespace; links/registry PASS218; source/tests/packaging/lock/Makefile/native reviewer implementation unchanged. Prior approval of4381d24 is historical for that SHA; fresh whole-PR review of019082e and post-update canonical audit follow. Remediation used2/3 rounds, not reset. No CI workflow runs found; no merge/main/release/deploy/live task/product inference.
Package description remains explicitly dispositioned in #18 comment14425, not silently changed. Console coordination records are now available in #16 comment14308, superseding the earlier lookup's absence without proving delivery. After owner merge, next substantive MI gate remains #12 real-source A/B/C value and rights proof; #15 production acquisition is not selected before it. A full refreshed reviewer report will include current canonical receipts, the G01–G13 matrix and remaining functional limitations.
Final current documentation handoff for PR20: canonical base/merge-base
fb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef; final/reviewed HEAD019082e8e42ede3a9173a4622a055390c92e0fa0. Fresh independent native taskses_ef6ae46a0ffeoy1E4Adt14J1koreturned APPROVE with empty findings for the whole PR and backlog. Parent final Git/MCP/mirror currentness at2026-10-04T23:56:41Z matched; PR remains OPEN/UNMERGED, same clean normal checkout,3ordinary owner commits ahead/0behind.The terminology-only correction removed unnecessary active explanations from ARCHITECTURE.md and this issue body, preserving Creatidy Kernel and Scarcity Router ownership, without retaining a mistaken name as alias/glossary. Final mandatory tracked/hidden exact and normalized/broad textual sweeps are zero. Canonical post-update audit read13openissues/3openPRs/57existingcomments and verified zero remaining variants; designated historical records had no matches and were not sanitized. No existing comment required textual correction. This terminal receipt and the PR receipt do not reintroduce the invalid terminology.
Complete PR still changes only README, ARCHITECTURE, ROADMAP, AGENTS and two rules. Latest added commit changes only ARCHITECTURE (one insertion/two deletions). Full required make check PASS37 plus strict typing/Ruff/locked sync/whitespace, full-range delta unchanged-code checks; source/package/schema/runtime/native checks untouched. CI has no runs. Remediation2/3; older4381d24 approval remains historical, current019082e approval is separate native evidence, not formal Forgejo review publication.
Package summary disposition remains18comment14425. Current Console contracts are coordinated through16comment14308, not verified integration. Registered12–19 remain open with acceptance/non-goals/negatives/textual dependencies and decision gates. The next substantive MI gate is12lawful real-source A/B/C value/rights and owner STOP/GO; do not select15production work beforehand. No functional task started, product inference/live task, secrets/services/permissions/main/merge/release/deploy. Full refreshed reviewer report follows; this issue stays open for owner handoff.
Verified completion under explicit owner loop invocation
MI-loop-20261005T085020Z, not a new product GO or implementation mandate.PR #20 was already merged by Adrian on 2026-10-05T07:07:56Z as
8f503107b8800b0ff007fa81a8137f2e5834ea80. Historical accepted basefb7299810fdc4612d4e0559465faef571662c6ef, reviewed HEAD019082e8e42ede3a9173a4622a055390c92e0fa0; Git verifies exact base/head merge parents, reviewed HEAD ancestry in the merge and merge ancestry in current canonical develop013cbb43e11d7f698d359db5a456d26d8075e34e. This invocation did not merge or advance develop.Integrated acceptance checked: six-file documentation scope, G01–G13/requirements matrix, actual measurable MI #12–#19 backlog, ownership/privacy/temporal invariants, preserved #1 and STOP_REVISE history, and local documentation/reference targets. Read-only refresh of Router #175/#176/#177/#183/#185/#186, Kernel #51/#55/#57/#58/#60/#62 and Console #6 confirms the received counterpart responsibilities. Console links in #16 comment14308 and final PR receipt14551 supersede historical discovery-time absence statements; no live integration inferred. Package wording remains explicitly dispositioned under #18 comment14425, not expanded into this delivery.
Fresh
UV_OFFLINE=1 make checkPASS47 at integrated develop: locked sync, Ruff lint/format, basedpyright zero diagnostics, all offline unit tests, staged/unstaged whitespace. Clean normal checkout. Historical native final APPROVE receipt14551 is head-specific evidence; no new APPROVE or formal platform review claimed. Prior review history retained, no counter reset. No source rights/product GO/live task/inference/service/release/deployment or external mutation.Closing only this fulfilled documentation/planning mandate after verified prior merge and integrated acceptance. Functional children remain open with their existing gates.