Creatidy/scarcity-router
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 13 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

G12: Prove access-mode, quota-pool and call-cost enforcement boundaries for accepted-result budgets #184

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-04 22:25:02 +00:00 by kilo · 4 comments
kilo commented 2026-10-04 22:25:02 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Explicit Owner Decision — 2026-10-08T09:49:32Z

Owner chooses Option 1: opt-in strict verified no-PAYG and authorizes deterministic implementation within this boundary under the SAME /loop invocation 2026-10-06T16:00:17Z. This resolves the contract decision recorded in comment15630; no review/ledger/history/counter is reset. The original goal, acceptance and constraints are preserved below.

  1. Strict guarantee is explicitly enabled only. Never silently enable it for existing clients, change grants or weaken stronger restrictions including D-039.
  2. Strict execution is admitted only when sufficiently current, source-specific evidence establishes that the complete authorized execution path cannot enter PAYG, purchased-credit, paid-overflow or unaccounted paid-helper execution.
  3. Unknown, mixed, opaque or insufficiently evidenced paths refuse before execution with actionable typed reasons; no fallback or downgrade.
  4. Verified Router admission enforcement is distinct from observed provider billing. No claim of zero actual charges, zero total task cost or verified provider settlement without corresponding independent evidence. No billing attestation is invented.
  5. Configuration-declared entitlement, token rates, local reservations and subscription quota observations do not prove actual billing outcomes. They cannot satisfy the strict evidence gate alone.
  6. Router owns source/call enforcement and facts; Kernel retains whole-task budget responsibility. Do not invent numerical task budgets or guarantees an execution source cannot enforce. Any remaining separately authorized live-evidence acceptance gate remains explicit, not manufactured.
  7. Existing entitlement/authorization precedence and confirmed quota-pool semantics are preserved. Unknown usage is never zero.

This selection approves unsupported strict-path refusal without withdrawing ordinary legacy/default access. D-063 stays supported under its existing constraints; #199 replacement/retirement gate is not waived. Public/machine/worker/config compatibility must be explicit, not silently changed. Source/evidence/control truth is distinct from billing/settlement, availability, intrinsic model capability or total financial promise.

Implementation is security_critical: normal required validation and fresh complete ordinary technical/UX review, then independent gpt-daybreak-blue-latest security review through direct official Codex at stable exact base/HEAD before completion/merge. No Kilo discovery availability gate, substitute, live financial/model probe, deployment, release, main promotion or cross-repository mutation is authorized. No additional owner continuation is needed merely for this approved deterministic work; genuinely new unresolved authority/acceptance decisions remain owner-controlled.

Goal

Product owner: Scarcity Router for source/call facts and supported enforcement; Kernel aggregates task path. G12/G07/G10/G05. Source: Creatidy architecture v1.0 (2026-10-04), sections 1-5, 7-13, 14-18 via #173. Establish truthful economics/access constraints and implement evidenced missing per-call/source enforcement without pretending to guarantee end-to-end task cost.

Why and Evidence

At develop 8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b, routing_core.SpendingLimit is a micro-USD/Mtoken rate ceiling; _spend_limit_codes gates configured metered prices, not request total. AdministratorConstraints/ClientAuthorization.allowed_entitlements can hard-exclude PAYG; zero price cap is not a no-PAYG rule. Confirmed quota pools and resource freshness exist. Recommendation capacity is one snapshot per provider, not proof of complete independently attributed multi-account state. SourceConfig pins subscription entitlement; native Codex verifies ChatGPT auth, ZCode does not prove physical model/billing, and native helper/retry calls may be opaque. D-058 refuses binding output caps unsupported by channels. Fact: rate/request/accepted-result budgets differ; no numeric new budgets supplied by owner.

Scope

Evidence inventory for accounts/sources/shared pools/reset windows/public offers vs private capacity/access modes, provider overflow behavior, hidden retry/helper/subagent calls, per-request/token/output/wall limits and local reservations. Determine guaranteed vs configured/reported/estimated/unknown for each actual source and implement only supported missing restrictions/facts after contract decision. Kernel owns solver/review/remediation/owner-attention totals, not Router task scheduling. No quota-to-token conversion, provider reservation or overflow/reset redemption invented.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. no PAYG is a hard authorized access-mode rule, tested against known PAYG/prepaid/unknown/mixed/automatic-overflow and channels configured as subscription without sufficient evidence. Ranking/zero price never bypasses it; where billing mode cannot be controlled/confirmed, the guarantee is bounded or source rejected.
  2. Distinct sources/accounts sharing a confirmed pool are one capacity budget; independently confirmed accounts remain distinct. Unknown sharing/applicability and stale/reset-expired observations remain unknown, with safe opaque association not public account IDs. Negative tests cover cross-source telemetry and other clients' use.
  3. Public facts/promotions apply only when plan/model/channel/harness/version/time prerequisites are proved, expire without refresh and never fabricate free quota. Subscription-first remains the product; PAYG/local classes remain supported, GPU/API-key affordability is not assumed.
  4. Report price rate, supported request ceiling, measured/estimated/unknown usage, helper/retry multiplicity and local reservation explicitly. No output-cap control means no hard spend guarantee; token counts cannot deduct quota; balance deltas cannot attribute one task amid other clients. Local reservation is not provider reservation.
  5. Revoked authority, concurrent exhaustion, provider ambiguity, cap-not-enforceable, unknown usage and expired promotions fail/explain correctly. Additional credits/reset/paid overflow require separate authority; never automatically consumed.
  6. Producer-consumer call-fact fixtures allow Kernel's full path accounting without false totals; preserve existing configs/entitlement enums/public contracts through explicit migration, docs and negative tests. Full gates plus bounded actual-source evidence; unknown cases remain honest.

Dependencies, Reuse, Priority and Authority

First-priority guarantee clarification/contract prerequisite; detailed enforcement follows #179 identity/access proof and #175 requirements; Kernel aggregation feeds #177 local outcome analysis. No-PAYG cannot wait for a later ranking optimization. Reuse allowed_entitlements, ResourceCost/QuotaPool, current eligibility, UsageAccounting, effective limits and coordinator reservations; do not add a second economics/scoring engine. External reuse needs exact revision/files/license/attribution, semantic/security/negative tests, dependencies/maintenance and separate service terms before adoption.
Refs #173, #86/#87, #136/D-058, D-042. Future provider/inference/billing/overflow tests require separate tightly scoped authority; registration permits none. Owner must approve unsupported-guarantee handling/real spending constraints, not agent-invented money/quota/time limits. The explicit decision above supplies the approved deterministic handling, not new live or numerical authority.

## Explicit Owner Decision — 2026-10-08T09:49:32Z Owner chooses **Option 1: opt-in strict verified no-PAYG** and authorizes deterministic implementation within this boundary under the SAME `/loop` invocation `2026-10-06T16:00:17Z`. This resolves the contract decision recorded in comment15630; no review/ledger/history/counter is reset. The original goal, acceptance and constraints are preserved below. 1. Strict guarantee is explicitly enabled only. Never silently enable it for existing clients, change grants or weaken stronger restrictions including D-039. 2. Strict execution is admitted only when sufficiently current, source-specific evidence establishes that the complete authorized execution path cannot enter PAYG, purchased-credit, paid-overflow or unaccounted paid-helper execution. 3. Unknown, mixed, opaque or insufficiently evidenced paths refuse before execution with actionable typed reasons; no fallback or downgrade. 4. **Verified Router admission enforcement is distinct from observed provider billing.** No claim of zero actual charges, zero total task cost or verified provider settlement without corresponding independent evidence. No billing attestation is invented. 5. Configuration-declared entitlement, token rates, local reservations and subscription quota observations do not prove actual billing outcomes. They cannot satisfy the strict evidence gate alone. 6. Router owns source/call enforcement and facts; Kernel retains whole-task budget responsibility. Do not invent numerical task budgets or guarantees an execution source cannot enforce. Any remaining separately authorized live-evidence acceptance gate remains explicit, not manufactured. 7. Existing entitlement/authorization precedence and confirmed quota-pool semantics are preserved. Unknown usage is never zero. This selection approves unsupported strict-path refusal without withdrawing ordinary legacy/default access. D-063 stays supported under its existing constraints; #199 replacement/retirement gate is not waived. Public/machine/worker/config compatibility must be explicit, not silently changed. Source/evidence/control truth is distinct from billing/settlement, availability, intrinsic model capability or total financial promise. Implementation is **security_critical**: normal required validation and fresh complete ordinary technical/UX review, then independent `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` security review through direct official Codex at stable exact base/HEAD before completion/merge. No Kilo discovery availability gate, substitute, live financial/model probe, deployment, release, main promotion or cross-repository mutation is authorized. No additional owner continuation is needed merely for this approved deterministic work; genuinely new unresolved authority/acceptance decisions remain owner-controlled. --- ## Goal **Product owner: Scarcity Router** for source/call facts and supported enforcement; Kernel aggregates task path. G12/G07/G10/G05. Source: Creatidy architecture v1.0 (2026-10-04), sections 1-5, 7-13, 14-18 via #173. Establish truthful economics/access constraints and implement evidenced missing per-call/source enforcement without pretending to guarantee end-to-end task cost. ## Why and Evidence At develop `8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b`, `routing_core.SpendingLimit` is a micro-USD/Mtoken rate ceiling; `_spend_limit_codes` gates configured metered prices, not request total. `AdministratorConstraints`/`ClientAuthorization.allowed_entitlements` can hard-exclude PAYG; zero price cap is not a no-PAYG rule. Confirmed quota pools and resource freshness exist. Recommendation capacity is one snapshot per provider, not proof of complete independently attributed multi-account state. SourceConfig pins subscription entitlement; native Codex verifies ChatGPT auth, ZCode does not prove physical model/billing, and native helper/retry calls may be opaque. D-058 refuses binding output caps unsupported by channels. Fact: rate/request/accepted-result budgets differ; no numeric new budgets supplied by owner. ## Scope Evidence inventory for accounts/sources/shared pools/reset windows/public offers vs private capacity/access modes, provider overflow behavior, hidden retry/helper/subagent calls, per-request/token/output/wall limits and local reservations. Determine guaranteed vs configured/reported/estimated/unknown for each actual source and implement only supported missing restrictions/facts after contract decision. Kernel owns solver/review/remediation/owner-attention totals, not Router task scheduling. No quota-to-token conversion, provider reservation or overflow/reset redemption invented. ## Acceptance Criteria 1. no PAYG is a hard authorized access-mode rule, tested against known PAYG/prepaid/unknown/mixed/automatic-overflow and channels configured as subscription without sufficient evidence. Ranking/zero price never bypasses it; where billing mode cannot be controlled/confirmed, the guarantee is bounded or source rejected. 2. Distinct sources/accounts sharing a confirmed pool are one capacity budget; independently confirmed accounts remain distinct. Unknown sharing/applicability and stale/reset-expired observations remain unknown, with safe opaque association not public account IDs. Negative tests cover cross-source telemetry and other clients' use. 3. Public facts/promotions apply only when plan/model/channel/harness/version/time prerequisites are proved, expire without refresh and never fabricate free quota. Subscription-first remains the product; PAYG/local classes remain supported, GPU/API-key affordability is not assumed. 4. Report price rate, supported request ceiling, measured/estimated/unknown usage, helper/retry multiplicity and local reservation explicitly. No output-cap control means no hard spend guarantee; token counts cannot deduct quota; balance deltas cannot attribute one task amid other clients. Local reservation is not provider reservation. 5. Revoked authority, concurrent exhaustion, provider ambiguity, cap-not-enforceable, unknown usage and expired promotions fail/explain correctly. Additional credits/reset/paid overflow require separate authority; never automatically consumed. 6. Producer-consumer call-fact fixtures allow Kernel's full path accounting without false totals; preserve existing configs/entitlement enums/public contracts through explicit migration, docs and negative tests. Full gates plus bounded actual-source evidence; unknown cases remain honest. ## Dependencies, Reuse, Priority and Authority First-priority guarantee clarification/contract prerequisite; detailed enforcement follows #179 identity/access proof and #175 requirements; Kernel aggregation feeds #177 local outcome analysis. No-PAYG cannot wait for a later ranking optimization. Reuse allowed_entitlements, ResourceCost/QuotaPool, current eligibility, UsageAccounting, effective limits and coordinator reservations; do not add a second economics/scoring engine. External reuse needs exact revision/files/license/attribution, semantic/security/negative tests, dependencies/maintenance and separate service terms before adoption. Refs #173, #86/#87, #136/D-058, D-042. Future provider/inference/billing/overflow tests require separate tightly scoped authority; registration permits none. Owner must approve unsupported-guarantee handling/real spending constraints, not agent-invented money/quota/time limits. The explicit decision above supplies the approved deterministic handling, not new live or numerical authority.
kilo commented 2026-10-04 23:06:44 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Full-task budget consumer is now Kernel #56, covering money/quota/token/time/attention across failures/helpers/review, not Kernel #48's lifetime-only result. Kernel #58 supplies explicit local exports for Router #177. MI #12 and MI #15 supply public offer units/conditions only; they cannot prove private entitlement/balance or billing mode. Router produces supported call/access/pool/hidden-retry facts here; Kernel aggregates/enforces the authorized task envelope. Producer guarantees -> whole-path consumer -> local evidence. All counterparts OPEN; no numeric spending or inference authority added.

Full-task budget consumer is now [Kernel #56](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/56), covering money/quota/token/time/attention across failures/helpers/review, not [Kernel #48](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/48)'s lifetime-only result. [Kernel #58](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/58) supplies explicit local exports for Router #177. [MI #12](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/model-intelligence/issues/12) and [MI #15](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/model-intelligence/issues/15) supply public offer units/conditions only; they cannot prove private entitlement/balance or billing mode. Router produces supported call/access/pool/hidden-retry facts here; Kernel aggregates/enforces the authorized task envelope. Producer guarantees -> whole-path consumer -> local evidence. All counterparts OPEN; no numeric spending or inference authority added.
kilo commented 2026-10-08 01:17:25 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

STOP_AND_ASK — Unsupported Financial Guarantee Boundary

Selected under SAME invocation 2026-10-06T16:00:17Z after #175/PR200 verified integration/closure and a fresh complete 15-issue queue. Exact exclusions applied first; #179/#175 are delivered, #174 retains its explicit OPEN real-harness gate. #184's own source/call contract research has no invented Kernel56-before-producer prerequisite. No #184 branch, PR, implementation or review has been created (count0).

Read-only actual source confirms routing_core.py:1370–1401 gates configured metered prices as rates and exempts configured nonmetered entitlements; 1404–1428 filters authorized configured classes. capacity-model.md:24–36, architecture/security and this issue distinguish these facts from observed billing, hidden/helper multiplicity, overflow and total spend. Kernel56 requires honest supported Root facts and explicit owner policy for unsupported whole-path enforcement. No live/billing probe or numerical budget is authorized.

Exact owner decision: Is a mandatory no-PAYG promise a positively evidenced zero-paid/overflow/helper guarantee for the admitted call, or an explicitly narrower configured-source/access-class restriction with actual billing/multiplicity remaining UNKNOWN? AC1 allows bounded guarantee OR source rejection; this issue's final permission and roadmap require owner approval of unsupported hard-cost handling before implementation. The existing no-PAYG authorization direction does not settle this promise/evidence threshold or resulting compatibility behavior.

Recommended: an opt-in strict verified hard-guarantee mode rejects unknown/mixed/automatic-overflow/opaque-helper sources for that guarantee, while ordinary legacy/default configured-class grants remain unchanged and accurately labeled; no hard financial promise is attached to them.

Alternative: explicitly accept the bounded authorized-source/class exclusion, with unverified actual billing/helper costs reported UNKNOWN and total-spend guarantees refused. This accepts a narrower promise, not zero financial risk.

Existing class filters, zero rate caps, source/auth/usage facts, and fail-closed/bounded-fact designs were considered. They cannot independently prove provider behavior or choose financial acceptance. Applying an attestation rule to existing grants could withdraw proven native functionality without an approved migration; advertising class-only control as absolute zero-paid would weaken the claim. Unauthorized live/spending/access work is not a recovery path. No numeric limits, benefits/reset/overflow authority or new scope is invented.

This is the issue's material financial/public-contract decision, not an unavailable tool, test-running question, new ranking preference or failed security-review path. Entire invocation stops; do not skip #184 or reset counters. Historical #180/#175 five-review receipts remain intact; #199 stays gated and D-063 is preserved. No other repository was modified. Explicit owner continuation can resolve the contract boundary and resume the same ledger.

## STOP_AND_ASK — Unsupported Financial Guarantee Boundary Selected under SAME invocation `2026-10-06T16:00:17Z` after #175/PR200 verified integration/closure and a fresh complete 15-issue queue. Exact exclusions applied first; #179/#175 are delivered, #174 retains its explicit OPEN real-harness gate. #184's own source/call contract research has no invented Kernel56-before-producer prerequisite. No #184 branch, PR, implementation or review has been created (count0). Read-only actual source confirms `routing_core.py:1370–1401` gates configured metered prices as rates and exempts configured nonmetered entitlements; `1404–1428` filters authorized configured classes. `capacity-model.md:24–36`, architecture/security and this issue distinguish these facts from observed billing, hidden/helper multiplicity, overflow and total spend. Kernel56 requires honest supported Root facts and explicit owner policy for unsupported whole-path enforcement. No live/billing probe or numerical budget is authorized. **Exact owner decision:** Is a mandatory no-PAYG promise a positively evidenced zero-paid/overflow/helper guarantee for the admitted call, or an explicitly narrower configured-source/access-class restriction with actual billing/multiplicity remaining UNKNOWN? AC1 allows bounded guarantee OR source rejection; this issue's final permission and roadmap require owner approval of unsupported hard-cost handling before implementation. The existing no-PAYG authorization direction does not settle this promise/evidence threshold or resulting compatibility behavior. **Recommended:** an opt-in strict verified hard-guarantee mode rejects unknown/mixed/automatic-overflow/opaque-helper sources for that guarantee, while ordinary legacy/default configured-class grants remain unchanged and accurately labeled; no hard financial promise is attached to them. **Alternative:** explicitly accept the bounded authorized-source/class exclusion, with unverified actual billing/helper costs reported UNKNOWN and total-spend guarantees refused. This accepts a narrower promise, not zero financial risk. Existing class filters, zero rate caps, source/auth/usage facts, and fail-closed/bounded-fact designs were considered. They cannot independently prove provider behavior or choose financial acceptance. Applying an attestation rule to existing grants could withdraw proven native functionality without an approved migration; advertising class-only control as absolute zero-paid would weaken the claim. Unauthorized live/spending/access work is not a recovery path. No numeric limits, benefits/reset/overflow authority or new scope is invented. This is the issue's material financial/public-contract decision, not an unavailable tool, test-running question, new ranking preference or failed security-review path. Entire invocation stops; do not skip #184 or reset counters. Historical #180/#175 five-review receipts remain intact; #199 stays gated and D-063 is preserved. No other repository was modified. Explicit owner continuation can resolve the contract boundary and resume the same ledger.
kilo commented 2026-10-08 16:22:18 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Deterministic Option1 implementation is committed as a76c1c6f40488044e4cc3f2f5a13d6aab732a5ab on base 5c48d51f1eb1f11424a5100eb2ccf20a6cba4581; PR #201 targets develop. Sanitized full gate PASS (2767 tests, 17 skips, both type checks zero diagnostics, full/staged whitespace PASS). Opt-in strict admission/dispatch/continuation and honest local call-fact reception preserve default grants and stronger restrictions. Positive evidence is fixed synthetic real-HTTP reception only; current production adapters remain strict-ineligible, billing/settlement/task totals unknown and separate live/Kernel gates unchanged. Fresh complete ordinary technical/UX review and direct official Codex Daybreak security review remain pending. No merge or closure yet.

Deterministic Option1 implementation is committed as `a76c1c6f40488044e4cc3f2f5a13d6aab732a5ab` on base `5c48d51f1eb1f11424a5100eb2ccf20a6cba4581`; PR #201 targets develop. Sanitized full gate PASS (2767 tests, 17 skips, both type checks zero diagnostics, full/staged whitespace PASS). Opt-in strict admission/dispatch/continuation and honest local call-fact reception preserve default grants and stronger restrictions. Positive evidence is fixed synthetic real-HTTP reception only; current production adapters remain strict-ineligible, billing/settlement/task totals unknown and separate live/Kernel gates unchanged. Fresh complete ordinary technical/UX review and direct official Codex Daybreak security review remain pending. No merge or closure yet.
kilo commented 2026-10-08 17:25:45 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Integrated the owner-approved deterministic Option1 scope through PR #201.

Base: 5c48d51f1eb1f11424a5100eb2ccf20a6cba4581; approved HEAD: 51782a8d61017763d45749de5abf6ff5db7b3547; canonical merge: 3834b52f93522fa81af6bd92d5073e04b5d0e050. Both approved parents are verified ancestors; integrated tree exactly equals the approved tree (559fe1be279459f529d4dc83789c7631382fbe7f). Designated checkout is clean canonical develop.

Acceptance evidence:

  1. Opt-in hard no-PAYG gate covers known paid/prepaid/unknown/configured-only/mixed/partial paths, before ranking/exact dispatch. Current grant relaxation cannot downgrade an admitted strict request; original control scope persists across continuation rounds. Removed/stale/expired/cross-source/control-drift proof refuses before execution, without fallback.
  2. Confirmed pool and freshness/association semantics are unchanged and covered by existing deterministic resource/routing tests. Source/pool IDs do not establish independently verified accounts; no quota-to-token or balance-to-task deduction is introduced.
  3. Promotions remain conditional/unverified, expire without free quota; all existing subscription/PAYG/local classes and default grants remain supported. Strict mode does not invent affordability or paid-overflow authority.
  4. Local versioned facts distinguish configured rate/allowance/control, reported/estimated/missing visible usage, unknown helper multiplicity and actual local reservation versus provider reservation. Resumed turns never claim an unacquired slot; billing/settlement/task totals remain unknown.
  5. Existing stronger authority, D-039, concurrency, output-cap and ambiguity restrictions remain; strict proof cannot override them. Credit/reset/paid overflow are never automatically authorized.
  6. Actual fixed synthetic HTTP producer/parser reception and trusted local call receipts pass deterministic conformance. Explicit additive administrator grant migration preserves frozen public/worker/audit/usage contracts. Actual inspected production source paths lack full closure and are correctly strict-ineligible; this is not live billing or Kernel whole-task receipt acceptance.

Required sanitized full gate:2774 tests PASS/17 skips, both type checks zero diagnostics, sync and full/staged whitespace PASS. Integrated acceptance on canonical merge:319 PASS. Reviews retained:ordinal1 REQUEST_CHANGES,2 REQUEST_CHANGES,3 fresh whole-PR technical/UX APPROVE (empty findings),4 independent direct official Codex gpt-daybreak-blue-latest security APPROVE (empty findings), both at exact approved base/HEAD. CLI0.159.3 dispatch verified; physical runtime identity not independently observable. Normal implementation/remediation commits a76c1c6, a136cd0, 51782a8 retained.

Closing only the owner-approved deterministic source/call enforcement delivery. Production full-path control/live/provider-billing evidence, actual financial settlement, Kernel whole-task aggregation and #199/D-063 replacement/retirement remain separately gated. No live model/financial probe, deployment, release/main or cross-repository mutation occurred.

Integrated the owner-approved deterministic Option1 scope through PR #201. Base: `5c48d51f1eb1f11424a5100eb2ccf20a6cba4581`; approved HEAD: `51782a8d61017763d45749de5abf6ff5db7b3547`; canonical merge: `3834b52f93522fa81af6bd92d5073e04b5d0e050`. Both approved parents are verified ancestors; integrated tree exactly equals the approved tree (`559fe1be279459f529d4dc83789c7631382fbe7f`). Designated checkout is clean canonical develop. Acceptance evidence: 1. Opt-in hard no-PAYG gate covers known paid/prepaid/unknown/configured-only/mixed/partial paths, before ranking/exact dispatch. Current grant relaxation cannot downgrade an admitted strict request; original control scope persists across continuation rounds. Removed/stale/expired/cross-source/control-drift proof refuses before execution, without fallback. 2. Confirmed pool and freshness/association semantics are unchanged and covered by existing deterministic resource/routing tests. Source/pool IDs do not establish independently verified accounts; no quota-to-token or balance-to-task deduction is introduced. 3. Promotions remain conditional/unverified, expire without free quota; all existing subscription/PAYG/local classes and default grants remain supported. Strict mode does not invent affordability or paid-overflow authority. 4. Local versioned facts distinguish configured rate/allowance/control, reported/estimated/missing visible usage, unknown helper multiplicity and actual local reservation versus provider reservation. Resumed turns never claim an unacquired slot; billing/settlement/task totals remain unknown. 5. Existing stronger authority, D-039, concurrency, output-cap and ambiguity restrictions remain; strict proof cannot override them. Credit/reset/paid overflow are never automatically authorized. 6. Actual fixed synthetic HTTP producer/parser reception and trusted local call receipts pass deterministic conformance. Explicit additive administrator grant migration preserves frozen public/worker/audit/usage contracts. Actual inspected production source paths lack full closure and are correctly strict-ineligible; this is not live billing or Kernel whole-task receipt acceptance. Required sanitized full gate:2774 tests PASS/17 skips, both type checks zero diagnostics, sync and full/staged whitespace PASS. Integrated acceptance on canonical merge:319 PASS. Reviews retained:ordinal1 REQUEST_CHANGES,2 REQUEST_CHANGES,3 fresh whole-PR technical/UX APPROVE (empty findings),4 independent direct official Codex `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` security APPROVE (empty findings), both at exact approved base/HEAD. CLI0.159.3 dispatch verified; physical runtime identity not independently observable. Normal implementation/remediation commits `a76c1c6`, `a136cd0`, `51782a8` retained. Closing only the owner-approved deterministic source/call enforcement delivery. Production full-path control/live/provider-billing evidence, actual financial settlement, Kernel whole-task aggregation and #199/D-063 replacement/retirement remain separately gated. No live model/financial probe, deployment, release/main or cross-repository mutation occurred.
kilo closed this issue 2026-10-08 17:25:50 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
develop
issue-246-authorized-receipt
issue-245-mi-startup
issue-226-administrator-ux
issue-183-observer-access
issue-183-event-acceptance
issue-183-internal-events
issue-183-resource-state
issue-242-secure-bootstrap
issue-238-mi-server
issue-239-architecture-reconciliation
issue-224-certificate-lifecycle
issue-224-origin-bound-worker
issue-224-worker-ca-trust
issue-234-evidenced-resources
issue-186-installed-lifecycle
issue-186-ghcr-distribution
issue-225-cancel-paths
issue-228-backlog-disposition
issue-222-active-mi
issue-176-mi-consumer
issue-185-contract-conformance
issue-219-project-security-audit
issue-181-responses-subset
issue-214-claude-subscription
issue-205-review-result-recovery
issue-174-executable-contract
issue-215-conversational-review
issue-210-d069-review-governance
issue-212-d069a-bootstrap
issue-202-dependency-eligibility
issue-184-strict-no-payg
issue-175-kernel-requirements
issue-180-native-authority-boundary
issue-182-readable-status
issue-195-post-selection-gates
issue-179-catalog-effort
issue-178-exact-target-pin
issue-190-workflow-self-remediation
task/168-capacity-controlled-home
fix/143-scenario11-cancel-race
policy/zai-model-governance-campaign
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
accessibility
Barrier affecting people with disabilities

  
bug
Something isn't working

  
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement
New feature or request

  
good first issue
Good for newcomers

  
help wanted
Extra attention is needed

  
invalid
This doesn't seem right

  
P1
Owner-declared highest explicit implementation priority (loop ordering rank)

  
P2
Required product and integration work

  
P3
Deferred or producer-dependent work

  
question
Further information is requested

  
wontfix
This will not be worked on

No labels
accessibility
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
P1
P2
P3
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Blocks
#177 G07: Define explicit local outcome export consumption and cautious task-level cost calibration
Creatidy/scarcity-router
Reference
Creatidy/scarcity-router#184
No description provided.