Creatidy/scarcity-router

Fork 0

Align Scarcity Router with Creatidy architecture and register actionable gaps (#173) #187

Merged

adrian.tkacz merged 2 commits from docs/173-creatidy-system-alignment into develop

2026-10-05 08:26:18 +00:00

kilo commented

2026-10-04 23:43:29 +00:00

Member

Closes #173 only after human integration. Documentation/planning only; OPEN and unmerged. No product-complete/READY_FOR_LIVE_TASK claim or functional-gap closure.

Final Revision

Canonical base: 8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b.
Final HEAD: 9d592ef3130fc5cd78917973a17675c7c5b1d396.
Initial reviewed HEAD: a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a.
Two issue-scoped documentation commits, no merge/history rewrite; 21 existing English files, product implementation/public schemas/ratings unchanged.

Architecture and Coverage

D-068 records owner-agreed Kernel task/authority/workspace/harness/outcome ownership; Router sources/accounts/pools/private telemetry/selection/admission/provider calls; MI public versioned evidence; Console authorized views/commands. Public-module dependencies are allowed without private-onprem/four-service/commonDB mandates. Source v1.0 filename/supplied hash retained; full source bytes unavailable locally, owner brief used, no independent hash-verification claim.

U-014/#180 preserves integrated D-063 workspace editing as an ownership/migration conflict, not conformance. D-047 cancellation is superseded; D-056's Router-owned orchestration suggestion is replaced by Kernel ownership. Exact gateway admission is distinguished from the reproduced pure-core pin defect. Existing generic clients retain semantics.

Current catalog v5/policy v9 and worker v4 are correctly described; older catalog/policy statements are historical. Recommendation REST is not inference; unpublished index/image upgrades are conditional. Historical/synthetic/live evidence stays distinct. Latest owner naming clarification removes the unnecessary explanation from architecture/#173, uses real canonical products directly and introduces no alias/rename/new component. Committed exact/case/formatting sweeps are zero;21open issue bodies/19current comments audited, #173 corrected/reread; no history sanitization.

Full G01-G13 evidence/ownership/document/task matrix: docs/roadmap.md. Actual registered work:

#174 executable recommendation/admission/pin; #175 rich monotone requirements.
#178 exact-core-pin narrowing; #179 effort/variant and honest identity.
#180 native-agent authority/migration; #184 access-mode/pool/source-call economics.
#176 admitted MI snapshots/bootstrap transition; #185 artifact/contract migrations.
#177 explicit local outcomes/cautious calibration; #182 CLI UX; #183 authorized reconnectable state/events.
#181 actual compatibility/evidenced Responses subset; #186 uncovered public artifact/platform gates.

Reused #139 TLS/#140 adminUI/#141 composed acceptance/#165 cancellation; G01/G02/G03/G11 implementations remain Kernel-owned. Actual OPEN Kernel46/MI11 children supply requirement, route, provenance, budget, export, migration and installed receipts. Actual Console #2 read/auth, #3 snapshot/reconnect/gaps and #12 installed/browser acceptance consume Router #183/#140/#186. Only Router repo/issues/PR mutated; registered counterparts do not prove integration.

One Review and One Remediation

Independent review694: substantive CHANGES_REQUESTED at initial a57ed0c, formal COMMENT. Exactly two documentation blockers: stale current catalog/Astra/policy statements and missed Console-consumer coverage already linked by comment14299. The sole remediation commit reconciles both files, #183 body, corrected comment14358 and checkpoint14389, plus this PR description. No duplicate task, new owner decision or product implementation. Narrow final verification is limited to those blockers/obvious remediation regressions at new exact HEAD; its actual verdict is recorded separately in reviews/final report. No pushes during review.

Actual Validation

uv sync --only-dev PASS.
Full make check after the sole remediation: 2674 tests OK,15runtime probes skipped,588.605s, built-in basedpyright0errors/0warnings/0notes.
Separate remediation basedpyright0/0/0; whitespaceclean; no checks weakened.
Earlier fullpasses619.426s/604.036s/597.455s with identical counts; guardrails42OK; package-check allwheel/sdist/isolatedCLI/MCP/REST/defaultsPASS.
Initial-head Forgejo CI run2202 SUCCESS,9m38s, a57ed0c only. New-head CI is reported separately; no green CI for9d592ef is claimed here.
Branch-protection read denied by admin permission; requirements neither guessed nor changed. Distinct reviewer dispatch observable; resolved model/effort RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE, not inferred from labels/self-report.

Original120minbudget from22:11Z, no reset: one initial review, one remediation, one narrow final verification. Implementation gaps #174-#186 remain OPEN, with exact closure/negative-test/reuse/migration/authority requirements in actual issues. First priorities remain exact pin/effort, rich quality/executable-consumer contract, native authority and honest economics; documentation review does not hide them.

No product inference/real task, secrets/services/permissions/branch-protection/main changes, approval/merge/release/deploy. Synthetic localhost/isolated package checks only. Full final reviewer report records every changed file/write and exact final review/CI state.

Closes #173 only after human integration. **Documentation/planning only; OPEN and unmerged.** No product-complete/READY_FOR_LIVE_TASK claim or functional-gap closure. ## Final Revision - Canonical base: `8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b`. - Final HEAD: `9d592ef3130fc5cd78917973a17675c7c5b1d396`. - Initial reviewed HEAD: `a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a`. - Two issue-scoped documentation commits, no merge/history rewrite; 21 existing English files, product implementation/public schemas/ratings unchanged. ## Architecture and Coverage D-068 records owner-agreed Kernel task/authority/workspace/harness/outcome ownership; Router sources/accounts/pools/private telemetry/selection/admission/provider calls; MI public versioned evidence; Console authorized views/commands. Public-module dependencies are allowed without private-onprem/four-service/commonDB mandates. Source v1.0 filename/supplied hash retained; full source bytes unavailable locally, owner brief used, no independent hash-verification claim. U-014/#180 preserves integrated D-063 workspace editing as an ownership/migration conflict, not conformance. D-047 cancellation is superseded; D-056's Router-owned orchestration suggestion is replaced by Kernel ownership. Exact gateway admission is distinguished from the reproduced pure-core pin defect. Existing generic clients retain semantics. Current catalog v5/policy v9 and worker v4 are correctly described; older catalog/policy statements are historical. Recommendation REST is not inference; unpublished index/image upgrades are conditional. Historical/synthetic/live evidence stays distinct. Latest owner naming clarification removes the unnecessary explanation from architecture/#173, uses real canonical products directly and introduces no alias/rename/new component. Committed exact/case/formatting sweeps are zero;21open issue bodies/19current comments audited, #173 corrected/reread; no history sanitization. Full G01-G13 evidence/ownership/document/task matrix: docs/roadmap.md. Actual registered work: - #174 executable recommendation/admission/pin; #175 rich monotone requirements. - #178 exact-core-pin narrowing; #179 effort/variant and honest identity. - #180 native-agent authority/migration; #184 access-mode/pool/source-call economics. - #176 admitted MI snapshots/bootstrap transition; #185 artifact/contract migrations. - #177 explicit local outcomes/cautious calibration; #182 CLI UX; #183 authorized reconnectable state/events. - #181 actual compatibility/evidenced Responses subset; #186 uncovered public artifact/platform gates. Reused #139 TLS/#140 adminUI/#141 composed acceptance/#165 cancellation; G01/G02/G03/G11 implementations remain Kernel-owned. Actual OPEN Kernel46/MI11 children supply requirement, route, provenance, budget, export, migration and installed receipts. Actual [Console #2](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-console/issues/2) read/auth, [#3](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-console/issues/3) snapshot/reconnect/gaps and [#12](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-console/issues/12) installed/browser acceptance consume Router #183/#140/#186. Only Router repo/issues/PR mutated; registered counterparts do not prove integration. ## One Review and One Remediation Independent review694: substantive CHANGES_REQUESTED at initial a57ed0c, formal COMMENT. Exactly two documentation blockers: stale current catalog/Astra/policy statements and missed Console-consumer coverage already linked by comment14299. The sole remediation commit reconciles both files, #183 body, corrected comment14358 and checkpoint14389, plus this PR description. No duplicate task, new owner decision or product implementation. Narrow final verification is limited to those blockers/obvious remediation regressions at new exact HEAD; its actual verdict is recorded separately in reviews/final report. No pushes during review. ## Actual Validation - uv sync --only-dev PASS. - Full make check after the sole remediation: **2674 tests OK,15runtime probes skipped,588.605s**, built-in basedpyright0errors/0warnings/0notes. - Separate remediation basedpyright0/0/0; whitespaceclean; no checks weakened. - Earlier fullpasses619.426s/604.036s/597.455s with identical counts; guardrails42OK; package-check allwheel/sdist/isolatedCLI/MCP/REST/defaultsPASS. - Initial-head Forgejo CI [run2202](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/actions/runs/136) SUCCESS,9m38s, **a57ed0c only**. New-head CI is reported separately; no green CI for9d592ef is claimed here. - Branch-protection read denied by admin permission; requirements neither guessed nor changed. Distinct reviewer dispatch observable; resolved model/effort RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE, not inferred from labels/self-report. Original120minbudget from22:11Z, no reset: one initial review, one remediation, one narrow final verification. Implementation gaps #174-#186 remain OPEN, with exact closure/negative-test/reuse/migration/authority requirements in actual issues. First priorities remain exact pin/effort, rich quality/executable-consumer contract, native authority and honest economics; documentation review does not hide them. No product inference/real task, secrets/services/permissions/branch-protection/main changes, approval/merge/release/deploy. Synthetic localhost/isolated package checks only. Full final reviewer report records every changed file/write and exact final review/CI state.

kilo added 1 commit

2026-10-04 23:43:29 +00:00

Align Creatidy architecture and register actionable gaps (#173 )

ci / check (pull_request) Successful in 9m38s

Details

a57ed0c4e6

kilo referenced this pull request

2026-10-04 23:45:39 +00:00

Align Scarcity Router with the Creatidy system architecture and register actionable gaps #173

kilo reviewed

2026-10-04 23:50:07 +00:00

kilo left a comment

Substantive Verdict

CHANGES_REQUESTED for documentation scope. Formal Forgejo state: COMMENT, not approval. Parent task: #173.

reviewed_base: 8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b
reviewed_head: a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a

Git HEAD, branch and canonical PR metadata agree. Worktree clean before and after review; one commit, no merges, exactly 21 English documentation/agent-context files. Complete base..HEAD diff inspected. No implementation/schema/rating changes found.

Prioritized Findings

MERGE_BLOCKER: mandatory agent policy still contradicts current selector eligibility. docs/llm-operating-policy.md:105-111 presents catalog v2 as the active context and says Astra cannot be recommended until onboarding. This conflicts with the newly corrected paragraph at lines 71-75 and the unchanged authoritative artifacts: model-catalog.json:2 is v5, lines 521-528 contain Astra Low, and model-policy.json:3 is policy v9. Lines 350-352 likewise describe policy_version 6 in unqualified present tense. Agents consuming this policy can incorrectly exclude an already catalogued candidate or reason from obsolete content. Closure: reconcile these current-state assertions with v5/v9 and retain D-032/v2/v6 statements only as explicitly historical evidence; do not change ratings, reference assignments or selector behavior.
MERGE_BLOCKER: G08 coverage incorrectly declares an already registered Console consumer absent. docs/roadmap.md:37,61 and this PR description say no Console counterpart was found. Router #183 comment 14299, posted 23:05:48Z before this frozen commit, already identifies counterparts. I fetched actual canonical OPEN bodies: Console #2 owns producer read/auth contracts and links Router #183/#140; Console #3 owns snapshot/progress/dedup/reconnect/gap/resync consumption and links #183; Console #12 owns version-pinned consumer/browser acceptance and links #183/#186. They were created 23:02-23:04Z. The later Router #183 comment 14358 contradicts that earlier coordination record; #173 checkpoint 14389 repeats the missing-consumer conclusion. Closure: correct the matrix and delivery descriptions, explicitly supersede the contradictory current coordination conclusion, and link actual consumer owners/order. Keep these OPEN obligations distinct from implemented integration; no duplicate issue or Console implementation is needed.

No additional MERGE_BLOCKER or DEFER finding. Already registered implementation gaps are not blockers for this documentation PR.

Coverage and Terminology

All G01-G13 rows exist. Actual #174-#186 bodies and their populated current coordination comments were read, not just titles; they contain owner/source/evidence, measurable positive/negative/failure acceptance, compatibility/migration/privacy/diagnostics/UX/reuse/licensing and future authority gates. Existing #139/#140/#141/#165 bodies were checked for reuse. Sampled formal dependencies agree: #174 follows #175/#178/#179; #176 follows #185; #177 follows #174/#184; #186 follows #139/#141/#185. Backlog coverage is substantively present, but the Console disposition above is inaccurate.

Ownership/status distinctions, source-file/hash limitations, recommendation vs execution, exact gateway admission vs core pin defect, rich requirements vs generic L0, opaque variant vs effort, dispatch vs physical identity, version-specific compatibility/Responses, D-063 preservation/U-014/#180, economics/unknowns, MI bootstrap/evidence-cut migration, local outcomes, CLI/events and public artifact gates are appropriately qualified. No invented API, numerical budget, new ranker/sandbox, private infrastructure requirement or live-readiness claim was found.

Required exact tracked-name search and broader case/non-alphanumeric-separator searches returned zero matches on this SHA, covering hidden tracked context/workflows as well as source/config/tests/examples. Current #173/#187 text and the inspected registered backlog/comment text are clean. No history rewrite or retained alias explanation is required.

UX Impact

No runtime UI behavior changes. README improves recommendation-server versus gateway onboarding, protocol limitations and publication-dependent upgrades without adding recurring manual work. However, contradictory available-model guidance and falsely missing consumer ownership make configuration/coordination state misleading; these are the documentation UX consequences of the two blockers. Independent CLI improvement, actionable refusal/unknown state, no-color/JSON/pipes and admin-UI reuse remain registered.

Checks and Residual Risk

Independently checked clean/stable Git state, full diff, one-commit/no-merge scope, terminology sweeps and git diff --check. Statically checked relevant catalog/policy, worker v4, control selection, routing/admission, effort projection and native editing code. Previously completed full test/type/package gates were supplied by the implementer and recorded in this PR; I did not rerun them or claim independent execution. Exact-head Forgejo CI run 2202 was running when inspected; no green-CI claim. Formal protection requirements remain unverified, not guessed.

Distinct reviewer session is machine-observable in shared-board metadata (ses_ef6b19e21ffeeMnBHQSLA5J1Ef, distinct from main); resolved runtime model/effort identity is RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE. No named override requested; no model self-report or UI title used as attestation.

Full architecture-source bytes are unavailable; review is against the owner brief and honest supplied reference, not independent hash verification. Registered functional/live/platform gates remain open; future #180 security-critical implementation retains its separate required security gate. One fresh review completed within the 10-minute budget, zero tool retries. No files/issues edited, followups created, inference/live task, secrets/services/permissions changed, push, approval, merge or deployment.

## Substantive Verdict CHANGES_REQUESTED for documentation scope. Formal Forgejo state: COMMENT, not approval. Parent task: #173. reviewed_base: `8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b` reviewed_head: `a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a` Git HEAD, branch and canonical PR metadata agree. Worktree clean before and after review; one commit, no merges, exactly 21 English documentation/agent-context files. Complete base..HEAD diff inspected. No implementation/schema/rating changes found. ## Prioritized Findings 1. **MERGE_BLOCKER: mandatory agent policy still contradicts current selector eligibility.** `docs/llm-operating-policy.md:105-111` presents catalog v2 as the active context and says Astra cannot be recommended until onboarding. This conflicts with the newly corrected paragraph at lines 71-75 and the unchanged authoritative artifacts: `model-catalog.json:2` is v5, lines 521-528 contain Astra Low, and `model-policy.json:3` is policy v9. Lines 350-352 likewise describe policy_version 6 in unqualified present tense. Agents consuming this policy can incorrectly exclude an already catalogued candidate or reason from obsolete content. Closure: reconcile these current-state assertions with v5/v9 and retain D-032/v2/v6 statements only as explicitly historical evidence; do not change ratings, reference assignments or selector behavior. 2. **MERGE_BLOCKER: G08 coverage incorrectly declares an already registered Console consumer absent.** `docs/roadmap.md:37,61` and this PR description say no Console counterpart was found. Router [#183 comment 14299](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/issues/183#issuecomment-14299), posted 23:05:48Z before this frozen commit, already identifies counterparts. I fetched actual canonical OPEN bodies: [Console #2](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-console/issues/2) owns producer read/auth contracts and links Router #183/#140; [Console #3](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-console/issues/3) owns snapshot/progress/dedup/reconnect/gap/resync consumption and links #183; [Console #12](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-console/issues/12) owns version-pinned consumer/browser acceptance and links #183/#186. They were created 23:02-23:04Z. The later [Router #183 comment 14358](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/issues/183#issuecomment-14358) contradicts that earlier coordination record; #173 checkpoint 14389 repeats the missing-consumer conclusion. Closure: correct the matrix and delivery descriptions, explicitly supersede the contradictory current coordination conclusion, and link actual consumer owners/order. Keep these OPEN obligations distinct from implemented integration; no duplicate issue or Console implementation is needed. No additional MERGE_BLOCKER or DEFER finding. Already registered implementation gaps are not blockers for this documentation PR. ## Coverage and Terminology All G01-G13 rows exist. Actual #174-#186 bodies and their populated current coordination comments were read, not just titles; they contain owner/source/evidence, measurable positive/negative/failure acceptance, compatibility/migration/privacy/diagnostics/UX/reuse/licensing and future authority gates. Existing #139/#140/#141/#165 bodies were checked for reuse. Sampled formal dependencies agree: #174 follows #175/#178/#179; #176 follows #185; #177 follows #174/#184; #186 follows #139/#141/#185. Backlog coverage is substantively present, but the Console disposition above is inaccurate. Ownership/status distinctions, source-file/hash limitations, recommendation vs execution, exact gateway admission vs core pin defect, rich requirements vs generic L0, opaque variant vs effort, dispatch vs physical identity, version-specific compatibility/Responses, D-063 preservation/U-014/#180, economics/unknowns, MI bootstrap/evidence-cut migration, local outcomes, CLI/events and public artifact gates are appropriately qualified. No invented API, numerical budget, new ranker/sandbox, private infrastructure requirement or live-readiness claim was found. Required exact tracked-name search and broader case/non-alphanumeric-separator searches returned zero matches on this SHA, covering hidden tracked context/workflows as well as source/config/tests/examples. Current #173/#187 text and the inspected registered backlog/comment text are clean. No history rewrite or retained alias explanation is required. ## UX Impact No runtime UI behavior changes. README improves recommendation-server versus gateway onboarding, protocol limitations and publication-dependent upgrades without adding recurring manual work. However, contradictory available-model guidance and falsely missing consumer ownership make configuration/coordination state misleading; these are the documentation UX consequences of the two blockers. Independent CLI improvement, actionable refusal/unknown state, no-color/JSON/pipes and admin-UI reuse remain registered. ## Checks and Residual Risk Independently checked clean/stable Git state, full diff, one-commit/no-merge scope, terminology sweeps and `git diff --check`. Statically checked relevant catalog/policy, worker v4, control selection, routing/admission, effort projection and native editing code. Previously completed full test/type/package gates were supplied by the implementer and recorded in this PR; I did not rerun them or claim independent execution. Exact-head Forgejo CI run 2202 was running when inspected; no green-CI claim. Formal protection requirements remain unverified, not guessed. Distinct reviewer session is machine-observable in shared-board metadata (`ses_ef6b19e21ffeeMnBHQSLA5J1Ef`, distinct from main); resolved runtime model/effort identity is **RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE**. No named override requested; no model self-report or UI title used as attestation. Full architecture-source bytes are unavailable; review is against the owner brief and honest supplied reference, not independent hash verification. Registered functional/live/platform gates remain open; future #180 security-critical implementation retains its separate required security gate. One fresh review completed within the 10-minute budget, zero tool retries. No files/issues edited, followups created, inference/live task, secrets/services/permissions changed, push, approval, merge or deployment.

adrian.tkacz added 1 commit

2026-10-05 00:04:31 +00:00

Reconcile catalog guidance and Console coverage (#173 )

ci / check (pull_request) Successful in 9m36s

Details

9d592ef313

kilo reviewed

2026-10-05 00:07:11 +00:00

kilo left a comment

Narrow Final Verification

Substantive verdict: PASS_DOCUMENTATION_SCOPE.
Formal Forgejo state: COMMENT, never approval. This is the permitted narrow verification of the two blockers in initial review 694, not a second architecture/backlog review.

reviewed_base: 8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b
initial_reviewed_head: a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a
reviewed_head: 9d592ef3130fc5cd78917973a17675c7c5b1d396

Blocker Closure

CLOSED: current catalog/policy guidance. The sole remediation diff updates docs/llm-operating-policy.md to current catalog v5 / policy v9, admits Astra Low only when actual requirement/applicability/policy/capacity gates pass, and distinguishes the reviewed lower-confidence floor from the older specialist proposal. D-032's v2/v6 statements are explicitly historical. No rating, reference assignment, schema or selector behavior was changed.
CLOSED: Console consumer coverage. docs/roadmap.md now links actual Console #2 read/auth, #3 snapshot/reconnect/gaps and #12 consumer/installed/browser acceptance, retaining Router producer ownership and explicit registered-not-implemented status. Canonical Router #183 body and comments 14358 / #173 checkpoint 14389 were read: they explicitly correct and supersede the inaccurate absent-consumer conclusion, retaining comment 14299 as evidence. PR #187 now identifies these counterparts and the final SHA accurately. No duplicate issue, Console implementation or new authority is asserted.

No remaining MERGE_BLOCKER or additional DEFER finding within the narrow remediation/obvious-regression scope. Initial review 694's complete 21-file diff and registered-backlog coverage is preserved; no second substantive review was performed.

Checks and UX

Actual Git HEAD and canonical PR base/head match this cut. Worktree clean and stable before/after inspection. Exactly one remediation commit follows the initial cut, touching only the two expected Markdown files; no merges or product implementation. Complete initial..final diff inspected; full-range git diff --check passes. Exact tracked terminology and broader case/non-alphanumeric-separator sweeps return zero on final HEAD, including hidden tracked files.

UX impact: the misleading eligibility and coordination guidance is corrected. No runtime UI change, added manual step, unsupported model guarantee or fictional integration proof is introduced.

Limits and Authority

Post-remediation full gate evidence supplied by the implementer/PR: 2674 tests OK, 15 runtime probes skipped, 588.605s, built-in basedpyright 0/0/0 and separate basedpyright 0/0/0. These were not rerun by this verifier. Initial CI run 2202 success applies only to a57ed0c; final-head CI success is not claimed or verified. Branch-protection requirements remain unverified.

Runtime model/effort identity remains RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE; distinct session metadata does not prove physical model identity. Full architecture-source bytes remain unavailable, so no independent source-hash verification is claimed. Functional/live/platform/security-critical future gates remain OPEN; this PASS covers documentation only, not implementation completeness or READY_FOR_LIVE_TASK.

Completed within the two-minute narrow budget, zero retries. No files/issues edited, inference, secrets/effects, new issue, push, approval, merge or deployment. PR remains open for human review.

## Narrow Final Verification Substantive verdict: **PASS_DOCUMENTATION_SCOPE**. Formal Forgejo state: **COMMENT**, never approval. This is the permitted narrow verification of the two blockers in [initial review 694](https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/pulls/187#issuecomment-14520), not a second architecture/backlog review. reviewed_base: `8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b` initial_reviewed_head: `a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a` reviewed_head: `9d592ef3130fc5cd78917973a17675c7c5b1d396` ## Blocker Closure 1. **CLOSED: current catalog/policy guidance.** The sole remediation diff updates `docs/llm-operating-policy.md` to current catalog v5 / policy v9, admits Astra Low only when actual requirement/applicability/policy/capacity gates pass, and distinguishes the reviewed lower-confidence floor from the older specialist proposal. D-032's v2/v6 statements are explicitly historical. No rating, reference assignment, schema or selector behavior was changed. 2. **CLOSED: Console consumer coverage.** `docs/roadmap.md` now links actual Console #2 read/auth, #3 snapshot/reconnect/gaps and #12 consumer/installed/browser acceptance, retaining Router producer ownership and explicit registered-not-implemented status. Canonical Router #183 body and comments 14358 / #173 checkpoint 14389 were read: they explicitly correct and supersede the inaccurate absent-consumer conclusion, retaining comment 14299 as evidence. PR #187 now identifies these counterparts and the final SHA accurately. No duplicate issue, Console implementation or new authority is asserted. No remaining MERGE_BLOCKER or additional DEFER finding within the narrow remediation/obvious-regression scope. Initial review 694's complete 21-file diff and registered-backlog coverage is preserved; no second substantive review was performed. ## Checks and UX Actual Git HEAD and canonical PR base/head match this cut. Worktree clean and stable before/after inspection. Exactly one remediation commit follows the initial cut, touching only the two expected Markdown files; no merges or product implementation. Complete initial..final diff inspected; full-range `git diff --check` passes. Exact tracked terminology and broader case/non-alphanumeric-separator sweeps return zero on final HEAD, including hidden tracked files. **UX impact:** the misleading eligibility and coordination guidance is corrected. No runtime UI change, added manual step, unsupported model guarantee or fictional integration proof is introduced. ## Limits and Authority Post-remediation full gate evidence supplied by the implementer/PR: 2674 tests OK, 15 runtime probes skipped, 588.605s, built-in basedpyright 0/0/0 and separate basedpyright 0/0/0. These were not rerun by this verifier. Initial CI run 2202 success applies only to a57ed0c; final-head CI success is not claimed or verified. Branch-protection requirements remain unverified. Runtime model/effort identity remains **RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE**; distinct session metadata does not prove physical model identity. Full architecture-source bytes remain unavailable, so no independent source-hash verification is claimed. Functional/live/platform/security-critical future gates remain OPEN; this PASS covers documentation only, not implementation completeness or READY_FOR_LIVE_TASK. Completed within the two-minute narrow budget, zero retries. No files/issues edited, inference, secrets/effects, new issue, push, approval, merge or deployment. PR remains open for human review.

kilo commented

2026-10-05 00:10:49 +00:00

Author

Member

Full Final Reviewer Report

Delivery Cut

Canonical repository: BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router. Main task: #173. PR: BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router#187, target develop, OPEN / UNMERGED.

Base: 8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b.
Final/reviewed HEAD: 9d592ef3130fc5cd78917973a17675c7c5b1d396.
Initial reviewed HEAD: a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a.
Branch: docs/173-creatidy-system-alignment. Two issue-scoped documentation commits, no merge commits, latest canonical develop still equals the base, clean worktree.

Documentation and registered work passed independent review after the single remediation. Final-head CI is NOT_OBSERVED at this report cut; merge readiness is not asserted. Initial-head CI success is not reused for final HEAD. Human review/merge gate remains; neither the main issue nor functional gaps are claimed integrated/Done.

Every Changed File

.kilo/rules/40-llm-operating-policy.md
AGENTS.md
README.md
docs/architecture.md
docs/capability-model.md
docs/capacity-model.md
docs/control-surface.md
docs/decisions.md
docs/execution-surface.md
docs/llm-operating-policy.md
docs/m10-acceptance.md
docs/machine-interfaces.md
docs/model-calibration.md
docs/product.md
docs/release-engineering.md
docs/roadmap.md
docs/security.md
docs/selection-policy.md
docs/worker-protocol.md
docs/zcode-adapter-stage2-evidence.md
examples/agent-routing-prompt.md

D-068 records agreed Kernel/Router/MI/Console ownership, accepted-result economics, status discipline and full known scope. D-056's Router-owned agent/orchestration suggestion is superseded; D-047 cancellation was already superseded by D-061/D-063. D-063's working workspace-editing lane is preserved as U-014/#180 conflict, not conformance or permission to extend access. Catalog v5/policy v9, worker v4, recommendation-vs-execution onboarding, unpublished-artifact upgrade limits, historical/live records and README history index were corrected without changing implementation or ratings.

Concrete new exposure/API/flags, MI admission/calibration, event transport and native-agent migration options remain proposed/To prove in their owning issues. No protocol version, numeric economic/quality limit or new infrastructure was invented. Source filename/supplied SHA-256 is retained; full source bytes were unavailable locally, so the owner brief is the basis and no independent hash verification is claimed.

G01-G13 Coverage

Gap	Ownership and current evidence	Actual disposition
G01	Kernel harness control; Kernel #11 recommender consumption is not gateway proof	Kernel #47 proof/#53 adapter; Router #174/#181 producer/compatibility only
G02	Kernel approved ordinary-task intake; Router machine v1 accepts requirements, not tasks	Kernel #49; no local intake implementation
G03	Kernel durable product review/remediation; Router development review is not that feature	Kernel #54; no local review-loop implementation
G04	Router SelectionDecision differs from RouteDecision; exact gateway admission exists; core pin defect reproduced	#174 public consumer contract; #178 core defect; Kernel #52 Attempt consumer
G05	Existing multidimensional requirements/tightening/effective limits; generic unprofiled execution L0 is not rich specification proof	#175; Kernel #49/#51; MI #14 calibration identity
G06	Catalog/tracks are working bootstrap; no MI consumer; MI #9 is bounded proof	#176/#185; MI #13 publication/#15 producer; Kernel #55 actual-used provenance
G07	AuditRecord/UsageAccounting are call-level, not accepted-result exports	#177; Kernel #58 local export/#56 budgets; MI #17 optional sharing decision only
G08	CLI raw fields/control/admin UI exist; no demonstrated shared Console feed	#182 CLI, #183 Router events, existing #140 UI; Console #2/#3 consumers/#12 acceptance; Kernel #57/MI #16 own producers
G09	D-063 deliberately edits authorized project; historical PR #161 evidence does not resolve lifecycle ownership	U-014/#180; Kernel #50 isolation/#52 affected-lane gate; no second sandbox
G10	Catalog effort explicit but gateway derives effort from variant; plan lane/dispatch audit not physical identity proof; worker v4	#179 identity/effort, #181 version-specific protocol/Responses subset; Kernel #47/#52 consumers
G11	Kernel tasks/workspaces/cache; Router has bounded request reservations and concrete cancellation gaps	Kernel #59/#61; existing #165 cancellation; no invented Router scheduler/concurrency defect
G12	Pools/entitlements/rate-only SpendingLimit/UsageAccounting; not task-total enforcement	#184 source/call/access proof; Kernel #56 aggregate/enforce; #177 local path analysis
G13	Independent contract versions/release seams; public publication/platform/live gates unclosed	#185 compatibility/#186 uncovered artifacts; reuse #139 TLS/#141 composed acceptance; Kernel #62/#60, MI #18/#19 receipts

Exact canonical URLs and evidence/document mapping for every row are in docs/roadmap.md. All newly registered functional obligations remain OPEN; registration is not implementation.

Actual New Tasks and Priorities

All are Router-owned coherent outcomes, with source/G IDs, evidence vs hypotheses, measurable positive/negative/failure criteria, dependencies, compatibility/migration/diagnostics/security, mandatory revision/license/semantics/reuse proof and separate future authority/access.

Issue / title	Priority rationale and dependency/result
#174 Prove executable recommendation/admission/exact-pin contract with Kernel	First integration prerequisite; depends175/178/179, producer -> Kernel52 -> authorized receipt
#175 Map rich Kernel task/harness requirements into monotone eligibility	First quality prerequisite; Kernel49/51 producer, MI14 evidence; no second scale
#176 Consume admitted MI snapshots with provenance/safe catalog migration	Foundational after185/MI13/15; preserve bootstrap until proof, Kernel55 retains references
#177 Explicit local outcome export consumption/cautious task-cost calibration	After174/184, Kernel58 producer; no automatic upload/learning
#178 Fix route_request exact model-variant narrowing	First reproduced correctness blocker; preserve correctly exact gateway admission
#179 Remove gateway effort-from-variant inference/prove identity	First correctness/UX guarantee blocker; independent opaque-variant fix, native-lane guarantees separately gated
#180 Reconcile backend-native agents/workspace authority	First affected-lane ownership/security prerequisite; owner-reviewed disposition/migration, future security_critical gate
#181 Versioned harness/protocol compatibility/evidenced Responses subset	After identity/requirements; Kernel47/52, no universal protocol promise
#182 Readable CLI snapshot/details preserving JSON/pipes	Independent operator lane, no Console dependency
#183 Authorized Router state/reconnectable events	After140/179 data; Console2/3 consume,12 receives after183/140/186
#184 Access-mode/quota-pool/call-cost enforcement boundaries	First honest-guarantee prerequisite; Router call facts -> Kernel56 whole-path budget
#185 Router/Kernel/MI contract-artifact upgrades/migrations	Foundational compatibility proof, not universal version/common DB
#186 Public artifacts/platform distribution acceptance	Required product-completion lane after139/141/185, no release/inference authority

Existing #139/#140/#141/#165 were reused, not cloned, updated into unrelated scope or silently closed. Formal local dependency edges were actually registered. No priority-label taxonomy was created.

Current Inconsistencies and Deviations to Address First

These product issues remain open despite documentary PASS:

#178: routing_core narrows a resource pin to all bound identities. Existing synthetic fixture reproduced requested max -> routed medium while exact admission returned max. Effect: library consumers cannot trust full pin. Close with exact identity/refusal and authorization/quality/staleness negatives; do not claim public gateway substitution.
#179: gateway discovery/logical resolution reconstruct effort from opaque variant, including plan despite lane effort null. Effect: inconsistent discoverable/accepted settings and overstated identity. Close with catalog-derived effort, plan/opaque/null/none negatives and explicit requested/resolved/dispatched/observed guarantees.
#175/#174: generic L0/no minima and model-only public select do not prove rich authorized task quality or executable route consumption. Effect: Kernel cannot infer a valid exact resource/Attempt binding. Close with actual requirement producer-consumer mapping, preserved pin/effort and explained no-candidate/admission negatives.
#180: integrated native coding backend edits the project but agreed workspace/harness lifecycle belongs to Kernel. Effect: unproved authority/co-editing safety. Close with supported-interface evidence, explicit owner disposition, safe operator/config migration and Kernel acceptance, not silent removal.
#184: configured subscription entitlement/rate ceiling/uncontrolled output are not observed free access or total spend guarantee. Effect: false no-PAYG/budget confidence. Close with actual hard access enforcement, pool/helper/overflow/unknown evidence and Kernel accounting, without invented numeric budgets.

Remaining full scope is registered, not dropped: MI migration, local outcomes, readable CLI, event/Console consumption, compatibility and public/platform/installed acceptance.

Cross-Product Contracts and Owner Decisions

Kernel49/51 approved specs -> Router175 interpretation -> Router174/178/179 exact producer -> Kernel52 Attempt-bound consumption after47 control/backend proof. Affected coding lanes require180 disposition first. MI13/15 lawful publication -> Router176 adoption after185 compatibility -> Kernel55 provenance. Router184 facts -> Kernel56 budgets -> Kernel58 explicit local export -> Router177 analysis; MI17 is only separate optional sharing decision. Router183/Kernel57/MI16 each own state; actual Console2/3 consume and12 receives. Producer migrations/distribution185/186, MI18, Kernel62 precede composed Router141/MI19/Kernel60 acceptance. Only Router was mutated.

Owner decisions genuinely needed before future implementation: U-014 native editing boundary/migration; concrete new/versioned public contracts where existing seams do not suffice; MI admission/calibration and lossy semantic mappings; unsupported cost guarantee handling; real inference/effects, provider/platform/service/signing/publication access. This session grants none. Routine catalog/Console review findings required corrections, not new architectural owner decisions.

Terminology Remediation and Mutable Writes

Occurrence classification: architecture's unnecessary naming explanation and mutable #173 body explanation were removed as unnecessary. Neither was guessed/replaced as Kernel vs Router; direct actual names suffice. D-068 records the owner's superseding instruction without alias/glossary/rename. The owner's exact git grep and broad case/punctuation/separator sweep returned zero matches on final clean HEAD, including hidden tracked agent/workflow files; no blind replacement. All21open bodies and19current comments audited, PR170 clean/comments0, new187 clean. No historical evidence needed retention in inspected scope; Git history, closed historical records and immutable session/tool receipts were not rewritten. Unavailable external source bytes were not falsely audited.

Actual Forgejo writes: created parent173 and child174-186; updated bodies173/180/183; created coordination comments174:14327,175:14334,176:14339,177:14349,179:14353,181:14363,183:14358,184:14369,185:14372,186:14381; edited14369 link formatting and14358 Console coverage; parent checkpoint14389 created/explicitly corrected and delivery14510 added. PR187 created/updated on same branch. Independent reviews694/comment14520 and695/comment14556 were actually posted by the distinct reviewer session. This full final report is an additional PR comment, not a repository implementation change. No other repo or unrelated historical surface was mutated.

Gates, Review and Remaining Merge Gate

Final full make check after remediation: 2674 OK,15runtime probes skipped,588.605s, built-in uv-managed basedpyright 0errors/0warnings/0notes. Separate final basedpyright0/0/0; uv sync passed; focused interface guardrails42OK; package-check allwheel/sdist/isolatedCLI/MCP/REST/defaultsPASS; new relative links/anchors/ADR/index checked; final full-range whitespace clean. No check weakened and no read test claimed executed. Skipped real-runtime probes/Windows/live product integration remain separate registered gates.

Initial whole-PR/backlog review694: CHANGES_REQUESTED at a57, formalCOMMENT, exactly2documentation blockers. One remediation corrected both; narrow final review695: PASS_DOCUMENTATION_SCOPE at9d592ef, formalCOMMENT, no remaining narrow blocker/DEFER, original whole-PR coverage retained. UX: misleading eligibility/coordination resolved, no runtime/manual-step change. Reviewer model/effort RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE; distinct Task-session dispatch is verified, not physical identity. Source bytes unavailable. Initial/reviewer retries0; no budget reset; original120min ends00:11Z.

CI2202 SUCCESS (9m38s) is only initial a57. Final9d filtered canonical CI query returned no visible run: final-head gate NOT_OBSERVED, not PASS/failure guessed. Branch-protection inspection denied admin permission, so formal requirements are unknown and were not modified. PR remains OPEN/unmerged, formalCOMMENT is not APPROVED; owner merge readiness is conditional on required final-head CI/approval gates. Document delivery is independently verified, but integration, live task readiness and all functional gaps remain unclosed.

No product implementation/schema/rating change, real task/product inference, secret/service/permission/branch-protection/main change, approval/merge/release/deploy occurred. Only safe deterministic local checks, synthetic localhost harnesses and isolated package smoke were run.

## Full Final Reviewer Report ### Delivery Cut Canonical repository: BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router. Main task: #173. PR: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/pulls/187, target develop, **OPEN / UNMERGED**. Base: `8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b`. Final/reviewed HEAD: `9d592ef3130fc5cd78917973a17675c7c5b1d396`. Initial reviewed HEAD: `a57ed0c4e6154230961480acbadabcffacb8bd4a`. Branch: docs/173-creatidy-system-alignment. Two issue-scoped documentation commits, no merge commits, latest canonical develop still equals the base, clean worktree. Documentation and registered work passed independent review after the single remediation. **Final-head CI is NOT_OBSERVED at this report cut; merge readiness is not asserted.** Initial-head CI success is not reused for final HEAD. Human review/merge gate remains; neither the main issue nor functional gaps are claimed integrated/Done. ### Every Changed File ```text .kilo/rules/40-llm-operating-policy.md AGENTS.md README.md docs/architecture.md docs/capability-model.md docs/capacity-model.md docs/control-surface.md docs/decisions.md docs/execution-surface.md docs/llm-operating-policy.md docs/m10-acceptance.md docs/machine-interfaces.md docs/model-calibration.md docs/product.md docs/release-engineering.md docs/roadmap.md docs/security.md docs/selection-policy.md docs/worker-protocol.md docs/zcode-adapter-stage2-evidence.md examples/agent-routing-prompt.md ``` D-068 records agreed Kernel/Router/MI/Console ownership, accepted-result economics, status discipline and full known scope. D-056's Router-owned agent/orchestration suggestion is superseded; D-047 cancellation was already superseded by D-061/D-063. D-063's working workspace-editing lane is preserved as U-014/#180 conflict, not conformance or permission to extend access. Catalog v5/policy v9, worker v4, recommendation-vs-execution onboarding, unpublished-artifact upgrade limits, historical/live records and README history index were corrected without changing implementation or ratings. Concrete new exposure/API/flags, MI admission/calibration, event transport and native-agent migration options remain proposed/To prove in their owning issues. No protocol version, numeric economic/quality limit or new infrastructure was invented. Source filename/supplied SHA-256 is retained; full source bytes were unavailable locally, so the owner brief is the basis and no independent hash verification is claimed. ### G01-G13 Coverage | Gap | Ownership and current evidence | Actual disposition | | --- | --- | --- | | G01 | Kernel harness control; Kernel #11 recommender consumption is not gateway proof | Kernel #47 proof/#53 adapter; Router #174/#181 producer/compatibility only | | G02 | Kernel approved ordinary-task intake; Router machine v1 accepts requirements, not tasks | Kernel #49; no local intake implementation | | G03 | Kernel durable product review/remediation; Router development review is not that feature | Kernel #54; no local review-loop implementation | | G04 | Router SelectionDecision differs from RouteDecision; exact gateway admission exists; core pin defect reproduced | #174 public consumer contract; #178 core defect; Kernel #52 Attempt consumer | | G05 | Existing multidimensional requirements/tightening/effective limits; generic unprofiled execution L0 is not rich specification proof | #175; Kernel #49/#51; MI #14 calibration identity | | G06 | Catalog/tracks are working bootstrap; no MI consumer; MI #9 is bounded proof | #176/#185; MI #13 publication/#15 producer; Kernel #55 actual-used provenance | | G07 | AuditRecord/UsageAccounting are call-level, not accepted-result exports | #177; Kernel #58 local export/#56 budgets; MI #17 optional sharing decision only | | G08 | CLI raw fields/control/admin UI exist; no demonstrated shared Console feed | #182 CLI, #183 Router events, existing #140 UI; Console #2/#3 consumers/#12 acceptance; Kernel #57/MI #16 own producers | | G09 | D-063 deliberately edits authorized project; historical PR #161 evidence does not resolve lifecycle ownership | U-014/#180; Kernel #50 isolation/#52 affected-lane gate; no second sandbox | | G10 | Catalog effort explicit but gateway derives effort from variant; plan lane/dispatch audit not physical identity proof; worker v4 | #179 identity/effort, #181 version-specific protocol/Responses subset; Kernel #47/#52 consumers | | G11 | Kernel tasks/workspaces/cache; Router has bounded request reservations and concrete cancellation gaps | Kernel #59/#61; existing #165 cancellation; no invented Router scheduler/concurrency defect | | G12 | Pools/entitlements/rate-only SpendingLimit/UsageAccounting; not task-total enforcement | #184 source/call/access proof; Kernel #56 aggregate/enforce; #177 local path analysis | | G13 | Independent contract versions/release seams; public publication/platform/live gates unclosed | #185 compatibility/#186 uncovered artifacts; reuse #139 TLS/#141 composed acceptance; Kernel #62/#60, MI #18/#19 receipts | Exact canonical URLs and evidence/document mapping for every row are in docs/roadmap.md. All newly registered functional obligations remain OPEN; registration is not implementation. ### Actual New Tasks and Priorities All are Router-owned coherent outcomes, with source/G IDs, evidence vs hypotheses, measurable positive/negative/failure criteria, dependencies, compatibility/migration/diagnostics/security, mandatory revision/license/semantics/reuse proof and separate future authority/access. | Issue / title | Priority rationale and dependency/result | | --- | --- | | #174 Prove executable recommendation/admission/exact-pin contract with Kernel | First integration prerequisite; depends175/178/179, producer -> Kernel52 -> authorized receipt | | #175 Map rich Kernel task/harness requirements into monotone eligibility | First quality prerequisite; Kernel49/51 producer, MI14 evidence; no second scale | | #176 Consume admitted MI snapshots with provenance/safe catalog migration | Foundational after185/MI13/15; preserve bootstrap until proof, Kernel55 retains references | | #177 Explicit local outcome export consumption/cautious task-cost calibration | After174/184, Kernel58 producer; no automatic upload/learning | | #178 Fix route_request exact model-variant narrowing | First reproduced correctness blocker; preserve correctly exact gateway admission | | #179 Remove gateway effort-from-variant inference/prove identity | First correctness/UX guarantee blocker; independent opaque-variant fix, native-lane guarantees separately gated | | #180 Reconcile backend-native agents/workspace authority | First affected-lane ownership/security prerequisite; owner-reviewed disposition/migration, future security_critical gate | | #181 Versioned harness/protocol compatibility/evidenced Responses subset | After identity/requirements; Kernel47/52, no universal protocol promise | | #182 Readable CLI snapshot/details preserving JSON/pipes | Independent operator lane, no Console dependency | | #183 Authorized Router state/reconnectable events | After140/179 data; Console2/3 consume,12 receives after183/140/186 | | #184 Access-mode/quota-pool/call-cost enforcement boundaries | First honest-guarantee prerequisite; Router call facts -> Kernel56 whole-path budget | | #185 Router/Kernel/MI contract-artifact upgrades/migrations | Foundational compatibility proof, not universal version/common DB | | #186 Public artifacts/platform distribution acceptance | Required product-completion lane after139/141/185, no release/inference authority | Existing #139/#140/#141/#165 were reused, not cloned, updated into unrelated scope or silently closed. Formal local dependency edges were actually registered. No priority-label taxonomy was created. ### Current Inconsistencies and Deviations to Address First These product issues remain open despite documentary PASS: 1. **#178:** routing_core narrows a resource pin to all bound identities. Existing synthetic fixture reproduced requested max -> routed medium while exact admission returned max. Effect: library consumers cannot trust full pin. Close with exact identity/refusal and authorization/quality/staleness negatives; do not claim public gateway substitution. 2. **#179:** gateway discovery/logical resolution reconstruct effort from opaque variant, including plan despite lane effort null. Effect: inconsistent discoverable/accepted settings and overstated identity. Close with catalog-derived effort, plan/opaque/null/none negatives and explicit requested/resolved/dispatched/observed guarantees. 3. **#175/#174:** generic L0/no minima and model-only public select do not prove rich authorized task quality or executable route consumption. Effect: Kernel cannot infer a valid exact resource/Attempt binding. Close with actual requirement producer-consumer mapping, preserved pin/effort and explained no-candidate/admission negatives. 4. **#180:** integrated native coding backend edits the project but agreed workspace/harness lifecycle belongs to Kernel. Effect: unproved authority/co-editing safety. Close with supported-interface evidence, explicit owner disposition, safe operator/config migration and Kernel acceptance, not silent removal. 5. **#184:** configured subscription entitlement/rate ceiling/uncontrolled output are not observed free access or total spend guarantee. Effect: false no-PAYG/budget confidence. Close with actual hard access enforcement, pool/helper/overflow/unknown evidence and Kernel accounting, without invented numeric budgets. Remaining full scope is registered, not dropped: MI migration, local outcomes, readable CLI, event/Console consumption, compatibility and public/platform/installed acceptance. ### Cross-Product Contracts and Owner Decisions Kernel49/51 approved specs -> Router175 interpretation -> Router174/178/179 exact producer -> Kernel52 Attempt-bound consumption after47 control/backend proof. Affected coding lanes require180 disposition first. MI13/15 lawful publication -> Router176 adoption after185 compatibility -> Kernel55 provenance. Router184 facts -> Kernel56 budgets -> Kernel58 explicit local export -> Router177 analysis; MI17 is only separate optional sharing decision. Router183/Kernel57/MI16 each own state; actual Console2/3 consume and12 receives. Producer migrations/distribution185/186, MI18, Kernel62 precede composed Router141/MI19/Kernel60 acceptance. Only Router was mutated. Owner decisions genuinely needed before future implementation: U-014 native editing boundary/migration; concrete new/versioned public contracts where existing seams do not suffice; MI admission/calibration and lossy semantic mappings; unsupported cost guarantee handling; real inference/effects, provider/platform/service/signing/publication access. This session grants none. Routine catalog/Console review findings required corrections, not new architectural owner decisions. ### Terminology Remediation and Mutable Writes Occurrence classification: architecture's unnecessary naming explanation and mutable #173 body explanation were **removed as unnecessary**. Neither was guessed/replaced as Kernel vs Router; direct actual names suffice. D-068 records the owner's superseding instruction without alias/glossary/rename. The owner's exact git grep and broad case/punctuation/separator sweep returned **zero matches on final clean HEAD**, including hidden tracked agent/workflow files; no blind replacement. All21open bodies and19current comments audited, PR170 clean/comments0, new187 clean. No historical evidence needed retention in inspected scope; Git history, closed historical records and immutable session/tool receipts were not rewritten. Unavailable external source bytes were not falsely audited. Actual Forgejo writes: created parent173 and child174-186; updated bodies173/180/183; created coordination comments174:14327,175:14334,176:14339,177:14349,179:14353,181:14363,183:14358,184:14369,185:14372,186:14381; edited14369 link formatting and14358 Console coverage; parent checkpoint14389 created/explicitly corrected and delivery14510 added. PR187 created/updated on same branch. Independent reviews694/comment14520 and695/comment14556 were actually posted by the distinct reviewer session. This full final report is an additional PR comment, not a repository implementation change. No other repo or unrelated historical surface was mutated. ### Gates, Review and Remaining Merge Gate Final full make check after remediation: **2674 OK,15runtime probes skipped,588.605s**, built-in uv-managed basedpyright **0errors/0warnings/0notes**. Separate final basedpyright0/0/0; uv sync passed; focused interface guardrails42OK; package-check allwheel/sdist/isolatedCLI/MCP/REST/defaultsPASS; new relative links/anchors/ADR/index checked; final full-range whitespace clean. No check weakened and no read test claimed executed. Skipped real-runtime probes/Windows/live product integration remain separate registered gates. Initial whole-PR/backlog review694: CHANGES_REQUESTED at a57, formalCOMMENT, exactly2documentation blockers. **One remediation** corrected both; narrow final review695: **PASS_DOCUMENTATION_SCOPE at9d592ef**, formalCOMMENT, no remaining narrow blocker/DEFER, original whole-PR coverage retained. UX: misleading eligibility/coordination resolved, no runtime/manual-step change. Reviewer model/effort **RUNTIME_UNOBSERVABLE**; distinct Task-session dispatch is verified, not physical identity. Source bytes unavailable. Initial/reviewer retries0; no budget reset; original120min ends00:11Z. CI2202 SUCCESS (9m38s) is **only initial a57**. Final9d filtered canonical CI query returned **no visible run**: final-head gate NOT_OBSERVED, not PASS/failure guessed. Branch-protection inspection denied admin permission, so formal requirements are unknown and were not modified. PR remains OPEN/unmerged, formalCOMMENT is not APPROVED; owner merge readiness is conditional on required final-head CI/approval gates. Document delivery is independently verified, but integration, live task readiness and all functional gaps remain unclosed. No product implementation/schema/rating change, real task/product inference, secret/service/permission/branch-protection/main change, approval/merge/release/deploy occurred. Only safe deterministic local checks, synthetic localhost harnesses and isolated package smoke were run.

adrian.tkacz approved these changes

2026-10-05 08:26:13 +00:00

adrian.tkacz merged commit e2c3acd1dd into develop

2026-10-05 08:26:18 +00:00

adrian.tkacz deleted branch docs/173-creatidy-system-alignment

2026-10-05 08:26:19 +00:00

adrian.tkacz referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-10-05 08:26:20 +00:00

Merge pull request 'Align Scarcity Router with Creatidy architecture and register actionable gaps (#173)' (#187) from docs/173-creatidy-system-alignment into develop