[Kernel][G12] Account for and enforce whole-task budgets across calls, tools and review #56
Labels
No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
Depends on
#58 [Kernel][G07] Deliver versioned private outcome and full-cost evidence export
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
#60 [Kernel][G01-G13] Accept the installed controlled-task path end to end
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
#106 Deliver ordinary Program execution with shared pull and managed push handoffs
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
#48 [Kernel][G01 G12] Repair bounded-task lifetime, recovery and original deadline enforcement
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
#49 [Kernel][G02 G05] Prepare and authorize versioned specifications from ordinary issues
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
#54 [Kernel][G03] Implement durable candidate-bound product review and remediation
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
Reference
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#56
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Priority: P1
Type: implementation.
Current Scope And Supersession
Published under the owner's 2026-10-27 bounded architecture/backlog mandate #103. PR #104 is merged at
ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4; pending/prepared wording at that historical cut is not current integration status. This active content supersedes conflicting historical descriptive scope, priorities and dependencies, including dated comments, without changing their evidence or review counters. The complete pre-update body is preserved unchanged under## Historical Scope And Evidencebelow. Prepared A is registered #105 and B is registered #106. Publication does not select implementation or establish overall alignment acceptance.P1 means core authority/data-integrity foundation or complete everyday work capability on the critical path under the integrated P0-P3 Priority Contract; lower number is earlier, not a budget or deadline. This is the single active priority. Eligibility/evidence precede priority; ranking never bypasses prerequisites, owner decisions, STOP_REVISE or exact invalid/wontfix/duplicate exclusions. Ranked-before-unranked, explicit dependency ordering, oldest registration/tie by ID and existing /loop authority remain unchanged.
Goal
Enforce owner-configured project/work envelopes and preserve whole-result consumption across attempts/review/remediation/tools/retries.
Why
Current count policy and per-command timeout are not whole-work authority or economic bounds. Retain prior shape-spec work.
Scope
Single-core reservations, count/concurrency/time/money policies, bounded output/process work, receipt-corrected resource vector, unknown handling and recovery, independently of model inventory.
Acceptance Criteria
Dependencies
Accepted #48/#49/#54; no blanket #52/#57/MI prerequisite. Receiving SR private local
source_call_factsthrough an eventual remote transport is UNVERIFIED until that exact seam is checked; do not invent an endpoint or gate all work on it. Real budgets required only before real admissions.Constraints
ADR 0012 and ADR 0011 apply. Preserve inward dependencies (
adapters -> ports -> core) and the self-contained public core; no private repository or live-service dependency for core/offline tests. No new coding agent, tracker, catalogue, gateway or generic workflow DSL. No credential/runtime-state copying. Preserve old bytes/IDs/unknowns and #53 CLOSED / NOT IMPLEMENTED, PR #85 CLOSED / UNMERGED; its strict-expiry negative and review history are not an accepted adapter or pass. Synthetic offline tests plus the installed path and independent exact-subject review are required. Live inference/effects/releases require separate authority; this publication grants no accounts, live spending, private data access, merge, release or deployment. Preserve PR #100 as a negative receipt, not full route acceptance, and PR #101 as provenance-only, not full knowledge-content acceptance. Historical evidence and all review counters remain immutable.Links
ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4).ace7175e08/docs/adr/0012-unified-work-coordination-and-drivers.mdace7175e08/docs/adr/0011-task-level-authority-and-trusted-development.mdace7175e08/docs/architecture/target.mdace7175e08/docs/architecture/migration.mdace7175e08/docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.mdace7175e08/docs/architecture/successor.md (g12-existing-cost-shape-specification-planned)Historical Scope And Evidence
Goal
Owner: Kernel task authorization/accounting; Router owns call admission, account/quota policy and execution costs at its boundary. Preserve a multidimensional whole-task budget/consumption ledger covering implementation, review, remediation, tools/tests, retries and auxiliary calls with sourced unknowns and honest enforcement limits. Source: shared architecture v1.0, sections 1-8, 9.2-9.4, 10-18 via #46 brief.
Why
Cheapest-token selection and per-request rate/deadline limits do not bound the accepted-result journey. Hidden SDK/harness/gateway retries can turn one intended operation into multiple costs or effects; an unknown result cannot justify changing route and hiding the uncertainty.
Current Evidence
Kernel
eb4f4a2956: BudgetPolicy in core/domain.py bounds Attempts/active count; core/outcomes.py models unitful sourced usage but task application does not collect it. run_task deadline bounds dispatch only and checks have separate timeouts; #48 repairs envelope/lifetime/freshness. TaskChecks _run_command uses subprocess capture_output before tail truncation, no complete whole-task byte/descendant bounds. Router SpendingLimit is a per-Mtoken rate ceiling, not total-task budget; native hidden retry accounting is unproved. Router #184 owns corresponding call/access-mode proof.Scope
Link task/Attempt/session/route/call/tool/candidate and journal consumption/corrections with separate money/currency, quota units, tokens, compute/wall time and owner attention. Specify approval/enforcement boundaries before implementation, preserve unknown vs estimate/report/measurement, reconcile retries and uncertain effects, enforce whole-path deadlines/admission and bounded command output/descendants. Do not guess numerical limits or reset/credit/overflow authority.
Acceptance Criteria
CLOCK_BOOTTIMEprojection anchored to the original wall deadline and host boot identity. Same-boot recovery reuses the persisted projection; it must not derive a later expiry from the current wall clock. Deadline expiry stops new Kernel dispatch and initiates bounded cancellation. If the clock, its reading, or boot identity is unavailable or unverifiable, or the boot identity changes, fail closed: deny dispatch and a successor Attempt and keep the Attemptunknownpending reconciliation. Tests use controlled clocks to cover suspend/resume across expiry, wall-clock rollback after projection creation, reboot/boot-ID mismatch, unavailable/unverifiable clock identity, and same-boot recovery without projection renewal. Local native effects and provider usage during an active turn/termination interval are recorded as observed orunknown, never assumed zero or rolled back. No strict per-syscall expiry is claimed. In-flight overrun/unknown accounting is explicit with tested pause/reconciliation behavior.Router #184's call/quota evidence and approved numeric task budget remain required.
unknownorcancel_uncertain, and block acceptance, publication, retry and any conflicting successor Attempt. Recovery must not infer settlement from a terminal turn or reacquire a numeric PID. Scope uncertainty to the affected Attempt/resources; do not block independent eligible tasks with non-conflicting authority and workspaces.Reuse
Reuse core BudgetPolicy/OutcomeObservation/correction and receipt dedupe, Operation journal, reference bounded cancellation and existing bounded Git transport; adopt Router #184 cost/admission evidence and proved harness usage events after exact revision/license/semantics/security/negative/dependency-maintenance check. No second quota collector, policy DSL or finance service.
Dependencies And Priority
Acceptance safety prerequisite after #48 lifetime, #49 approved policy, #52 route identity and #54 product review; parallel specification of existing cost shapes is possible. Producer Router #184 must prove call/quota/access boundaries. Full outcome export consumes this ledger.
Constraints And Permissions
No invented cost/quality/time thresholds, private telemetry copied into repo, provider pricing/catalog or routing policy. Synthetic proof first; calibrated live billing/retry/attention evidence needs separately authorized inference/service/tool effects and owner numerical budget. Registration grants none; development review budget remains separate.
Links
Non-Goals
No quota replenishment, learned pricing/routing, global exactly-once promise or live spending authorization.
kilo referenced this issue from Creatidy/scarcity-router2026-10-04 23:43:29 +00:00
The explicitly permitted parallel cost-shape specification slice is committed as
a2f910b87aadb79543f1df101eb9c16273834866and submitted in PR #94: #94. It documents source-groundedBudgetPolicy,UsageObservation, outcome correction/Attempt lineage,QuotaSnapshot, and Router #184 billing/evidence boundaries, without implementing whole-task aggregation or inventing thresholds.make checkandmake package-checkpassed. This does not complete #56; its issue remains open pending remaining producer evidence and functional acceptance.Normal /loop Selection And Functional Implementation Start
Owner-authorized continuation
kernel-loop-20261027T005900Zfollows actual ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED acceptance in #103comment19309 and reviewed documentation integration PR107 / develope2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5.Fresh postacceptance SELECT exhausted14openactualissues plus emptypage; exact wontfix15/30/37/44 exclusions, tenremainingbodies/21uniquecomments, current28nativeedges/inverses and boundedacceptedpredecessors. Currentreadyorder: #56 P1 -> #59 P1 -> #105 P1 -> #62 P2. #56 is selected by P1/eligibility/oldestregistration, not by historicalplan or existingPR. Fresh current issue/dependencies #48/#49/#54 and fetched clean base were revalidated before substantive delivery. No live #56PR exists; prior PR94 is preserved as shape-specification-only, not functional acceptance.
Ordinary branch:
issue-56-work-budget-enforcementfrom exact basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5. IMPLEMENT phase has started for the COMPLETE active AC1-6: configured atomic project/work reservations; original verified suspend-inclusive clock/recovery; bounded work/output/retry and settlement uncertainty; unitful corrected/deduplicated unknown-aware accounting; refusal of unsupported hard-cap claims; installed/reopen/crash/race/exhaustion tests on actual enforcement. Shared application seams remain inward and reusable by later #59/#105/#106 without implementing their separate whole scopes.One bounded internal implementation task is the sole checkout writer while active; primary remains sole loop orchestrator and owns commits/PR/review/merge. No additional Agent Manager session/worktree/controller. Prior #56 native review ordinal1/10 from PR94 remains consumed; the first new whole-PR review must reserve ordinal2, never reset. No new review or functional acceptance claimed yet.
No production numeric budgets, live spending/inference, secrets/realprofiles, realkeymigration or external repository mutation is required or authorized for this offline implementation. Optional future remote SR184 facts remain UNVERIFIED lane-specific evidence, not a blanket #52/MI/Console gate. No billing/strict inference/native-syscall guarantee will be inferred from unknown facts. New independent exact-HEAD review, required makecheck/packagecheck and canonicalcurrentness remain mandatory before any allowed normal PR integration or full issue closure.
Functional PR And Independent Remediation
PR #108: #108
Initial HEAD
18c693b166ad53ea54f9e02466c927e36d46c696, base/merge-basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5.23files, actual budget/clock/streaming/admission/usage enforcement plus installed regressions; normal owner-authored commit/push. No merge/closure.Fresh native independent whole-PR reviewer
ses_e84decf50ffegS39x552U6Zauu, conserved ordinal 2/10 (prior PR94 ordinal1 preserved), returned REQUEST_CHANGES on those exact refs:Reviewer independently ran both required offline gates: makecheck1535passed/85explicitnative-prerequisite skips/106subtests and packagecheckPASS; these passes do not override semantic findings. Parent makeauditPASS. No native-isolation/live/productionbilling claim.
All four are ordinary in-scope engineering remediation, not new owner architecture/authority decisions. The bounded implementation task is fixing them and adding counterexample/recovery regressions as the sole checkout writer. Parent retains the same loop orchestration; no review budget reset, stale approval, self-review substitution, amend/force or external repository mutation. Next whole-PR invocation must reserve ordinal3 against the new exact HEAD after normal remediation commit and complete validation. Issue remains OPEN, PR108 UNMERGED.
Whole-PR Review 3/10: Further In-Scope Remediation
Normal remediation commit
fd8fef101614fee7c021c32257a767e07e6e21a0on PR108 preserves initial18c693b1, fixes the previous four findings and adds15semanticregressions. Fresh native independent whole-PR taskses_e84abffd6ffe0ezDAXjyaz6nXereviewed COMPLETE basee2348656-to-fd8fef10 and returned REQUEST_CHANGES with three new counterexamples:Both independent repository gates still passed (1552tests,85explicitnativeprerequisite skips,106subtests; packagecheckPASS). Passing checks are not acceptance of uncovered composed recovery, downgrade or provenance semantics. Prior four findings were not repeated.
These are accepted-scope engineering fixes, not owner architecture/authority decisions. Same bounded sole-writer implementation task is remediating all three with composed crash/reopen, actual old/new reader and unsettled estimate/receipt regressions. No live inference, real-state/profile migration, external repository mutation or security weakening. PR108 remains OPEN/UNMERGED and this issue remains OPEN. Reviewordinals1/2/3 preserved; next fresh whole-PR dispatch must reserve4/10 on the resulting exact HEAD, with no reset or self-review substitute.
Reviews 4–5 And Normal Remediation
The conserved whole-PR counter is now5/10 consumed, including original specification PR94ordinal1. All native reviews inspected complete current base-to-HEAD subjects with fresh contexts; no counter reset or self-approval.
ses_e8470b7d9ffeWnTd3Q9znbPKqa, HEAD20453149/basee2348656: REQUEST_CHANGES, one P2 common reservation validation gap. Negative retained_bytes could manufacture headroom via budgeted_intent. Normal commit4a305927 moves existing strict category/nonnegative-integer guard to the shared path; ten parameterized regressions cover both entrances, invalid types/bytes/category, no outbox/status mutation, replay, over-reservation and reopen.ses_e845c5a8dffe1r5stGvR3i3rtS, HEAD4a305927/basee2348656: REQUEST_CHANGES, one P2 name-only independent_review exemption. Valid explicit check configuration with reviewer_required=False could invoke unbudgeted raw review. Normal commit23a28e31c1requires the actual durable budgeted review path and rejects unsupported explicit configuration at application entry before allocator/runtime/collector/producer effects. Two application regressions cover zero REVIEW capacity, with and without supplied dispatcher; retained durable-review positives pass.Final parent closed/offline
make checkon current tree passed 1577tests,85explicitnative-prerequisite skips,106subtests,431.77s; all locked/static/import/secret/diff gates passed.make package-checkpassed including actual installed base-reader refusal of schema3 and versioned backups/artifacts. Focused review/composed suite33PASS. Same unchanged dependency/tooling audit remains PASS. No native-isolation/live/production success inferred from skips.PR108 remains open/unmerged; issue56open. Current branchissue-56-work-budget-enforcement, basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5, cleanHEAD23a28e31. Next review must reserve ordinal6/10 and freshly inspect COMPLETE PR, not merely the latest fix. These are implementation/remediation receipts, not approval. No external mutation/live spending/realprofilemigration/deploy/main/force/amend.
Whole-PR Reviews 6–7 And Current Recovery Work
Counter 7/10 consumed, including original PR94ordinal1; no reset. PR108 remains OPEN/UNMERGED, this issue OPEN. Current normal HEAD5b8cf8e5a23be0c1f808f6482a996243f1738924, basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5.
Ordinal6 native
ses_e8445dce5ffeOlm126gNX74uzV, HEAD23a28e31: REQUEST_CHANGES for clock evidence rolling back with refused capacity admission and mid-step BudgetRefused escaping the live reference STOP path. Normal commit5b8cf8e5 adds same-DB bounded clock-row pending/acquisition/committed-floor ordering, committed-only cache and lost-sample fail-closed recovery; schema4 with real installed schema2/schema3 downgrade refusal and backups. Mid-step refusal enters durable revocation and original-owned cleanup, including terminal turns.23regressions; complete gates/auditPASS.Ordinal7 native
ses_e83feb8deffeUcgipJYbzr2s3y, COMPLETE5b8cf8e5/basee2348656: REQUEST_CHANGES for two additional recovery boundaries:Those scoped fixes and actual retained-owner/fresh-connection crash regressions are underway in the same bounded sole-writer task. Parent retains all loop orchestration/review counters. This is ordinary engineering remediation, not a new architecture/owner-authority question and not a reason to weaken acceptance.
Latest independent gates1600passed/85explicitnative-prerequisite skips/106subtests and packagecheckPASS, including actual installed old-reader/refusal/backup/artifact tests. These passes do not override material findings or establish live/native isolation. No inference/production state/realprofilemigration/external mutation occurred. Next fresh COMPLETE PR review must reserveordinal8 against the new exact HEAD. Three review invocations remain under the unchanged finite limit; stale approvals/self-review cannot substitute.
Whole-PR Reviews 8–9: Last Bounded Remediation
Conserved counter 9/10 consumed, including original specification PR94ordinal1. PR108 remains OPEN/UNMERGED; issue56OPEN. Current normal HEAD7fa95a422f459ec710452e3099065017240a1f98, basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5. No reset/new delivery cycle inferred from functional scope expansion.
Ordinal8 native
ses_e83baa442ffeInPz376xmh59Nc, HEAD19174b84: REQUEST_CHANGES for the natural runtime-receipt-before-accepted-observation crash. Normal commit7fa95a42 validates exact original receipt/Attempt/input/allocation/identity/current-fence bindings before STOP target selection, reconciles native-return evidence without new work/candidate acceptance, and keeps missing/stale targets explicitly uncertain.40natural/composed regressions do not manually install acceptance first. Full implementation gates1656PASS85nativeprereqskips106subtests/packagecheckPASS.Ordinal9 native
ses_e83506a7effe2OKZGJQ2oVYaXN, COMPLETE7fa95a42/basee2348656: REQUEST_CHANGES with three new P2 findings:Ordinal9 makecheck:1654passed,2failed,85prerequisite skips,106subtests,577.51s. Secret scan after pytest was not reached; independent full-range diffcheck passed. Packagecheck including actual installed older-reader refusal passed. This is change-caused deterministic-coverage failure, not an external capability blocker or reason to waive checks.
Same bounded sole-writer task is fixing all three roots and rerunning COMPLETE gates. Only ordinal10 remains; it must be a fresh complete exact-HEAD independent review, not implementation self-review or a resumed reviewer. No merge/closure without exact current APPROVE, empty material findings and complete gates. If the final finite review cannot approve, existing STOP_REVISE/BLOCKED terminal rules apply to the entire invocation; no hidden reset, extra dispatch, force merge or skipping this delivery. Other backlog work is not claimed complete or QUEUE_EMPTY.
No owner architecture reconfirmation, new security boundary, external mutation, live inference, realprofile operation or deployment is involved.
STOP_REVISE — Finite Whole-PR Budget Exhausted
TERMINAL for the entire
/loopinvocationkernel-loop-20261027T005900Z. Conserved counter10/10 includes original PR94specificationordinal1 and fresh functional whole-PR reviews2–10. No counter reset, extra review, self-review approval, force/auto merge, continued product patching or queue-skipping is authorized in this invocation.Exact Preserved Subject
PR #108 remains OPEN/UNMERGED; issue #56 remains OPEN. Clean ordinary branch
issue-56-work-budget-enforcement, pushed HEADd1d55d406923674c847b98a30756a05e87b52d2c, base/merge-base/current canonical develope2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5. Nine normal implementation/remediation commits retained, no amend/force/history rewrite. Final parent read-only Git/MCP currentness matches these refs. No product edits after the final review result.Final Independent Review
Fresh native task
ses_e82fa5df9ffergwywKo4CjS5Nj, ordinal10/10, COMPLETE exact subject above: REQUEST_CHANGES, one remaining P2 atsrc/creatidy_kernel/ports/intake.py:703–707.approve()records/consumes the owner decision and creates or amends the Program at665–702 BEFORE validating the immutable original work-budget expiry/project/task policies. A changed decision expires_at or incompatible policy can therefore raise BudgetRefused after AmendProgramSpec has already committed. The new Program digest no longer matches the retained binding; previous approval becomes stale although the caller received no ApprovedMeaning. Rejection is not atomic with the approval state it invalidates.Required future remediation: prevalidate original envelope compatibility and preserve original expiry, then make final decision/Program/binding admission incapable of partial invalidation. Regression tests must show refusal preserves prior Program, approval applicability and budget binding for changed expiry and incompatible policy.
New Versus Recurring Evidence
This is a new intake approval counterexample, not an identical earlier finding left unpatched. Earlier specific findings were not repeated in the final whole-PR review, but that is not full correctness or approval. Recurring semantic patterns were validation versus durable transaction boundaries; clock observation versus committed proof; runtime-return/acceptance/settlement distinctions; natural crash cuts versus manually prepared fixtures; and dedupe versus qualified cleanup. The final intake defect repeats the broad atomic-boundary risk in a new call path.
Validation And Limits
Latest implementation complete makecheck:1670passed,85explicitnative-prerequisite skips,106subtests,505.86s, through secret scanning/diffcheck; packagecheckPASS. Final independent reviewer also executed both required gates successfully, including actual installed historical schema2/schema3 readers refusing schema4 and backup/artifact recovery. Relevant unchanged-lock tooling auditPASS. Passing gates do NOT override the material finding or supply exact APPROVE. Native/OCI/realCodex/live/billing/isolation claims remain unproved where skipped; no such upgrade is made.
Disposition
No merge or functional completion receipt for #56. The backlog is NOT QUEUE_EMPTY. The invocation stops rather than silently choosing another issue or resetting counters. Existing STOP_REVISE policy requires a genuinely new explicit owner restart decision before further patches/reviews; this is not a request to reconfirm accepted architecture/backlog or diagnose routine tools.
PhaseA–C remain complete: actual #105/#106, active scopes/priorities and28verified native edges, preserved history/exclusions, independent ALIGNMENT_PASS, delegated ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED in #103comment19309, completion19327 and integrated documentation PR107/e2348656 after architecture PR104/ace7175e.
/loopactually ran selected56 implementation/reviews, but now STOP_REVISE; full product delivery is not claimed. No external repo mutation/live inference/production credentials/realprofile migration/main/release/deployment.Explicit Owner-Authorized Persistence-Boundary Recovery
Direct owner mandate of 2026-10-27T15:34:28Z authorizes ONE materially revised bounded delivery, identity
kernel56-atomic-approval-recovery-20261027T153428Z, not an extension/reset of the stopped delivery. PR #108 remains an immutable STOP_REVISE receipt at HEADd1d55d406923674c847b98a30756a05e87b52d2c, basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5, permanently 10/10 consumed (including original specification PR94 ordinal1). No original review11, unapproved-head merge, rewrite or branch deletion.Confirmed final defect: OrdinaryIntake.approve records decision/consumption and creates/amends Program before immutable budget rejection. New delivery must prove atomic decision/consumption/Program/budget acceptance, prevalidate compatible original envelopes, enforce remaining invariants at the SQLite owner transaction, retain independently durable clock observations and fail-closed semantics, and exercise new/amended/replayed/incompatible/failing/reopened operations. Related split initialization boundaries are included in the audit, not new architecture.
Replacement branch
issue-56-atomic-approval-recoveryretains exact original implementation ancestry. This distinct scope has a maximum four fresh whole-PR independent reviews, starting 0/4, only after comprehensive validation. Reviews must use fresh Sol 6.1 High contexts and full exact-head subjects. Original history remains permanent and separate. Replacement PR/supersession receipt will be linked explicitly; no acceptance claimed.Only after new exact approval, all required gates/currentness and integrated acceptance may existing owner-authorized /loop merge/completion run, followed by fresh canonical SELECT, including independently eligible #59 and #105. No ADR0012 change, external product mutation, live inference, release or deployment.
Replacement PR And Recovery Review 1/4
Replacement PR #109 #109 is open/unmerged, branch
issue-56-atomic-approval-recovery, HEAD76083c7a95abd8b3e801506a1e4f55b164328bab, basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5. Original PR108 is CLOSED/UNMERGED as superseded; original branch/9commits/native history remain intact at permanent10/10. New delivery identity/provenance is #19377, not an original counter extension.New atomic owner acceptance commits configured decision/consumption/Program/binding/artifact references together or none; original clock evidence commits separately, original projections persist, configured envelopes cannot be removed through legacy paths. Related task/offline/live-reference initialization shares this primitive.24newregressions and final primary makecheck1694PASS85existingnativeprerequisite skips106subtests/packagecheckPASS; budget-removal bypass reproduced failing before guard.
Fresh whole-PR requested GPT-6.1 Sol High, task
ses_e81d3addaffeuriOHGR0VP3Lqb, recovery ordinal1/4, independently verified entire41-file current delta, initial/final canonical/local refs and clean checkout; independent makecheck1694PASS85same skips106subtests/packagecheckPASS. Verdict REQUEST_CHANGES, one NEW P1: unresolved verification-command recovery and WorkUncertain return before supported STOP/expiry cleanup of an independently identifiable still-owned runtime group. No-publication/refused workspace reuse is correct, but does not discharge bounded cancellation. Earlier atomic-approval defect not repeated; no general approval inferred.In-scope #56AC3 remediation is underway with natural crash/STOP/boot-expiry regressions: preserve command unknown/no reset/reexecution, yet run existing exact receipt/fence/original-owned runtime retirement. No numericPID adoption/new cleanup architecture. Three recovery reviews remain, next must be fresh complete exact-head review after normal commit and full gates. No merge/closure/live effects/external mutation or gate weakening.
Integrated Acceptance And Completion
Owner-authorized recovery
kernel56-atomic-approval-recovery-20261027T153428Zcompleted through replacement PR109 #109, merged at2026-10-27T18:41:35Z asb11aae420517b14bbb4d85c84f9a0d82c14446c6. Approved HEADecfee7d04fae5149ba4538d706ebb303662a6458, approved basee2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5. Canonical PR readback/fetch verifies actual merge, exact two parents, approved HEAD ancestor of develop and integrated tree identical to approved/tested tree. No direct develop push/force/auto/squash/deletion.Active AC1-6 Verified On Integrated Content
Final primary closed/offline
make check: 1738passed,85existingoptionalnative skips,106subtests,585.17s, all locked/static/types/inward-import/secrets/diff gatesPASS; packagecheckPASS; auditNO KNOWN VULNERABILITIES. Fresh independent whole-PR GPT-6.1 Sol High recovery3/4 (ses_e816f34d1ffe0krOQLsBWMg7bs) APPROVE/findings[] on exact approved refs, own check1738PASS/85skip/106subtests562.62s/packagePASS. ExactHEAD CI3281/UI243SUCCESS. Red-first counterexamples retained; no gate weakened.Immutable History
Original PR108 CLOSED/UNMERGED/STOP_REVISE, permanently10/10 (including original PR94 specificationordinal1), original branch
issue-56-work-budget-enforcementatd1d55d406923674c847b98a30756a05e87b52d2c and all nine implementation/remediation commits/native review results preserved. New four normal commits76083c7a,201c8f5f,81631a27,ecfee7d0 retain that full ancestry. Separate authorized recovery 3/4: REQUEST_CHANGES, REQUEST_CHANGES, APPROVE. One unused slot; no original11 or recovery4. PR109receipt19415 preserves exact review/merge provenance.85 skipped native opt-ins are NOT live inference/provider-billing/strict syscall expiry/hostile isolation/product GO. No ADR0012/architecture replanning, SR/MI/CC mutation, production profiles/credentials, main/release/deploy. Scoped msgpack dev-lock patch repairs observed audit CVE without new product dependency. Full acceptance is the active synthetic/self-contained scope, not superseded historical live requirements.
Closing56 only after this verified integrated acceptance. Next: safely return same checkout to canonical develop and rebuild FULL fresh canonical SELECT, explicitly assessing #59 and #105 independently rather than treating former56 restrictions as repository-wide.
kilo referenced this issue2026-10-30 17:51:49 +00:00