Creatidy/creatidy-kernel
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 9 Pull requests 2 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Revise unified work coordination architecture and realign the canonical backlog #103

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-26 22:49:25 +00:00 by kilo · 5 comments
kilo commented 2026-10-26 22:49:25 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Active Architecture Publication And Consistency Mandate

Priority: P1

Type: architecture/backlog maintenance. This active section supersedes conflicting historical scope, priority and preparation-time authority text below; the entire original body and all comments remain evidence.

Goal

Publish and objectively verify the canonical backlog implementing the accepted unified work-coordination architecture integrated by PR #104 at ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4, then record evidence-conditioned delegated consistency acceptance.

Why

Integrated architecture and narrow historical deliveries must be distinguished from actual functional publication and full acceptance. An integrated documentation PR alone does not prove the canonical backlog was published.

Scope

Execute the complete issue payloads, comparable priorities and native dependency plan in integrated docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.md; freshly deduplicate/register its two functional issues, update #52/#55/#56/#57/#58/#59/#60/#62, preserve original bodies/comments/PRs/counters and unchanged excluded #15/#30/#37/#44. Verify all published records and the accepted predecessor evidence. Independently audit actual postpublication architecture/code/issues/dependencies and current SR/MI/CC producer contracts, read-only externally. Maintain the CK-local impact report and publish exact receipts here.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Verify PR #104 merged, exact merge/head ancestry and current canonical develop. ADR 0012 is integrated authority; preparation-time pending-integration wording is historical, not evidence that PR #104 remains open.
  2. Every nonexcluded current issue has complete active functional scope and acceptance, one comparable Priority: Pn field, actual issue links and preserved Historical Scope And Evidence. Create no duplicate or revived rejected issue; aliases are not API IDs.
  3. Publish and canonically read back every planned native edge in both directions; verify bounded acceptance of closed predecessors and acyclicity. No #59 -> #57, ordinary-engine -> #57/#52/#55, component -> #60 or mandatory SR/MI/Console basic-work gate.
  4. Record exact postpublication revisions, exclusion/history checks and independent fresh-context ALIGNMENT_PASS or ALIGNMENT_FAIL with evidence. Correct scoped material findings and obtain a fresh complete review before acceptance.
  5. The CK-local SR/MI/CC impact report identifies current revisions/contracts/issues, owners, priorities, required/optional/unverified changes and precise gating stage without external mutation or unsupported live claims.
  6. Only after integrated #104, verified complete publication, fresh independent PASS with no unresolved material findings and no newer conflicting owner decision, record ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED here as delegated objective consistency acceptance, not a claim the owner personally reviewed or that full product/live acceptance passed.
  7. Preserve the existing canonical CLOSED disposition observed at 2026-10-27T00:21:03Z; closure itself is not completion evidence. Add verified completion evidence without reopening or erasing history. Under the owner's explicit 2026-10-27 instruction, successful consistency acceptance is followed by fresh SELECT and normal repository /loop in the primary context, without another owner confirmation.

Constraints

ADR 0012 and ADR 0011; dependencies inward; public self-contained core. This publication task changes no product code and adopts no coding agent, tracker, catalogue, gateway or generic workflow DSL. No credential/runtime-state copying, external repository mutation, paid/live inference, production operation, real key/profile migration, release/deployment/main or safety bypass. Preserve old bytes/IDs/unknowns, #53 CLOSED/NOT IMPLEMENTED and PR #85 CLOSED/UNMERGED. PR #100 remains negative compatibility evidence, #101 bounded provenance and #102 bounded synthetic platform/ciphertext evidence. Preserve all review ordinals and counters. Synthetic offline and installed evidence never means live acceptance. The explicit owner mandate delegates consistency acceptance and later /loop; it does not redesign the architecture or grant broader external effects. Functional implementation has no predecessor edge to this maintenance issue.

Priority taxonomy: P0 evidenced urgent safety/data-integrity emergency (none assigned); P1 core functionality/authority/data-integrity foundation; P2 required integration/compatibility/operability/downstream acceptance; P3 optional independent capability. Historical descriptive priority is retained but superseded by the active field; existing /loop selection is unchanged.

Links

  • Owner mandate: explicit architecture publication, delegated consistency acceptance and /loop continuation instruction, 2026-10-27T00:24:56Z.
  • Integrated PR: #104
  • ADR 0012: ace7175e08/docs/adr/0012-unified-work-coordination-and-drivers.md
  • Publication payloads/dependency/impact plan: ace7175e08/docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.md
  • Current target and migration: docs/architecture/target.md, docs/architecture/migration.md at that integrated revision; ADR 0011 remains binding.
  • Publication, independent review and acceptance receipts will be recorded in comments with actual newly assigned functional issue IDs.

Historical Scope And Evidence

The complete prepublication body follows unchanged. Preparation-time authority statements reflect the earlier mandate; the direct 2026-10-27 owner instruction supplies the additional publication/acceptance/continuation authority above.

Goal

Record the owner-authorized 2026-10-26 architecture revision of Creatidy Kernel as a vendor-independent work-control and resource-coordination layer, and reconcile the complete canonical CK backlog against it.

Why

Current bounded implementations and historical owned-session/gateway assumptions must not become competing product architectures or circular backlog prerequisites. The owner primarily uses Kilo; CK must complement existing harnesses without duplicating their model/tool loop, trackers, SCM/CI, Router or MI.

Scope

Documentation/ADR and CK backlog maintenance only. Define one durable core with complementary pull/push interaction modes, capability-based clients/adapters, separated Work Management/SCM/CI/Knowledge/Harness/Resource drivers, shared owner-served commands/status/events, work-level resource policy and a full-product migration. Inspect all open CK issues, relevant closed evidence, integrated PRs #100/#101/#102, native dependency edges and current SR/MI/CC contracts read-only. Prepare evidence-backed scope, acceptance, dependency and comparable-priority updates for every relevant open issue, deduplicating genuinely missing functional work.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. New numbered ADR and current architecture establish one precise target: identity, claims/fencing/expiry, authority, review/acceptance, durable effects, unknown/recovery and honest STOP semantics across pull/push.
  2. Driver ownership, provider-qualified nonnumeric identity, capabilities/versions, freshness/pagination/native semantics, mutations/receipts/reconciliation, compatibility/refusal and Forgejo migration are explicit.
  3. Preserve ADR 0011, #53 closed/not implemented, #52 Kilo multipart and fail-open-plugin evidence; basic work coordination is independent of enforced Router gateway compatibility without weakening strict route/pin/admission profiles.
  4. Complete canonical backlog review includes every open issue and its comments/dependencies, integrated versus remaining evidence, complete functional acceptance, justified comparable priority and executable ordering without circular prerequisites.
  5. SR/MI/CC impact matrix names exact inspected revisions/contracts/issues, ownership, required versus optional changes and named unverified checks. No cross-repository mutations.
  6. Required repository validation and fresh independent whole-PR architectural review are recorded with exact base/head and preserved finite review ordinals.
  7. Architecture integration and canonical backlog publication are sequenced honestly: an unmerged ADR is a reviewed proposal, not integrated authority. If standalone merge authority is unavailable, preserve the reviewed PR and complete prepared issue-update plan and report the exact owner merge action. Resume no feature implementation.

Constraints

Explicit owner documentation/planning mandate, not /loop or feature implementation. No product source changes, additional PoC, new mandatory harness/dependency/proxy, live inference/paid calls, production operation, cross-project mutation, main/release/deploy or standalone merge. Documentation and issue text in English; final owner report in Polish. Existing independent-review and safety rules remain unchanged. Architecture/backlog acceptance precedes ordinary development resumption.

Links

  • Owner mandate: current 2026-10-26 architecture/backlog revision request.
  • ADR 0007 and ADR 0011 in canonical CK documentation.
  • Existing open scope: #52, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #62; historical wontfix issues remain unchanged.
  • Observation base: develop 26c7eb15a71affc11aba760387e2dae806053d4b (clean ordinary checkout, canonical Git fetch and MCP repository access verified).
## Active Architecture Publication And Consistency Mandate Priority: P1 Type: architecture/backlog maintenance. This active section supersedes conflicting historical scope, priority and preparation-time authority text below; the entire original body and all comments remain evidence. ## Goal Publish and objectively verify the canonical backlog implementing the accepted unified work-coordination architecture integrated by PR #104 at `ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4`, then record evidence-conditioned delegated consistency acceptance. ## Why Integrated architecture and narrow historical deliveries must be distinguished from actual functional publication and full acceptance. An integrated documentation PR alone does not prove the canonical backlog was published. ## Scope Execute the complete issue payloads, comparable priorities and native dependency plan in integrated `docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.md`; freshly deduplicate/register its two functional issues, update #52/#55/#56/#57/#58/#59/#60/#62, preserve original bodies/comments/PRs/counters and unchanged excluded #15/#30/#37/#44. Verify all published records and the accepted predecessor evidence. Independently audit actual postpublication architecture/code/issues/dependencies and current SR/MI/CC producer contracts, read-only externally. Maintain the CK-local impact report and publish exact receipts here. ## Acceptance Criteria 1. Verify PR #104 merged, exact merge/head ancestry and current canonical develop. ADR 0012 is integrated authority; preparation-time pending-integration wording is historical, not evidence that PR #104 remains open. 2. Every nonexcluded current issue has complete active functional scope and acceptance, one comparable `Priority: Pn` field, actual issue links and preserved Historical Scope And Evidence. Create no duplicate or revived rejected issue; aliases are not API IDs. 3. Publish and canonically read back every planned native edge in both directions; verify bounded acceptance of closed predecessors and acyclicity. No #59 -> #57, ordinary-engine -> #57/#52/#55, component -> #60 or mandatory SR/MI/Console basic-work gate. 4. Record exact postpublication revisions, exclusion/history checks and independent fresh-context ALIGNMENT_PASS or ALIGNMENT_FAIL with evidence. Correct scoped material findings and obtain a fresh complete review before acceptance. 5. The CK-local SR/MI/CC impact report identifies current revisions/contracts/issues, owners, priorities, required/optional/unverified changes and precise gating stage without external mutation or unsupported live claims. 6. Only after integrated #104, verified complete publication, fresh independent PASS with no unresolved material findings and no newer conflicting owner decision, record `ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED` here as delegated objective consistency acceptance, not a claim the owner personally reviewed or that full product/live acceptance passed. 7. Preserve the existing canonical CLOSED disposition observed at 2026-10-27T00:21:03Z; closure itself is not completion evidence. Add verified completion evidence without reopening or erasing history. Under the owner's explicit 2026-10-27 instruction, successful consistency acceptance is followed by fresh SELECT and normal repository /loop in the primary context, without another owner confirmation. ## Constraints ADR 0012 and ADR 0011; dependencies inward; public self-contained core. This publication task changes no product code and adopts no coding agent, tracker, catalogue, gateway or generic workflow DSL. No credential/runtime-state copying, external repository mutation, paid/live inference, production operation, real key/profile migration, release/deployment/main or safety bypass. Preserve old bytes/IDs/unknowns, #53 CLOSED/NOT IMPLEMENTED and PR #85 CLOSED/UNMERGED. PR #100 remains negative compatibility evidence, #101 bounded provenance and #102 bounded synthetic platform/ciphertext evidence. Preserve all review ordinals and counters. Synthetic offline and installed evidence never means live acceptance. The explicit owner mandate delegates consistency acceptance and later /loop; it does not redesign the architecture or grant broader external effects. Functional implementation has no predecessor edge to this maintenance issue. Priority taxonomy: P0 evidenced urgent safety/data-integrity emergency (none assigned); P1 core functionality/authority/data-integrity foundation; P2 required integration/compatibility/operability/downstream acceptance; P3 optional independent capability. Historical descriptive priority is retained but superseded by the active field; existing /loop selection is unchanged. ## Links - Owner mandate: explicit architecture publication, delegated consistency acceptance and /loop continuation instruction, 2026-10-27T00:24:56Z. - Integrated PR: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/pulls/104 - ADR 0012: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/src/commit/ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4/docs/adr/0012-unified-work-coordination-and-drivers.md - Publication payloads/dependency/impact plan: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/src/commit/ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4/docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.md - Current target and migration: `docs/architecture/target.md`, `docs/architecture/migration.md` at that integrated revision; ADR 0011 remains binding. - Publication, independent review and acceptance receipts will be recorded in comments with actual newly assigned functional issue IDs. ## Historical Scope And Evidence The complete prepublication body follows unchanged. Preparation-time authority statements reflect the earlier mandate; the direct 2026-10-27 owner instruction supplies the additional publication/acceptance/continuation authority above. ## Goal Record the owner-authorized 2026-10-26 architecture revision of Creatidy Kernel as a vendor-independent work-control and resource-coordination layer, and reconcile the complete canonical CK backlog against it. ## Why Current bounded implementations and historical owned-session/gateway assumptions must not become competing product architectures or circular backlog prerequisites. The owner primarily uses Kilo; CK must complement existing harnesses without duplicating their model/tool loop, trackers, SCM/CI, Router or MI. ## Scope Documentation/ADR and CK backlog maintenance only. Define one durable core with complementary pull/push interaction modes, capability-based clients/adapters, separated Work Management/SCM/CI/Knowledge/Harness/Resource drivers, shared owner-served commands/status/events, work-level resource policy and a full-product migration. Inspect all open CK issues, relevant closed evidence, integrated PRs #100/#101/#102, native dependency edges and current SR/MI/CC contracts read-only. Prepare evidence-backed scope, acceptance, dependency and comparable-priority updates for every relevant open issue, deduplicating genuinely missing functional work. ## Acceptance Criteria 1. New numbered ADR and current architecture establish one precise target: identity, claims/fencing/expiry, authority, review/acceptance, durable effects, unknown/recovery and honest STOP semantics across pull/push. 2. Driver ownership, provider-qualified nonnumeric identity, capabilities/versions, freshness/pagination/native semantics, mutations/receipts/reconciliation, compatibility/refusal and Forgejo migration are explicit. 3. Preserve ADR 0011, #53 closed/not implemented, #52 Kilo multipart and fail-open-plugin evidence; basic work coordination is independent of enforced Router gateway compatibility without weakening strict route/pin/admission profiles. 4. Complete canonical backlog review includes every open issue and its comments/dependencies, integrated versus remaining evidence, complete functional acceptance, justified comparable priority and executable ordering without circular prerequisites. 5. SR/MI/CC impact matrix names exact inspected revisions/contracts/issues, ownership, required versus optional changes and named unverified checks. No cross-repository mutations. 6. Required repository validation and fresh independent whole-PR architectural review are recorded with exact base/head and preserved finite review ordinals. 7. Architecture integration and canonical backlog publication are sequenced honestly: an unmerged ADR is a reviewed proposal, not integrated authority. If standalone merge authority is unavailable, preserve the reviewed PR and complete prepared issue-update plan and report the exact owner merge action. Resume no feature implementation. ## Constraints Explicit owner documentation/planning mandate, not /loop or feature implementation. No product source changes, additional PoC, new mandatory harness/dependency/proxy, live inference/paid calls, production operation, cross-project mutation, main/release/deploy or standalone merge. Documentation and issue text in English; final owner report in Polish. Existing independent-review and safety rules remain unchanged. Architecture/backlog acceptance precedes ordinary development resumption. ## Links - Owner mandate: current 2026-10-26 architecture/backlog revision request. - ADR 0007 and ADR 0011 in canonical CK documentation. - Existing open scope: #52, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #62; historical wontfix issues remain unchanged. - Observation base: develop `26c7eb15a71affc11aba760387e2dae806053d4b` (clean ordinary checkout, canonical Git fetch and MCP repository access verified).
kilo commented 2026-10-26 23:32:24 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Architecture Delivery: READY_TO_MERGE, Publication Still Pending

PR #104: #104

Base/merge-base 26c7eb15a71affc11aba760387e2dae806053d4b; exact reviewed HEAD c0d5a65ffee7411e359b66c9a980887cdb5102d7; branch issue-103-unified-work-architecture. Sixteen documentation files, no product source or dependency change. Canonical branch pushed; checkout clean/synchronized.

Fresh independent native whole-PR architectural review, ordinal 1/10, task ses_e857f149affefr8CbcYO7TaPVa: APPROVE, findings [], exact current HEAD/base. Complete target/backlog/impact/current-source review and pinned public producer verification; no owner transfer of prompts/results. Independent and primary make check PASS (1516 passed, 85 optional-native skipped, 106 subtests), make package-check PASS; repository/docs-link tests 4 passed. Exact-head CI internal #3253 / UI #227 succeeded: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/actions/runs/227. Specialized native/live proofs not rerun or claimed.

Prepared deliverables: ADR 0012, one unified pull/push target, six independent driver responsibilities, claim/authority/STOP/uncertainty/resource semantics, migration preserving accepted work, and docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.md with every open issue disposition, complete active body/AC/priority payloads, explicit acyclic native-edge plan, two deduplicated missing functional successors (A/B, unregistered), implementation sequence and SR/MI/CC impact matrix. Complete backlog paging, all open comments/native edges, relevant closed evidence and integrated #100/#101/#102 were inspected; final refresh remains 13 open issues, next page empty, unchanged exact wontfix exclusions #15/#30/#37/#44. No QUEUE_EMPTY or feature-selection claim.

Actual canonical mutations: registered this mandate issue and published this delivery comment; created/updated PR #104. Architecture-dependent functional issue bodies, priorities and dependency edges have NOT been changed. A/B have NOT been registered. No issue was closed/reopened, no SR/MI/CC mutation, inference, release or deployment.

Required owner integration action: merge exact reviewed/current PR #104 to develop through existing protections/currentness gates. Standalone merge authority is unavailable, so no merge or /loop workaround was attempted. Then resume this architecture/backlog maintenance mandate for fresh dedup/currentness, actual issue/priority/native-edge publication and read-back/acceptance using the complete prepared plan. Do not resume ordinary feature implementation before that alignment is consistently published and accepted. This issue stays OPEN; reviewed documentation alone does not complete the full mandate.

Limit: original shared architecture v1.0 bytes were not accessible in authorized public sources; recorded decisions and current owner direction were used without inventing unseen content.

## Architecture Delivery: READY_TO_MERGE, Publication Still Pending PR #104: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/pulls/104 Base/merge-base `26c7eb15a71affc11aba760387e2dae806053d4b`; exact reviewed HEAD `c0d5a65ffee7411e359b66c9a980887cdb5102d7`; branch `issue-103-unified-work-architecture`. Sixteen documentation files, no product source or dependency change. Canonical branch pushed; checkout clean/synchronized. Fresh independent native whole-PR architectural review, ordinal **1/10**, task `ses_e857f149affefr8CbcYO7TaPVa`: **APPROVE**, findings `[]`, exact current HEAD/base. Complete target/backlog/impact/current-source review and pinned public producer verification; no owner transfer of prompts/results. Independent and primary `make check` PASS (1516 passed, 85 optional-native skipped, 106 subtests), `make package-check` PASS; repository/docs-link tests 4 passed. Exact-head CI internal #3253 / UI #227 succeeded: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/actions/runs/227. Specialized native/live proofs not rerun or claimed. Prepared deliverables: ADR 0012, one unified pull/push target, six independent driver responsibilities, claim/authority/STOP/uncertainty/resource semantics, migration preserving accepted work, and `docs/architecture/backlog-alignment.md` with every open issue disposition, complete active body/AC/priority payloads, explicit acyclic native-edge plan, two deduplicated missing functional successors (A/B, unregistered), implementation sequence and SR/MI/CC impact matrix. Complete backlog paging, all open comments/native edges, relevant closed evidence and integrated #100/#101/#102 were inspected; final refresh remains 13 open issues, next page empty, unchanged exact wontfix exclusions #15/#30/#37/#44. No QUEUE_EMPTY or feature-selection claim. **Actual canonical mutations:** registered this mandate issue and published this delivery comment; created/updated PR #104. Architecture-dependent functional issue bodies, priorities and dependency edges have NOT been changed. A/B have NOT been registered. No issue was closed/reopened, no SR/MI/CC mutation, inference, release or deployment. **Required owner integration action:** merge exact reviewed/current PR #104 to develop through existing protections/currentness gates. Standalone merge authority is unavailable, so no merge or /loop workaround was attempted. Then resume this architecture/backlog maintenance mandate for fresh dedup/currentness, actual issue/priority/native-edge publication and read-back/acceptance using the complete prepared plan. Do not resume ordinary feature implementation before that alignment is consistently published and accepted. This issue stays OPEN; reviewed documentation alone does not complete the full mandate. Limit: original shared architecture v1.0 bytes were not accessible in authorized public sources; recorded decisions and current owner direction were used without inventing unseen content.
kilo commented 2026-10-27 00:33:55 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Canonical Publication And Cross-Project Impact Receipt, 2026-10-27

Direct owner mandate at 00:24:56Z delegates publication, fresh independent consistency review, objective acceptance on the already approved criteria, and subsequent normal /loop. This comment records facts, not final acceptance. PR #104 is MERGED by adrian.tkacz at ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4; approved head c0d5a65ffee7411e359b66c9a980887cdb5102d7 is an ancestor of fetched canonical develop, which currently equals that merge. #103 had already been closed at 00:21:03Z; that disposition is preserved, not treated as publication proof.

Actual Functional Registrations

  • #105: independent Work Management/SCM/CI/Knowledge drivers, functional Forgejo and Jira/GitHub/Jenkins/Confluence installed composition, P1; prepared alias A.
  • #106: ordinary approved Program execution through one shared pull/managed-push application lifecycle, P1; prepared alias B.
  • Fresh complete prepublication issue inventory was 12 actual issues, pages 5+5+2+empty, all 33 comments, seven labels plus empty, no priority labels/native edges. All-state exact-title searches and relevant closed-scope comparisons found no equivalent A/B delivery. Existing #15/#30/#37/#44 remain exact wontfix exclusions, untouched and unranked. #53 and PR #85 remain CLOSED/NOT IMPLEMENTED and CLOSED/UNMERGED.

Native Dependency Publication

All 28 writes succeeded through supported native MCP. A separate read-only verification completed at 00:31:38Z: both directions across all 23 affected/predecessor/excluded issues were paged through explicit empty terminal pages. Exactly 28 expected edges, exact inverses, no missing/unexpected edges or cycles; all eight closed predecessors have no further native dependencies.

Issue Required Native Predecessors
#105 none
#59 #48, #50, #61, #90
#56 #48, #49, #54
#106 #105, #59, #56, #49, #54
#57 #59, #106
#52 #47, #51
#55 #105
#58 #56, #106, #54
#62 none
#60 #105, #106, #52, #56, #57, #58, #59, #62
#103 none

No #59 -> #57, #106 -> #57/#52/#55, component -> #60 or external native dependency was installed. Actual accepted predecessor merges/receipts were verified, not inferred from closure: #47/PR66 5048c5c comment14822 (bounded research only); #48/PR69 cb4afda comment15442 (owned-session/envelope, not boot-clock or universal settlement); #49/PR73 a9a6500 comment15506 (inert preparation); #50/PR74 1deb329 comment15570 (verification/test-child boundary only); #51/PR76 56a95aa comment15673 (recommendation only); #54/PR92 40eea02 comment17600 (durable synthetic-first review/remediation); #61/PR75 71c1327 comment15652 (qualified source ownership, not work claims); #90/PR93 a7da7c7 comment17647 (bounded cancellation settlement, not normal completion/escaped descendants). Each merge is an ancestor of current develop and has the reviewed-head tree. All historical counters remain preserved.

CK-Local Refreshed Impact Report

Read-only canonical refs matched clean local public source: SR 4a182affa4775a4a38b47860ad7622a099c56c4a; MI 8f572c332db8290b5dad9e03f5b0f960271a8349; CC 417372f189874a01dc0cd0ea9d494f18f4c180a4. No external repository was mutated; no live provider/collector/model call or secret/runtime state was read.

Project / Exact Contract And Existing Issue Impact / External Change Actually Needed CK Consumer / Gate Stage Priority / Responsible Owner / Status
SR work versus model capacity: routing_core.py, execution_assurance.py No SR change required for independent work decisions, claims or work budgets #105/#106/#56/#59 implementation independent P1 CK, CK owner; no external prerequisite
SR #174 D-079 /v1/route, executable_contract.py; #179 identity/effort; #181 D-080 Responses Bounded producers accepted; CK must receive actual route/pin/tool/helper/recovery semantics, not invent API #52 strict integration and #60 strict acceptance only P2 CK; SR producer/CK consumer; bounded satisfied, full reception unverified
Exact Kilo 7.8.18 multipart: gateway_openai.py content arrays, gateway_responses.py multiple parts; CK PR #100 Current refusals unchanged after SR #223. Conditional separately accepted SR extension OR independently proved lossless supported CK adapter; no exact extension issue verified among named contracts #52/#60 exact combination only, not basic work P2 conditional; SR if semantics change, CK if adapter; NOT_ESTABLISHED retained
SR #184 execution_assurance.py schema-1 source_call_facts, trusted callback gateway_coordinator.py; docs/architecture.md Local producer exists, explicitly not a public endpoint. Eventual remote CK receipt/correction seam UNVERIFIED; no producer change yet established #56/#58 strict metering integration/acceptance; no basic budget gate P1 CK policy/P2 metering, CK; SR only if concrete missing seam proved
SR #180 inference_only, #199 open legacy D-063 retirement Preserve native editing lane until replacement/equivalence plus explicit migration; no immediate external change for basic CK Affected #52/#60 lane retirement, not #106 prerequisite SR #199 owner, existing gated scope; no new rank
MI #13 publication, #19/PR42; SR #176/PR221; PUBLICATION_CONTRACT.md, mi.utilization-working/1 Existing reference/provenance path satisfied; no MI redesign/service required Delivered #55 reference retained; optional direct context through #105 P3 optional CK #55; MI/SR producer owners, CK consumer
SR #222 CLOSED / PR #223 MERGED, D-082 mi_consumer.py, selection_app.py, routing_core.py, docs/machine-interfaces.md Drift from prior audit: default-off opt-in MI selection/admission policy is now integrated, NOT still unaccepted. Complete real-source channel/configuration/effort/applicability/freshness positive adoption remains unestablished Optional #55/selected #52 source-adoption acceptance, never #105/#106 implementation gate MI curator + SR policy owner; optional, no external priority mutation
MI #17 OPERATIONAL_SHARING_REVIEW.md; SR #177 open local outcome consumer Current MI operational intake remains REJECTED. No CK upload/MI receiver or external redesign needed; SR local consumption optional #58 private export implementation, optional downstream integration P2 CK export; CK/SR respective owners; sharing requires separate authority
MI #16 OPERATOR_CONTRACT.md, SR #183 open MI already supplies offline full snapshots, commands=[], replay=false. SR owns its observer auth/state/events; no mandatory MI live endpoint #57 CK producer independent; CC downstream views P1 CK; MI bounded satisfied, SR open; no CK prerequisite
CC #2 CLOSED gap inventory, #3/#4/#6/#7/#12 OPEN; docs/contracts.md, src/App.tsx no-connections scaffold Actual CC client/views/commands still needed downstream; CK first supplies scoped owner/worker/observer contract, no shared scheduler/permission DB/SQL reader #57 producer, CC integration/acceptance; no CC gate on CK basic implementation CK #57 P1; existing CC #3/#7/#12 P1, #4/#6 P2; respective owners unchanged
SR #185 CLOSED/#186 OPEN, MI #18 CLOSED, installed/installation and machine-interface contracts Per-version bounded compatibility exists; receive each affected supported cell. No global SR release/platform gate on CK installation #62 implementation/integration alongside other work, #60 downstream acceptance P2 CK, respective package owners; remaining host/platform cells unverified

The MI19 installed receipt stays frozen to MI producer d65891668b7e79f7b666c021f02a1b4bf8c4ca9c and SR consumer 4162f6fa9f774beaf6e92d86b7ebc92f306da4bd; newer SR opt-in policy does not upgrade it into real-source adoption, live acceptance, billing or physical identity. PR #101 remains bounded provenance; PR #102 remains synthetic storage/ciphertext evidence. Documentation-status/impact corrections are being prepared on ordinary branch issue-103-publish-architecture-backlog, with no product-code changes; they are not canonical until reviewed/integrated. Final independent consistency review and delegated acceptance are still pending.

## Canonical Publication And Cross-Project Impact Receipt, 2026-10-27 Direct owner mandate at 00:24:56Z delegates publication, fresh independent consistency review, objective acceptance on the already approved criteria, and subsequent normal /loop. This comment records facts, not final acceptance. PR #104 is MERGED by adrian.tkacz at `ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4`; approved head `c0d5a65ffee7411e359b66c9a980887cdb5102d7` is an ancestor of fetched canonical develop, which currently equals that merge. #103 had already been closed at 00:21:03Z; that disposition is preserved, not treated as publication proof. ### Actual Functional Registrations - #105: independent Work Management/SCM/CI/Knowledge drivers, functional Forgejo and Jira/GitHub/Jenkins/Confluence installed composition, P1; prepared alias A. - #106: ordinary approved Program execution through one shared pull/managed-push application lifecycle, P1; prepared alias B. - Fresh complete prepublication issue inventory was 12 actual issues, pages 5+5+2+empty, all 33 comments, seven labels plus empty, no priority labels/native edges. All-state exact-title searches and relevant closed-scope comparisons found no equivalent A/B delivery. Existing #15/#30/#37/#44 remain exact wontfix exclusions, untouched and unranked. #53 and PR #85 remain CLOSED/NOT IMPLEMENTED and CLOSED/UNMERGED. ### Native Dependency Publication All 28 writes succeeded through supported native MCP. A separate read-only verification completed at 00:31:38Z: both directions across all 23 affected/predecessor/excluded issues were paged through explicit empty terminal pages. Exactly 28 expected edges, exact inverses, no missing/unexpected edges or cycles; all eight closed predecessors have no further native dependencies. | Issue | Required Native Predecessors | |---|---| | #105 | none | | #59 | #48, #50, #61, #90 | | #56 | #48, #49, #54 | | #106 | #105, #59, #56, #49, #54 | | #57 | #59, #106 | | #52 | #47, #51 | | #55 | #105 | | #58 | #56, #106, #54 | | #62 | none | | #60 | #105, #106, #52, #56, #57, #58, #59, #62 | | #103 | none | No #59 -> #57, #106 -> #57/#52/#55, component -> #60 or external native dependency was installed. Actual accepted predecessor merges/receipts were verified, not inferred from closure: #47/PR66 `5048c5c` comment14822 (bounded research only); #48/PR69 `cb4afda` comment15442 (owned-session/envelope, not boot-clock or universal settlement); #49/PR73 `a9a6500` comment15506 (inert preparation); #50/PR74 `1deb329` comment15570 (verification/test-child boundary only); #51/PR76 `56a95aa` comment15673 (recommendation only); #54/PR92 `40eea02` comment17600 (durable synthetic-first review/remediation); #61/PR75 `71c1327` comment15652 (qualified source ownership, not work claims); #90/PR93 `a7da7c7` comment17647 (bounded cancellation settlement, not normal completion/escaped descendants). Each merge is an ancestor of current develop and has the reviewed-head tree. All historical counters remain preserved. ### CK-Local Refreshed Impact Report Read-only canonical refs matched clean local public source: SR `4a182affa4775a4a38b47860ad7622a099c56c4a`; MI `8f572c332db8290b5dad9e03f5b0f960271a8349`; CC `417372f189874a01dc0cd0ea9d494f18f4c180a4`. No external repository was mutated; no live provider/collector/model call or secret/runtime state was read. | Project / Exact Contract And Existing Issue | Impact / External Change Actually Needed | CK Consumer / Gate Stage | Priority / Responsible Owner / Status | |---|---|---|---| | SR work versus model capacity: `routing_core.py`, `execution_assurance.py` | No SR change required for independent work decisions, claims or work budgets | #105/#106/#56/#59 implementation independent | P1 CK, CK owner; no external prerequisite | | SR #174 D-079 `/v1/route`, `executable_contract.py`; #179 identity/effort; #181 D-080 Responses | Bounded producers accepted; CK must receive actual route/pin/tool/helper/recovery semantics, not invent API | #52 strict integration and #60 strict acceptance only | P2 CK; SR producer/CK consumer; bounded satisfied, full reception unverified | | Exact Kilo 7.8.18 multipart: `gateway_openai.py` content arrays, `gateway_responses.py` multiple parts; CK PR #100 | Current refusals unchanged after SR #223. Conditional separately accepted SR extension OR independently proved lossless supported CK adapter; no exact extension issue verified among named contracts | #52/#60 exact combination only, not basic work | P2 conditional; SR if semantics change, CK if adapter; NOT_ESTABLISHED retained | | SR #184 `execution_assurance.py` schema-1 `source_call_facts`, trusted callback `gateway_coordinator.py`; `docs/architecture.md` | Local producer exists, explicitly not a public endpoint. Eventual remote CK receipt/correction seam UNVERIFIED; no producer change yet established | #56/#58 strict metering integration/acceptance; no basic budget gate | P1 CK policy/P2 metering, CK; SR only if concrete missing seam proved | | SR #180 `inference_only`, #199 open legacy D-063 retirement | Preserve native editing lane until replacement/equivalence plus explicit migration; no immediate external change for basic CK | Affected #52/#60 lane retirement, not #106 prerequisite | SR #199 owner, existing gated scope; no new rank | | MI #13 publication, #19/PR42; SR #176/PR221; `PUBLICATION_CONTRACT.md`, `mi.utilization-working/1` | Existing reference/provenance path satisfied; no MI redesign/service required | Delivered #55 reference retained; optional direct context through #105 | P3 optional CK #55; MI/SR producer owners, CK consumer | | SR #222 CLOSED / PR #223 MERGED, D-082 `mi_consumer.py`, `selection_app.py`, `routing_core.py`, `docs/machine-interfaces.md` | Drift from prior audit: default-off opt-in MI selection/admission policy is now integrated, NOT still unaccepted. Complete real-source channel/configuration/effort/applicability/freshness positive adoption remains unestablished | Optional #55/selected #52 source-adoption acceptance, never #105/#106 implementation gate | MI curator + SR policy owner; optional, no external priority mutation | | MI #17 `OPERATIONAL_SHARING_REVIEW.md`; SR #177 open local outcome consumer | Current MI operational intake remains REJECTED. No CK upload/MI receiver or external redesign needed; SR local consumption optional | #58 private export implementation, optional downstream integration | P2 CK export; CK/SR respective owners; sharing requires separate authority | | MI #16 `OPERATOR_CONTRACT.md`, SR #183 open | MI already supplies offline full snapshots, commands=[], replay=false. SR owns its observer auth/state/events; no mandatory MI live endpoint | #57 CK producer independent; CC downstream views | P1 CK; MI bounded satisfied, SR open; no CK prerequisite | | CC #2 CLOSED gap inventory, #3/#4/#6/#7/#12 OPEN; `docs/contracts.md`, `src/App.tsx` no-connections scaffold | Actual CC client/views/commands still needed downstream; CK first supplies scoped owner/worker/observer contract, no shared scheduler/permission DB/SQL reader | #57 producer, CC integration/acceptance; no CC gate on CK basic implementation | CK #57 P1; existing CC #3/#7/#12 P1, #4/#6 P2; respective owners unchanged | | SR #185 CLOSED/#186 OPEN, MI #18 CLOSED, installed/installation and machine-interface contracts | Per-version bounded compatibility exists; receive each affected supported cell. No global SR release/platform gate on CK installation | #62 implementation/integration alongside other work, #60 downstream acceptance | P2 CK, respective package owners; remaining host/platform cells unverified | The MI19 installed receipt stays frozen to MI producer `d65891668b7e79f7b666c021f02a1b4bf8c4ca9c` and SR consumer `4162f6fa9f774beaf6e92d86b7ebc92f306da4bd`; newer SR opt-in policy does not upgrade it into real-source adoption, live acceptance, billing or physical identity. PR #101 remains bounded provenance; PR #102 remains synthetic storage/ciphertext evidence. Documentation-status/impact corrections are being prepared on ordinary branch `issue-103-publish-architecture-backlog`, with no product-code changes; they are not canonical until reviewed/integrated. Final independent consistency review and delegated acceptance are still pending.
kilo commented 2026-10-27 00:35:52 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Phase A Body Read-Back Complete

Supported MCP publication and separate read-backs completed for all required issue bodies. Active ranks/numbered acceptance criteria: #52 P2/6, #55 P3/5, #56 P1/6, #57 P1/6, #58 P2/5, #59 P1/6, #60 P2/6, #62 P2/5. #105 and #106 each have P1 and six functional criteria; #103 has P1 maintenance scope and remains in its pre-existing CLOSED state. Every functional issue remains OPEN, with unchanged titles/labels/comments. The full prior bodies were compared unchanged as the suffix under Historical Scope And Evidence, and complete comment records (IDs, bodies and timestamps) were refetched unchanged. Named partial/rejected deliveries and counters remain evidence, not full acceptance.

Verification body timestamps at publication: #52 00:30:58Z; #55 00:31:31Z; #56 00:32:03Z; #57 00:30:48Z; #58 00:31:22Z; #59 00:32:33Z; #60 00:32:07Z; #62 00:32:44Z. Subsequent cross-references can change Forgejo updated_at without changing the body; these are observed read-back cuts, not immutable semantic body digests.

Actual #105/#106 identities appear in current scope/dependency/link records. Full payloads include the integrated ADR 0012/ADR 0011/shared constraints, no basic-work Router/MI/Console gate, offline installed functional behavior rather than fake-only deliverables, and separately authorized live acceptance. No priority label or independent scheduler was introduced. All 28 native edges and inverses were separately verified as described in comment19261.

This establishes publication/read-back, not delegated acceptance. Fresh independent whole-subject consistency review is the next gate. Documentation-only status/impact corrections will receive their own exact-HEAD review and required checks before any permitted integration.

## Phase A Body Read-Back Complete Supported MCP publication and separate read-backs completed for all required issue bodies. Active ranks/numbered acceptance criteria: #52 P2/6, #55 P3/5, #56 P1/6, #57 P1/6, #58 P2/5, #59 P1/6, #60 P2/6, #62 P2/5. #105 and #106 each have P1 and six functional criteria; #103 has P1 maintenance scope and remains in its pre-existing CLOSED state. Every functional issue remains OPEN, with unchanged titles/labels/comments. The full prior bodies were compared unchanged as the suffix under Historical Scope And Evidence, and complete comment records (IDs, bodies and timestamps) were refetched unchanged. Named partial/rejected deliveries and counters remain evidence, not full acceptance. Verification body timestamps at publication: #52 00:30:58Z; #55 00:31:31Z; #56 00:32:03Z; #57 00:30:48Z; #58 00:31:22Z; #59 00:32:33Z; #60 00:32:07Z; #62 00:32:44Z. Subsequent cross-references can change Forgejo updated_at without changing the body; these are observed read-back cuts, not immutable semantic body digests. Actual #105/#106 identities appear in current scope/dependency/link records. Full payloads include the integrated ADR 0012/ADR 0011/shared constraints, no basic-work Router/MI/Console gate, offline installed functional behavior rather than fake-only deliverables, and separately authorized live acceptance. No priority label or independent scheduler was introduced. All 28 native edges and inverses were separately verified as described in comment19261. This establishes publication/read-back, not delegated acceptance. Fresh independent whole-subject consistency review is the next gate. Documentation-only status/impact corrections will receive their own exact-HEAD review and required checks before any permitted integration.
kilo commented 2026-10-27 00:56:40 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED

Delegated, evidence-conditioned objective consistency acceptance, under the owner's direct 2026-10-27T00:24:56Z instruction and previously approved architectural criteria. This is not a claim the owner personally performed the independent postpublication review, not full functional/product acceptance, and not live/production GO.

Passed Gates

  1. PR #104 remains integrated in canonical develop at merge ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4, reviewed head c0d5a65ffee7411e359b66c9a980887cdb5102d7, ancestry/tree verified. ADR 0012 is authoritative; its preparation-time pending wording is historical.
  2. Actual functional issues #105 and #106 are registered after fresh dedup. Required active scopes/ACs/shared constraints/priorities were published to #52/#55/#56/#57/#58/#59/#60/#62 and maintenance #103. All previous bodies remain intact under Historical Scope And Evidence; comments, partial deliveries, failures, review counters and exact wontfix15/30/37/44 exclusions remain preserved. Publication receipts: comment19261 and comment19291.
  3. All 28 native dependencies and exact inverse lists were read back across23issues with terminal empty pages; no cycles or prohibited dependency, no mandatory Router/MI/Console gate on basic work. Closed predecessor acceptance was independently verified to its precise bounded source/receipt scope, not inferred from state.
  4. Fresh separate read-only independent review task ses_e853557ddffea9obFIuEra7cZy, conserved #103 ordinal 2/10, returned ALIGNMENT_PASS, no material findings, on actual canonical source/issues observed00:37-00:43UTC (final refs00:43:01Z). It inspected all14openissues, actual bodies/comments/graph, closed predecessors/currentcode and exact SR/MI/CC contracts. No unresolved material discrepancy remains.
  5. Fresh native full-PR reviewer ses_e852e4c13ffeUzzx9daBunwgp0, ordinal 3/10, independently reviewed the separate documentation-status/impact correction PR #107 at HEAD ff9e52da1652e7c40d69fdf730b4d9cdf417dcf6, base/merge-base ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4: APPROVE, findings[], limitations[]. Complete15-file docs-only delta, canonical publication/28-edge graph and pinned external source inspected; independent closed/offline make check and package-check passed; clean exact refs rechecked. Prior PR104 ordinal1 remains consumed. No counter reset.
  6. Parent required make check passed1516tests/85optional-native skips/106subtests, all static/import/secret/diff gates; package-check passed reproducible wheel/sdist/isolated install/smokes; final documentation link test4passed. Effective author/committer Adrian Tkacz, normal scoped commit/push, clean checkout. No productcode/tests/tooling/dependencies/.kilo changed by this publication.
  7. Final currentness after review: fetched canonical develop remains ace7175e; PR107 remains open/unmerged todevelop at exact approved head/base; current103comments contain no newer conflicting owner decision. No external repository mutation.

Accepted Published Graph And Ranks

P1: #105 none; #106 <- #105/#59/#56/#49/#54; #56 <- #48/#49/#54; #59 <- #48/#50/#61/#90; #57 <- #59/#106; #103 maintenance none.
P2: #52 <- #47/#51; #58 <- #56/#106/#54; #62 none wholeissue; #60 <- #105/#106/#52/#56/#57/#58/#59/#62.
P3: #55 <- #105. P0 none. Active fields supersede only historical descriptive priorities; /loop ordering unchanged.

Cross-Project And Remaining Local Gates

The CK-local matrix in comment19261 and reviewed PR107 is verified at SR 4a182affa4775a4a38b47860ad7622a099c56c4a, MI 8f572c332db8290b5dad9e03f5b0f960271a8349, CC 417372f189874a01dc0cd0ea9d494f18f4c180a4. SR owns models/sources/quota/admission/gateway; MI publication/provenance; CC consumer views/authorized command forwarding; CK work/authority/envelopes/acceptance. SR222/223 default-off D082 policy is integrated but real-source positive adoption remains unestablished. Exact Kilo multipart compatibility, future remote call-fact transport, remote exposure, live budgets/accounts/effects, real keys/profiles/platform/release and new sharing are issue/profile-local gates, not unfinished architecture alignment or prerequisites for unrelated basic work. MI17 operational sharing remains rejected.

Completion And Continuation

#103 was already CLOSED at00:21:03Z before publication; its state is preserved without reopening/reclosing. This receipt, not that early closure, establishes completion of canonical publication and delegated consistency acceptance. PR107 is currently independently approved but UNMERGED; no claim its documentation corrections are already canonical. It is the remaining scoped documentation integration artifact and must use normal exact-head supported PR integration, never direct develop push.

The owner-authorized normal /loop continuation may now begin in this same sole primary context, retaining all histories/counters and a fresh full canonical SELECT before functional implementation. At this receipt, /loop transition and functional implementation have not yet been claimed. Owner-facing Polish publication/acceptance report precedes that transition; no redundant owner confirmation is required.

## ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED **Delegated, evidence-conditioned objective consistency acceptance**, under the owner's direct 2026-10-27T00:24:56Z instruction and previously approved architectural criteria. This is not a claim the owner personally performed the independent postpublication review, not full functional/product acceptance, and not live/production GO. ### Passed Gates 1. PR #104 remains integrated in canonical develop at merge `ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4`, reviewed head `c0d5a65ffee7411e359b66c9a980887cdb5102d7`, ancestry/tree verified. ADR 0012 is authoritative; its preparation-time pending wording is historical. 2. Actual functional issues #105 and #106 are registered after fresh dedup. Required active scopes/ACs/shared constraints/priorities were published to #52/#55/#56/#57/#58/#59/#60/#62 and maintenance #103. All previous bodies remain intact under Historical Scope And Evidence; comments, partial deliveries, failures, review counters and exact wontfix15/30/37/44 exclusions remain preserved. Publication receipts: comment19261 and comment19291. 3. All 28 native dependencies and exact inverse lists were read back across23issues with terminal empty pages; no cycles or prohibited dependency, no mandatory Router/MI/Console gate on basic work. Closed predecessor acceptance was independently verified to its precise bounded source/receipt scope, not inferred from state. 4. Fresh separate read-only independent review task `ses_e853557ddffea9obFIuEra7cZy`, conserved #103 ordinal **2/10**, returned **ALIGNMENT_PASS**, no material findings, on actual canonical source/issues observed00:37-00:43UTC (final refs00:43:01Z). It inspected all14openissues, actual bodies/comments/graph, closed predecessors/currentcode and exact SR/MI/CC contracts. No unresolved material discrepancy remains. 5. Fresh native full-PR reviewer `ses_e852e4c13ffeUzzx9daBunwgp0`, ordinal **3/10**, independently reviewed the separate documentation-status/impact correction PR #107 at HEAD `ff9e52da1652e7c40d69fdf730b4d9cdf417dcf6`, base/merge-base `ace7175e087cd70e207594f5631c8f4f70fabfd4`: **APPROVE**, findings[], limitations[]. Complete15-file docs-only delta, canonical publication/28-edge graph and pinned external source inspected; independent closed/offline make check and package-check passed; clean exact refs rechecked. Prior PR104 ordinal1 remains consumed. No counter reset. 6. Parent required make check passed1516tests/85optional-native skips/106subtests, all static/import/secret/diff gates; package-check passed reproducible wheel/sdist/isolated install/smokes; final documentation link test4passed. Effective author/committer Adrian Tkacz, normal scoped commit/push, clean checkout. No productcode/tests/tooling/dependencies/.kilo changed by this publication. 7. Final currentness after review: fetched canonical develop remains ace7175e; PR107 remains open/unmerged todevelop at exact approved head/base; current103comments contain no newer conflicting owner decision. No external repository mutation. ### Accepted Published Graph And Ranks P1: #105 none; #106 <- #105/#59/#56/#49/#54; #56 <- #48/#49/#54; #59 <- #48/#50/#61/#90; #57 <- #59/#106; #103 maintenance none. P2: #52 <- #47/#51; #58 <- #56/#106/#54; #62 none wholeissue; #60 <- #105/#106/#52/#56/#57/#58/#59/#62. P3: #55 <- #105. P0 none. Active fields supersede only historical descriptive priorities; /loop ordering unchanged. ### Cross-Project And Remaining Local Gates The CK-local matrix in comment19261 and reviewed PR107 is verified at SR `4a182affa4775a4a38b47860ad7622a099c56c4a`, MI `8f572c332db8290b5dad9e03f5b0f960271a8349`, CC `417372f189874a01dc0cd0ea9d494f18f4c180a4`. SR owns models/sources/quota/admission/gateway; MI publication/provenance; CC consumer views/authorized command forwarding; CK work/authority/envelopes/acceptance. SR222/223 default-off D082 policy is integrated but real-source positive adoption remains unestablished. Exact Kilo multipart compatibility, future remote call-fact transport, remote exposure, live budgets/accounts/effects, real keys/profiles/platform/release and new sharing are issue/profile-local gates, not unfinished architecture alignment or prerequisites for unrelated basic work. MI17 operational sharing remains rejected. ### Completion And Continuation #103 was already CLOSED at00:21:03Z before publication; its state is preserved without reopening/reclosing. This receipt, not that early closure, establishes completion of canonical publication and delegated consistency acceptance. PR107 is currently independently approved but UNMERGED; no claim its documentation corrections are already canonical. It is the remaining scoped documentation integration artifact and must use normal exact-head supported PR integration, never direct develop push. The owner-authorized normal /loop continuation may now begin in this same sole primary context, retaining all histories/counters and a fresh full canonical SELECT before functional implementation. At this receipt, /loop transition and functional implementation have not yet been claimed. Owner-facing Polish publication/acceptance report precedes that transition; no redundant owner confirmation is required.
kilo commented 2026-10-27 01:00:12 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Integrated Completion And Actual /loop Transition

After evidence-conditioned ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED comment19309 and the owner-facing Polish publication/acceptance report, normal /loop continuation was activated in the same sole primary Kilo context as invocation kernel-loop-20261027T005900Z, under the owner's explicit PhaseD instruction. No second controller/session, custom launcher, command rewrite or inferred authority.

The already-delivered scoped documentation follow-through was completed through existing FINISH/MERGE gates: fresh native exact-HEAD APPROVE3/10, findings[], required parent/independent makecheck/packagecheck and exactCI3257PASS, clean exact refs/final MCP currentness; supported normal MCP merge of PR #107 succeeded at00:59:26Z, merge e2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5. Normal fetch/local fast-forward received that exact canonical develop; approved HEAD ff9e52da is an ancestor and complete merge tree equals the independently reviewed head, with empty diff/clean status. This is normal PR integration, not a direct develop push, force or auto-merge.

The canonical status/real-ID/priority/dependency/impact documentation corrections are NOW integrated, not merely an unmerged proposed update. ADR0012 meaning/product boundaries remain unchanged, product source unchanged. Earlier comments accurately describe their prior observation cuts.

#103's pre-existing CLOSED state is preserved; publication, delegated objective acceptance and reviewed documentation integration now have actual receipts. Historical103reviewordinals1/2/3 remain consumed. Full product/live acceptance is not claimed.

A fresh exhaustive postacceptance canonical SELECT is underway for functional continuation; no functional issue is selected merely from the historical plan or this PR. Its current priorities/dependencies/receipts/producer evidence will determine the next issue, followed by postselection revalidation before source edits. At this completion comment functional implementation has not started. Exact Kilo multipart, remote metering, optional MI/CC and production authority gaps remain issue-local. No external repository mutation, live inference/effect, key/profile migration, main/release/deployment occurred.

## Integrated Completion And Actual /loop Transition After evidence-conditioned ARCHITECTURE_BACKLOG_ALIGNED comment19309 and the owner-facing Polish publication/acceptance report, normal `/loop` continuation was activated in the same sole primary Kilo context as invocation `kernel-loop-20261027T005900Z`, under the owner's explicit PhaseD instruction. No second controller/session, custom launcher, command rewrite or inferred authority. The already-delivered scoped documentation follow-through was completed through existing FINISH/MERGE gates: fresh native exact-HEAD APPROVE3/10, findings[], required parent/independent makecheck/packagecheck and exactCI3257PASS, clean exact refs/final MCP currentness; supported normal MCP merge of PR #107 succeeded at00:59:26Z, merge **`e2348656238a2ff9a3244868e2beb543d86f15a5`**. Normal fetch/local fast-forward received that exact canonical develop; approved HEAD ff9e52da is an ancestor and complete merge tree equals the independently reviewed head, with empty diff/clean status. This is normal PR integration, not a direct develop push, force or auto-merge. The canonical status/real-ID/priority/dependency/impact documentation corrections are NOW integrated, not merely an unmerged proposed update. ADR0012 meaning/product boundaries remain unchanged, product source unchanged. Earlier comments accurately describe their prior observation cuts. #103's pre-existing CLOSED state is preserved; publication, delegated objective acceptance and reviewed documentation integration now have actual receipts. Historical103reviewordinals1/2/3 remain consumed. Full product/live acceptance is not claimed. A fresh exhaustive postacceptance canonical SELECT is underway for functional continuation; no functional issue is selected merely from the historical plan or this PR. Its current priorities/dependencies/receipts/producer evidence will determine the next issue, followed by postselection revalidation before source edits. At this completion comment functional implementation has not started. Exact Kilo multipart, remote metering, optional MI/CC and production authority gaps remain issue-local. No external repository mutation, live inference/effect, key/profile migration, main/release/deployment occurred.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
develop
issue-62-installed-compatibility
issue-58-private-outcome-export
issue-57-recovery-preparation-alerts
issue-57-owner-served-state
issue-106-final-authority-dag
issue-106-forgejo-ordinary-execution
issue-105-independent-provider-drivers
issue-59-work-resource-ownership
issue-56-atomic-approval-recovery
issue-56-work-budget-enforcement
issue-103-publish-architecture-backlog
issue-62-platform-reception
issue-55-mi-utilized-reference
issue-52-kilo-offline-proof
docs/conversational-review-policy
issue-60-reception-fixture-plan
issue-62-compatibility-matrix-spec
issue-58-export-rights-spec
issue-57-owner-state-spec
issue-56-task-cost-shapes
issue-90-owned-cancellation
issue-54-product-review
issue-53-runtime-integration
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
bug
Something is not working

  
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement
New feature

  
help wanted
Need some help

  
invalid
Something is wrong

  
question
More information is needed

  
wontfix
This won't be fixed

No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#103
No description provided.