Creatidy/scarcity-router
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 13 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

G05: Map rich Kernel task and harness requirements into monotone Router eligibility #175

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-04 22:20:24 +00:00 by kilo · 6 comments
kilo commented 2026-10-04 22:20:24 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Goal

Product owner: Scarcity Router, Kernel requirement producer; G05, dependencies G04/G10/G12. Source: Creatidy shared architecture v1.0 (2026-10-04), sections 1-5, 7-13, 14-18 supplied in #173. Establish and implement the missing, justified requirement interpretation without a second quality scale or duplicated model inventory.

Why and Evidence

Router develop 8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b: selection_types.TaskRequirement stores task_level/capability_minima/hard_constraints; HardConstraints has nine typed members. selector.tighten_requirement and routing_core bind profile/structural compatibility monotonically; tests/test_routing_core.py::AuthorizationTests.test_request_tightens_but_never_loosens_the_profile_requirement covers existing behavior. routing_core explicitly uses L0 and empty minima for unprofiled execution. This is honest existing generic-client behavior, not proof that a rich Kernel quality specification reached execution. Protocol/harness/version, data/spending authority and accepted-result criteria are not all expressible in the recommendation v1 requirement document. Exact needed mappings are To prove, not a license to add arbitrary fields.

Scope

Inventory real Kernel TaskSpec/WorkUnit requirement and harness declarations against current public recommendation, routing/client/admission contracts. Produce a field/semantic coverage table with supported, mapped, unknown and unrepresentable cases. Decide which requirement belongs in capability minima, hard model properties, channel compatibility, authorization or caller-owned acceptance. Implement only justified missing Router interpretation through an explicit additive or versioned contract decision; preserve the current capability rubric. Pin Kernel producer fixtures and consumer adapter versions.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Representative coding, analysis/editorial, specific-model, tool/continuation, known-context and restricted-data tasks map to one authoritative requirement pipeline with provenance. Quality minima are supplied/expanded, never inferred from price, L-level or model name; every required dimension passes independently.
  2. Stronger requirements can only reduce the eligible pool. Contradictory/unsupported requirements produce actionable validation/no-solution explanations, not dropped constraints, relaxed minima or guessed compatible harnesses.
  3. Tests demonstrate channel compatibility + model capability + admin/client authorization intersection; model-capable but channel-incompatible fails before inference. Unknown/unsupported/false/null remain distinct as each owning contract defines them.
  4. No second Kernel inventory, no invented per-request allowed_models list, no unapproved global ontology/ranking, no prompt classifier as mandatory intake. Generic unprofiled clients retain shipped semantics unless an explicit compatibility decision authorizes change.
  5. Producer-consumer conformance tests cover missing/unknown fields, older clients, malformed tightening, no candidate, stale compatibility evidence and client attempts to enlarge authority. Schema/config migration and readable diagnostics/onboarding are included when changed.
  6. Full gates plus evidence-backed review of actual task-requirement transmission; synthetic proof does not claim live task readiness.

Dependencies, Reuse, Priority and Authority

First-priority prerequisite to G04 end-to-end correctness: savings cannot compensate for missing quality specification. Kernel owns production of requirements/acceptance, Router interpretation; Kernel counterpart not found at registration. Known foundation: Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#11 and #37. Coordinate with G10 actual protocol/identity and G12 supported source/request limits, then integrate executable recommendation.
Reuse TaskRequirement, TaskProfileCatalog, tighten_requirement, route_request, effective limits (#136/D-058) and existing negative/parity tests. Any external pool-restriction pattern (e.g. OpenRouter) is a candidate only: inspect exact source/revision/license, semantics, negative/security tests, dependency/maintenance before adoption. No product inference, secrets, workspace operations or Kernel implementation here. Future inference/real harness tests require separate owner authority. Refs #173, #87, #136, #146.

## Goal **Product owner: Scarcity Router**, Kernel requirement producer; G05, dependencies G04/G10/G12. Source: Creatidy shared architecture v1.0 (2026-10-04), sections 1-5, 7-13, 14-18 supplied in #173. Establish and implement the missing, justified requirement interpretation without a second quality scale or duplicated model inventory. ## Why and Evidence Router develop `8d9d4b04bcb23fe19ff702b6209fbcb1537cdf1b`: `selection_types.TaskRequirement` stores task_level/capability_minima/hard_constraints; `HardConstraints` has nine typed members. `selector.tighten_requirement` and `routing_core` bind profile/structural compatibility monotonically; `tests/test_routing_core.py::AuthorizationTests.test_request_tightens_but_never_loosens_the_profile_requirement` covers existing behavior. `routing_core` explicitly uses L0 and empty minima for unprofiled execution. This is honest existing generic-client behavior, not proof that a rich Kernel quality specification reached execution. Protocol/harness/version, data/spending authority and accepted-result criteria are not all expressible in the recommendation v1 requirement document. Exact needed mappings are To prove, not a license to add arbitrary fields. ## Scope Inventory real Kernel TaskSpec/WorkUnit requirement and harness declarations against current public recommendation, routing/client/admission contracts. Produce a field/semantic coverage table with supported, mapped, unknown and unrepresentable cases. Decide which requirement belongs in capability minima, hard model properties, channel compatibility, authorization or caller-owned acceptance. Implement only justified missing Router interpretation through an explicit additive or versioned contract decision; preserve the current capability rubric. Pin Kernel producer fixtures and consumer adapter versions. ## Acceptance Criteria 1. Representative coding, analysis/editorial, specific-model, tool/continuation, known-context and restricted-data tasks map to one authoritative requirement pipeline with provenance. Quality minima are supplied/expanded, never inferred from price, L-level or model name; every required dimension passes independently. 2. Stronger requirements can only reduce the eligible pool. Contradictory/unsupported requirements produce actionable validation/no-solution explanations, not dropped constraints, relaxed minima or guessed compatible harnesses. 3. Tests demonstrate channel compatibility + model capability + admin/client authorization intersection; model-capable but channel-incompatible fails before inference. Unknown/unsupported/false/null remain distinct as each owning contract defines them. 4. No second Kernel inventory, no invented per-request allowed_models list, no unapproved global ontology/ranking, no prompt classifier as mandatory intake. Generic unprofiled clients retain shipped semantics unless an explicit compatibility decision authorizes change. 5. Producer-consumer conformance tests cover missing/unknown fields, older clients, malformed tightening, no candidate, stale compatibility evidence and client attempts to enlarge authority. Schema/config migration and readable diagnostics/onboarding are included when changed. 6. Full gates plus evidence-backed review of actual task-requirement transmission; synthetic proof does not claim live task readiness. ## Dependencies, Reuse, Priority and Authority First-priority prerequisite to G04 end-to-end correctness: savings cannot compensate for missing quality specification. Kernel owns production of requirements/acceptance, Router interpretation; Kernel counterpart not found at registration. Known foundation: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/11 and #37. Coordinate with G10 actual protocol/identity and G12 supported source/request limits, then integrate executable recommendation. Reuse `TaskRequirement`, `TaskProfileCatalog`, `tighten_requirement`, `route_request`, effective limits (#136/D-058) and existing negative/parity tests. Any external pool-restriction pattern (e.g. OpenRouter) is a candidate only: inspect exact source/revision/license, semantics, negative/security tests, dependency/maintenance before adoption. No product inference, secrets, workspace operations or Kernel implementation here. Future inference/real harness tests require separate owner authority. Refs #173, #87, #136, #146.
kilo commented 2026-10-04 23:06:44 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Cross-product closeout reread found requirement producer/consumer tasks: Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#49 prepares/authorizes versioned ordinary-task specs; Creatidy/creatidy-kernel#51 propagates them to Router without L0 fallback. Public evidence/calibration ownership is Creatidy/model-intelligence#14, not another quality scale. These refine the registration-time missing links; agree actual supported mapping here, then Kernel transmits it, then #174/Kernel #52 executable reception. Unknown privacy/protocol/access constraints must not be silently dropped; unprofiled generic-client compatibility remains distinct.

Cross-product closeout reread found requirement producer/consumer tasks: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/49 prepares/authorizes versioned ordinary-task specs; https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/creatidy-kernel/issues/51 propagates them to Router without L0 fallback. Public evidence/calibration ownership is https://forgejo.creatidy.com/Creatidy/model-intelligence/issues/14, not another quality scale. These refine the registration-time missing links; agree actual supported mapping here, then Kernel transmits it, then #174/Kernel #52 executable reception. Unknown privacy/protocol/access constraints must not be silently dropped; unprofiled generic-client compatibility remains distinct.
kilo commented 2026-10-05 22:22:00 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

SAME /loop invocation2026-10-05T12:38:32Z selected #175 after fresh exhaustive18-issue queue/exact-label exclusions. Bounded read-only actual producer inspection identifies an external evidence/prerequisite gap, not a test/tool failure or request for invented minima.

Pinned Kernel develop72aedfd51e357f52e90c58f1302f60bc0a92f0dd: adapters/task_execution.py345-364 TaskSpec contains frozen task/source/instruction/path/verification/structural/attempt/PR fields, not rich quality/interface/locality/spending/harness requirements; core/domain.py340-393/430-535 WorkUnit/ProgramSpec supply acceptance/policy/provenance/count-budget/authority, not calibrated minima. core/resources.py1-25 ResourceRequest has workunitID, opaque capability identifiers and contextint only. ports/application.py92-113 emits reference+128; adapters/scarcity_router.py412-421 accepts referenceONLY and sendsL0/empty minima/tools. This literal context/reference compatibility is not actual task-quality transmission. Separate runtime version checks do not transmit harness constraints.

Current directly linked Kernel49/51 and MI14 remain OPEN; contract/ADR source distinguishes rich targets from approved wire semantics. Safe inspection succeeded; no connector/access/credential blocker. Current Router requirement/profile/tightening can consume supplied minima but cannot derive absent approved meaning from instructions, L-level, model name, acceptance strings or count budgets. Inventing Kernel declarations/ontology, synthetic future producer evidence or implementing other repositories is outside this loop authority. No rich actual-transmission claim or acceptance revision made.

BLOCKED on unavailable approved rich producer/semantic evidence needed for AC1/5/6. Kernel approved declarations and shared mapping/transmission evidence must exist before this delivery can honestly satisfy those criteria; source/contract inspection is evidence, not implementation. No #175 branch/PR/commit or review created (count0), clean Router develop662facdc75fea06c500a538face0d0477e230959. Loop stops rather than skipping selected work. #178 and deterministic#179 are integrated/closed; OPEN real-harness gate174/181 and180 authority remain preserved. No cross-repo mutation or live inference occurred.

SAME /loop invocation2026-10-05T12:38:32Z selected #175 after fresh exhaustive18-issue queue/exact-label exclusions. Bounded read-only actual producer inspection identifies an external evidence/prerequisite gap, not a test/tool failure or request for invented minima. Pinned Kernel develop72aedfd51e357f52e90c58f1302f60bc0a92f0dd: adapters/task_execution.py345-364 TaskSpec contains frozen task/source/instruction/path/verification/structural/attempt/PR fields, not rich quality/interface/locality/spending/harness requirements; core/domain.py340-393/430-535 WorkUnit/ProgramSpec supply acceptance/policy/provenance/count-budget/authority, not calibrated minima. core/resources.py1-25 ResourceRequest has workunitID, opaque capability identifiers and contextint only. ports/application.py92-113 emits reference+128; adapters/scarcity_router.py412-421 accepts referenceONLY and sendsL0/empty minima/tools. This literal context/reference compatibility is not actual task-quality transmission. Separate runtime version checks do not transmit harness constraints. Current directly linked Kernel49/51 and MI14 remain OPEN; contract/ADR source distinguishes rich targets from approved wire semantics. Safe inspection succeeded; no connector/access/credential blocker. Current Router requirement/profile/tightening can consume supplied minima but cannot derive absent approved meaning from instructions, L-level, model name, acceptance strings or count budgets. Inventing Kernel declarations/ontology, synthetic future producer evidence or implementing other repositories is outside this loop authority. No rich actual-transmission claim or acceptance revision made. BLOCKED on unavailable approved rich producer/semantic evidence needed for AC1/5/6. Kernel approved declarations and shared mapping/transmission evidence must exist before this delivery can honestly satisfy those criteria; source/contract inspection is evidence, not implementation. No #175 branch/PR/commit or review created (count0), clean Router develop662facdc75fea06c500a538face0d0477e230959. Loop stops rather than skipping selected work. #178 and deterministic#179 are integrated/closed; OPEN real-harness gate174/181 and180 authority remain preserved. No cross-repo mutation or live inference occurred.
kilo commented 2026-10-06 00:47:43 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Owner-authorized shared workflow correction is integrated in Router PR196 and counterpart Kernel72/MI30/Console24. SAME Router invocation2026-10-05T12:38:32Z resumes automatically. This corrects the earlier whole-loop BLOCKED disposition without changing #175 acceptance or implementing it.

Fresh #175 record remains open/unchanged; inspected Kernel producer paths at72aedfd are byte-unchanged in integrated9dfa209, so the missing approved rich declarations/transmission evidence remains a factual gate. #175 has no implementation branch/PR/commit/substantive edits or review (count0).

Under current post-selection eligibility rule: missingproducer beforedelivery => temporarilyineligible for currentcycle => NONTERMINAL return to full fresh SELECT. No invented semantics, closure, labels, scope revision, live effects or Kernel/MI feature mutation. Prior178/179 deliveries/ownerdecisions/counters preserved. The loop continues other eligible work; current gating is not whole-loop BLOCKED.

Owner-authorized shared workflow correction is integrated in Router PR196 and counterpart Kernel72/MI30/Console24. SAME Router invocation2026-10-05T12:38:32Z resumes automatically. This corrects the earlier whole-loop BLOCKED disposition without changing #175 acceptance or implementing it. Fresh #175 record remains open/unchanged; inspected Kernel producer paths at72aedfd are byte-unchanged in integrated9dfa209, so the missing approved rich declarations/transmission evidence remains a factual gate. #175 has no implementation branch/PR/commit/substantive edits or review (count0). Under current post-selection eligibility rule: missingproducer beforedelivery => temporarilyineligible for currentcycle => NONTERMINAL return to full fresh SELECT. No invented semantics, closure, labels, scope revision, live effects or Kernel/MI feature mutation. Prior178/179 deliveries/ownerdecisions/counters preserved. The loop continues other eligible work; current gating is not whole-loop BLOCKED.
kilo commented 2026-10-07 21:48:41 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Selected under SAME invocation 2026-10-06T16:00:17Z after owner-authorized #180/#199 decomposition, actual #180 closure and fresh complete 16-issue queue/exact-label exclusions/current comments/dependencies. This preserves all earlier #175 absent-producer evidence and count0; it does not restart a STOP_REVISE or reset #180's five reviews.

The prerequisite evidence changed: Kernel #49 / PR #73 is integrated at a9a65006cc8cc5b5e4468746a18ff51daf742e6b. Exact source inspection confirms approved Declaration v1 text arrays and full RequirementsHandoff reaching the actual ScarcityRouterAllocator refusal seam unchanged. This is approved meaning, not numeric minima/profile/model/harness semantics or successful mapping. Kernel #51 explicitly follows Router #175 mapping agreement; requiring #51 completion first would invert the ownership/order.

ONE normal issue branch from current canonical Router base 8a0ae13d4b4de96abc1d127c855803ee5e5af5a1; contract-first proposal commit 5e75fd4fbcbb8c970c71254fde3f4044c52f3249, PR #200: BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router#200. Two existing documents add a PROPOSED D-075 and source-grounded coverage/interpretation boundary. Explicit versioned markers would carry existing complete TaskRequirement/RequestBinding shapes inside already accepted string fields, binding the supplied choice to approved bytes; no inference from prose/price/model/L-level. Unrepresentable quality/interface/context/privacy remains a bound pre-selection refusal; caller acceptance and authority are not grants. No accepted syntax or feature implementation is claimed.

Locked sanitized full gate PASS2738 tests/17 skips/599.644s, both basedpyright checks zero diagnostics, whitespace PASS; exact recorder patch matches unchanged committed source. This proves proposal/unchanged-runtime safety, not missing rich transmission. Independent contract feedback comes before implementation; every whole-PR dispatch counts toward the same #175 ceiling. All six AC remain mandatory and this proposal cannot be merged/closed as feature completion. No Kernel/MI mutation, private credential inspection, model-call probe, live execution or deployment.

Selected under SAME invocation `2026-10-06T16:00:17Z` after owner-authorized #180/#199 decomposition, actual #180 closure and fresh complete 16-issue queue/exact-label exclusions/current comments/dependencies. This preserves all earlier #175 absent-producer evidence and count0; it does not restart a STOP_REVISE or reset #180's five reviews. The prerequisite evidence changed: Kernel #49 / PR #73 is integrated at `a9a65006cc8cc5b5e4468746a18ff51daf742e6b`. Exact source inspection confirms approved Declaration v1 text arrays and full RequirementsHandoff reaching the actual ScarcityRouterAllocator refusal seam unchanged. This is approved meaning, not numeric minima/profile/model/harness semantics or successful mapping. Kernel #51 explicitly follows Router #175 mapping agreement; requiring #51 completion first would invert the ownership/order. ONE normal issue branch from current canonical Router base `8a0ae13d4b4de96abc1d127c855803ee5e5af5a1`; contract-first proposal commit `5e75fd4fbcbb8c970c71254fde3f4044c52f3249`, PR #200: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/pulls/200. Two existing documents add a PROPOSED D-075 and source-grounded coverage/interpretation boundary. Explicit versioned markers would carry existing complete TaskRequirement/RequestBinding shapes inside already accepted string fields, binding the supplied choice to approved bytes; no inference from prose/price/model/L-level. Unrepresentable quality/interface/context/privacy remains a bound pre-selection refusal; caller acceptance and authority are not grants. No accepted syntax or feature implementation is claimed. Locked sanitized full gate PASS2738 tests/17 skips/599.644s, both basedpyright checks zero diagnostics, whitespace PASS; exact recorder patch matches unchanged committed source. This proves proposal/unchanged-runtime safety, not missing rich transmission. Independent contract feedback comes before implementation; every whole-PR dispatch counts toward the same #175 ceiling. All six AC remain mandatory and this proposal cannot be merged/closed as feature completion. No Kernel/MI mutation, private credential inspection, model-call probe, live execution or deployment.
kilo commented 2026-10-07 22:41:40 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Contract-first whole-PR review ordinal 1 completed at proposal HEAD 5e75fd4fbcbb8c970c71254fde3f4044c52f3249: COMMENT, no findings, not feature/merge approval. Independent exact producer/source inspection supports a bounded local interpreter, while preserving unsupported actual textual meanings and the Kernel #51-after-agreement ordering. The count1 is retained.

Implementation proceeds on the same PR #200 through the existing resolver and authoritative competitive/exact-admission pipeline, not synthetic per-request profiles or a second selector. Explicit TaskRequirement data carries unchanged per-dimension minima; profile markers must include the approved expanded floor and cached mappings check version AND actual content; marker aliases cannot replace trusted client aliases. Resolved hard demands also gate actual channel/context/output capability, with unsupported vision and insufficient caller output ceiling refused. Raw meaning/credentials are not diagnostic output; original declaration digest and ownership/coverage remain explicit. The pinned Kernel allocator still refuses before transport; no claim that #51 is implemented.

This requirement/privacy/authorization-fidelity implementation is explicitly classified security_critical for delivery review. After final full validation and ordinary independent approval at stable exact HEAD/base, obtain the additional independent gpt-daybreak-blue-latest gate through direct Codex, no Kilo discovery/dispatch/substitute. Every whole-PR dispatch continues the same #175 counter; no review budget reset.

Current focused existing/new core/gateway/frozen REST+MCP tests: 291 PASS, zero type diagnostics, whitespace PASS. Final full gate and a fresh complete implementation review remain pending; no merge/closure is claimed.

Contract-first whole-PR review ordinal 1 completed at proposal HEAD `5e75fd4fbcbb8c970c71254fde3f4044c52f3249`: COMMENT, no findings, not feature/merge approval. Independent exact producer/source inspection supports a bounded local interpreter, while preserving unsupported actual textual meanings and the Kernel #51-after-agreement ordering. The count1 is retained. Implementation proceeds on the same PR #200 through the existing resolver and authoritative competitive/exact-admission pipeline, not synthetic per-request profiles or a second selector. Explicit TaskRequirement data carries unchanged per-dimension minima; profile markers must include the approved expanded floor and cached mappings check version AND actual content; marker aliases cannot replace trusted client aliases. Resolved hard demands also gate actual channel/context/output capability, with unsupported vision and insufficient caller output ceiling refused. Raw meaning/credentials are not diagnostic output; original declaration digest and ownership/coverage remain explicit. The pinned Kernel allocator still refuses before transport; no claim that #51 is implemented. This requirement/privacy/authorization-fidelity implementation is explicitly classified **security_critical** for delivery review. After final full validation and ordinary independent approval at stable exact HEAD/base, obtain the additional independent `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` gate through direct Codex, no Kilo discovery/dispatch/substitute. Every whole-PR dispatch continues the same #175 counter; no review budget reset. Current focused existing/new core/gateway/frozen REST+MCP tests: 291 PASS, zero type diagnostics, whitespace PASS. Final full gate and a fresh complete implementation review remain pending; no merge/closure is claimed.
kilo commented 2026-10-08 00:58:54 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Completed Router Requirement Interpretation And Core Conformance

SAME invocation 2026-10-06T16:00:17Z. PR #200 merged through canonical Forgejo into develop: BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router#200.

Approved base 8a0ae13d4b4de96abc1d127c855803ee5e5af5a1, HEAD 51e321fcaa0e5643f3975105bc01c6eba1288177; merge 5c48d51f1eb1f11424a5100eb2ccf20a6cba4581 has exactly those parents and identical approved/integrated tree 97b31d0206b3a76a62b01fcfca8f8dc6a77815b8. Four normal commits preserved (5e75fd4,3df925c,ecd9569,51e321f), no rewrite/force/branch deletion/main/release/deployment/external mutation.

All six Router-owned criteria received: exact pinned producer/field-semantic coverage/provenance; explicit independent existing minima/profile floors without inference or ordinary L0/reference fallback; monotone fixed-context constraints/refusals; actual model AND channel AND current authorization/pin intersection in competitive and exact admission; null/false/unknown/version/missing/malformed/stale/binding/old-generic parity and safe diagnostics; full gates and independent review of actual Kernel meaning/refusal versus local Root receiver/core conformance. Required output floors are not execution caps, and exact admission neither reranks nor substitutes. Unrepresentable privacy/vision/text remains unknown/unsupported, not discarded. No second inventory/ranker/ontology/allowlist or new Kernel schema/wire endpoint.

Final normal locked sanitized full gate:2755 PASS/17skip597.419s, both basedpyright checks zero diagnostics, full/staged whitespace PASS; exact tested patch/source verified. Ordinary whole-PR #4 APPROVE/no findings; mandatory independent gpt-daybreak-blue-latest #5 through direct official Codex APPROVE/no findings at the same exact base/HEAD. Historical #1COMMENT/#2–3REQUEST_CHANGES retained; no counter reset. Canonical receipt: PR comment15614.

Integrated current clean develop acceptance:293 requirement/core/selector/effective-limits/frozen REST+MCP tests PASS47.987s. Merge ancestry/tree equality and local/fetched develop exactness verified. Earlier isolated unchanged fake-worker interruption and diagnostic recovery remain in evidence; no fabricated cause or weaker test gate.

Scope boundary: pinned Kernel #49 source a9a65006 (source equal accepted 4ae082d) still preserves full current approved meaning at a real pre-transport refusal. Tagged examples are Root-owned interpretation in its actual accepted producer shape, not current successful Kernel #51 transmission. This delivery establishes the supported interpretation/agreement #51 consumes next; it does NOT implement Kernel, claim live task readiness or satisfy #174/Kernel #52 real-harness reception. It follows canonical comment14334 ordering, not a circular #51-before-175 gate. Those distinct tasks and OPEN identity/acceptance markers remain open.

Closing #175 for its implemented/validated/reviewed/integrated Router responsibility, with actual producer transmission limits preserved. #180 history/five reviews and owner-created gated #199/D-063 compatibility are unchanged; legacy retirement and full migration remain unaccepted. Continue same loop with a fresh complete canonical queue.

## Completed Router Requirement Interpretation And Core Conformance SAME invocation `2026-10-06T16:00:17Z`. PR #200 merged through canonical Forgejo into develop: https://forgejo.creatidy.com/BioMedical-IT/scarcity-router/pulls/200. Approved base `8a0ae13d4b4de96abc1d127c855803ee5e5af5a1`, HEAD `51e321fcaa0e5643f3975105bc01c6eba1288177`; merge `5c48d51f1eb1f11424a5100eb2ccf20a6cba4581` has exactly those parents and identical approved/integrated tree `97b31d0206b3a76a62b01fcfca8f8dc6a77815b8`. Four normal commits preserved (`5e75fd4`,`3df925c`,`ecd9569`,`51e321f`), no rewrite/force/branch deletion/main/release/deployment/external mutation. All six Router-owned criteria received: exact pinned producer/field-semantic coverage/provenance; explicit independent existing minima/profile floors without inference or ordinary L0/reference fallback; monotone fixed-context constraints/refusals; actual model AND channel AND current authorization/pin intersection in competitive and exact admission; null/false/unknown/version/missing/malformed/stale/binding/old-generic parity and safe diagnostics; full gates and independent review of actual Kernel meaning/refusal versus local Root receiver/core conformance. Required output floors are not execution caps, and exact admission neither reranks nor substitutes. Unrepresentable privacy/vision/text remains unknown/unsupported, not discarded. No second inventory/ranker/ontology/allowlist or new Kernel schema/wire endpoint. Final normal locked sanitized full gate:2755 PASS/17skip597.419s, both basedpyright checks zero diagnostics, full/staged whitespace PASS; exact tested patch/source verified. Ordinary whole-PR #4 APPROVE/no findings; mandatory independent `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` #5 through direct official Codex APPROVE/no findings at the same exact base/HEAD. Historical #1COMMENT/#2–3REQUEST_CHANGES retained; no counter reset. Canonical receipt: PR comment15614. Integrated current clean develop acceptance:293 requirement/core/selector/effective-limits/frozen REST+MCP tests PASS47.987s. Merge ancestry/tree equality and local/fetched develop exactness verified. Earlier isolated unchanged fake-worker interruption and diagnostic recovery remain in evidence; no fabricated cause or weaker test gate. **Scope boundary:** pinned Kernel #49 source `a9a65006` (source equal accepted `4ae082d`) still preserves full current approved meaning at a real pre-transport refusal. Tagged examples are Root-owned interpretation in its actual accepted producer shape, not current successful Kernel #51 transmission. This delivery establishes the supported interpretation/agreement #51 consumes next; it does NOT implement Kernel, claim live task readiness or satisfy #174/Kernel #52 real-harness reception. It follows canonical comment14334 ordering, not a circular #51-before-175 gate. Those distinct tasks and OPEN identity/acceptance markers remain open. Closing #175 for its implemented/validated/reviewed/integrated Router responsibility, with actual producer transmission limits preserved. #180 history/five reviews and owner-created gated #199/D-063 compatibility are unchanged; legacy retirement and full migration remain unaccepted. Continue same loop with a fresh complete canonical queue.
kilo closed this issue 2026-10-08 00:59:01 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
develop
issue-246-authorized-receipt
issue-245-mi-startup
issue-226-administrator-ux
issue-183-observer-access
issue-183-event-acceptance
issue-183-internal-events
issue-183-resource-state
issue-242-secure-bootstrap
issue-238-mi-server
issue-239-architecture-reconciliation
issue-224-certificate-lifecycle
issue-224-origin-bound-worker
issue-224-worker-ca-trust
issue-234-evidenced-resources
issue-186-installed-lifecycle
issue-186-ghcr-distribution
issue-225-cancel-paths
issue-228-backlog-disposition
issue-222-active-mi
issue-176-mi-consumer
issue-185-contract-conformance
issue-219-project-security-audit
issue-181-responses-subset
issue-214-claude-subscription
issue-205-review-result-recovery
issue-174-executable-contract
issue-215-conversational-review
issue-210-d069-review-governance
issue-212-d069a-bootstrap
issue-202-dependency-eligibility
issue-184-strict-no-payg
issue-175-kernel-requirements
issue-180-native-authority-boundary
issue-182-readable-status
issue-195-post-selection-gates
issue-179-catalog-effort
issue-178-exact-target-pin
issue-190-workflow-self-remediation
task/168-capacity-controlled-home
fix/143-scenario11-cancel-race
policy/zai-model-governance-campaign
main
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
accessibility
Barrier affecting people with disabilities

  
bug
Something isn't working

  
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement
New feature or request

  
good first issue
Good for newcomers

  
help wanted
Extra attention is needed

  
invalid
This doesn't seem right

  
P1
Owner-declared highest explicit implementation priority (loop ordering rank)

  
P2
Required product and integration work

  
P3
Deferred or producer-dependent work

  
question
Further information is requested

  
wontfix
This will not be worked on

No labels
accessibility
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
P1
P2
P3
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Blocks
#174 G04: Prove the executable recommendation, admission and exact-pin contract with Kernel
Creatidy/scarcity-router
Reference
Creatidy/scarcity-router#175
No description provided.