Explicit Kernel requirement interpretation through shared routing core (#175) #200
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
accessibility
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
P1
P2
P3
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Creatidy/scarcity-router!200
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "issue-175-kernel-requirements"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Refs #175.
Scope
Local interpretation of exact Kernel Declaration v1 with explicit versioned markers in its existing string fields carrying TaskRequirement/RequestBinding semantics. No inferred minima from prose/price/L-level/model name, ordinary L0/reference fallback, new scale/inventory/ranker/allowlist or Kernel schema field. Unsupported quality/interface/context/privacy remains a bound refusal. Original declaration digest, coverage and actual profile version/expansion remain explicit without raw meaning/scope/credential diagnostic echo; Kernel retains its full current approval/draft/evidence/decision/Program handoff.
Internal RouteRequest.task_requirement uses the authoritative competitive/exact pipeline. Exact admission uses the selector's hard/capability predicates and all request identity intersections without ranking/substitution. Independent context amounts combine before strict resolution. Required output allowance floors are separate from genuinely requested execution ceilings: no synthetic cap, no silent budget change, false-control channels remain usable when adequately evidenced, and raising the floor cannot enlarge fixed-context pools. Exact admission supplies the known pinned variant. Profile/subject changes, unsupported vision and genuine ceiling/profile contradictions refuse. Current authorization remains an intersection; generic clients and frozen REST/MCP/OpenAI/worker request shapes are preserved. M09 refusal vocabulary is additive/reuses existing codes.
D-075 distinguishes actual approved producer text/refusal from new local interpretation/conformance. Kernel49 still does NOT transmit successfully; Kernel51 adoption follows mapping agreement and #174 executable/real-harness reception remains separate. No external mutation, private dependency, live inference/provider/model-call probe/deployment or fictional integration receipt. Controller software generates markers, not repeated manual user JSON.
Exact Objects
Base/merge-base
8a0ae13d4b4de96abc1d127c855803ee5e5af5a1.HEAD
51e321fcaa0e5643f3975105bc01c6eba1288177.Four normal commits (
5e75fd4,3df925c,ecd9569,51e321f), seven scoped files. No synchronization merges, rewrite or unrelated changes.Validation/Evidence
Kernel schema evidence pin
a9a65006cc8cc5b5e4468746a18ff51daf742e6b, accepted HEAD4ae082d709b680f73e2fd067826dbaf3113a4588source/tree equal. Exact actual shape/textual fixture is inspected; tagged semantic examples are new producer-compatible reception, not current Kernel transmission.Final hard-bounded normal full gate: 2755 tests PASS, 17 skips, 597.419s; locked sanitized sync, both basedpyright checks and full/staged whitespace PASS. Focused core/selector/admission/effective-limits/gateway/resource suites: 342 PASS, types0. Exact recorded tested delta reverse-verified against unchanged committed source. Original pure conformance archive prepared for independent execution.
Excluded diagnostic-only observers delegate original full runner methods/results/exceptions and preserve all tests/child behavior/assertions; previous unchanged fake-worker interruption's unproven trigger and failed/probe receipts remain. No focused gate substitution or fabricated fix.
Gates
Historical ordinals1 COMMENT,2/3 REQUEST_CHANGES remain counted; fresh complete ordinary review pending at this exact HEAD. Explicitly security_critical (issue comment15597): afterward mandatory independent
gpt-daybreak-blue-latestthrough direct official Codex at stable exact base/HEAD before completion/merge. No Kilo inventory gate, fallback, count reset, #180 history loss or #199 retirement waiver. No current merge/closure or Kernel51 readiness claim.Contract-first proposal for explicit Kernel requirement interpretation (#175)to Explicit Kernel requirement interpretation through shared routing core (#175)Current complete-PR gates passed at base
8a0ae13d4b4de96abc1d127c855803ee5e5af5a1and HEAD51e321fcaa0e5643f3975105bc01c6eba1288177.Ordinary review ordinal4: APPROVE/empty findings, full seven-file/four-commit and all #175 criteria/source/UX inspection, independent171 original pure conformance/core tests, zero type diagnostics and canonical currentness verified.
Required security ordinal5: independent
gpt-daybreak-blue-latestthrough direct official Codex, explicit model flag/fresh ephemeral/read-only context, 900s hard bound. APPROVE/empty findings on those exact objects; independently inspected full security/authority/producer/current-meaning/core/diagnostic/compatibility source and gate provenance, independently ran171 sanitized pure tests. Dispatch identity is verified by actual CLI invocation; no model self-report physical identity inference, Kilo inventory/dispatch or substitute.Full locked sanitized normal gate:2755 PASS/17skip597.419s, both basedpyright invocations zero diagnostics, full/staged whitespace PASS, exact tested patch matches unchanged clean committed source. Historical1COMMENT/2–3REQUEST_CHANGES preserved; no counter or commit rewrite. Direct security review is additional to ordinary approval, not eligibility or live task readiness.
Acceptance is Router-local requirement interpretation and competitive/exact admission conformance. Actual pinned Kernel source still refuses ordinary translation before transport; Kernel #51's later adoption and #174/Kernel #52 executable/real-harness reception remain separate. No claim of current cross-product transmission, inference, deployment or retirement.