F. Daybreak restricted capability + security-review contract #122

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-09-24 15:23:51 +00:00 by kilo · 1 comment

kilo commented

2026-09-24 15:23:51 +00:00

Member

Child F of #116 (Dynamic Execution Sources program).

Daybreak Blue classification

Live runtime advertises gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Treat as a special RESTRICTED security capability, not a normal Luna/Sol/Astra track. Approximate classification: security_review / restricted_access / defensive_security. Re-verify current OpenAI documentation during implementation. Do not invent provider permissions.

Required design properties:

separate approval/access may be required; discovery does NOT prove execution authorization;
absence of access represented honestly;
NO silent fallback from required Daybreak review to ordinary Sol/Astra;
alias semantics explicit; requested alias and actual resolved physical model both retained in audit when the provider exposes the resolved model;
shown separately as restricted security capability; not general-routed merely because it appears in inventory;
not consumed unnecessarily during ordinary acceptance.

Security-review-gate contract

For work explicitly classified security_critical, an independent audit using gpt-daybreak-blue-latest is mandatory when the platform claims completion of that workflow. Boundary discipline: Scarcity Router is a routing/execution system, NOT a general multi-stage agent orchestrator — do NOT fake a multi-stage audit by routing one primary request through Daybreak. Determine the narrow correct architectural boundary; if multi-stage workflow belongs outside the Routing Core, keep it there and document the boundary.

Minimum durable contract usable by Program Execution Mode:

security_critical -> independent Daybreak Blue review required

If required access is unavailable: SECURITY_REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE and the gate remains OPEN/FAILED. No silent substitute model.

Program's own gate

#116 is classified security_critical. After normal GLM-5.3-Flash review + remediation, run an independent gpt-daybreak-blue-latest review through an approved available source challenging: credential isolation between two Codex sources; source-id confusion; resource ownership; inventory spoofing; server-to-worker privilege expansion; model alias confusion; exact target substitution; auth-state confusion; malicious/oversized inventory; quota-pool cross-account confusion; worker protocol authorization; sensitive account metadata leakage; audit correctness; TLS/auth boundaries. If Daybreak access cannot be exercised, record SECURITY_REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE and pause final completion at that external/human gate.

Child F of #116 (Dynamic Execution Sources program). ## Daybreak Blue classification Live runtime advertises `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest`. Treat as a special RESTRICTED security capability, not a normal Luna/Sol/Astra track. Approximate classification: `security_review` / `restricted_access` / `defensive_security`. Re-verify current OpenAI documentation during implementation. Do not invent provider permissions. Required design properties: - separate approval/access may be required; discovery does NOT prove execution authorization; - absence of access represented honestly; - NO silent fallback from required Daybreak review to ordinary Sol/Astra; - alias semantics explicit; requested alias and actual resolved physical model both retained in audit when the provider exposes the resolved model; - shown separately as restricted security capability; not general-routed merely because it appears in inventory; - not consumed unnecessarily during ordinary acceptance. ## Security-review-gate contract For work explicitly classified `security_critical`, an independent audit using `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` is mandatory when the platform claims completion of that workflow. Boundary discipline: Scarcity Router is a routing/execution system, NOT a general multi-stage agent orchestrator — do NOT fake a multi-stage audit by routing one primary request through Daybreak. Determine the narrow correct architectural boundary; if multi-stage workflow belongs outside the Routing Core, keep it there and document the boundary. Minimum durable contract usable by Program Execution Mode: ```text security_critical -> independent Daybreak Blue review required ``` If required access is unavailable: `SECURITY_REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE` and the gate remains OPEN/FAILED. No silent substitute model. ## Program's own gate #116 is classified security_critical. After normal GLM-5.3-Flash review + remediation, run an independent `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` review through an approved available source challenging: credential isolation between two Codex sources; source-id confusion; resource ownership; inventory spoofing; server-to-worker privilege expansion; model alias confusion; exact target substitution; auth-state confusion; malicious/oversized inventory; quota-pool cross-account confusion; worker protocol authorization; sensitive account metadata leakage; audit correctness; TLS/auth boundaries. If Daybreak access cannot be exercised, record `SECURITY_REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE` and pause final completion at that external/human gate.

kilo referenced this issue

2026-09-24 19:14:20 +00:00

Dynamic Execution Sources, Model Discovery, Multi-Account & Security #116

adrian.tkacz referenced this issue from a commit

2026-09-24 19:53:19 +00:00

feat(ux): sources page, label-first workers, provider-auth terminology and durable review gates (issues #121, #122)

kilo referenced this issue

2026-09-24 19:53:46 +00:00

Dynamic Execution Sources, Model Discovery, Multi-Account & Security (D-053, #116) #124

kilo commented

2026-09-26 17:54:42 +00:00

Author

Member

Closeout — implemented in merged PR #124 (merge commit a4370f0 into develop, head 9789c67; program #116 / D-053).

Child F delivered: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest is classified as a RESTRICTED track (openai/daybreak, security_review/restricted_access/defensive_security semantics) — discovery never proves authorization, restricted models are shown honestly in inventory but never materialized as routable resources, never substituted, and never consumed by ordinary acceptance. The durable security-review contract is recorded in AGENTS.md and docs/llm-operating-policy.md: security_critical → independent gpt-daybreak-blue-latest review required; SECURITY_REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE when access cannot be exercised; no silent substitutes; the multi-stage review stays outside the Routing Core.

Program gate record: the Daybreak review RAN through the real controlled source (three segmented passes) and returned FAIL with 8 blockers — all 8 blocker classes were remediated in the authorized pass with discriminating regressions. The final narrow verification was incomplete due to the WSLg/bubblewrap reviewer-environment failure; the owner explicitly waived that incomplete verification. It is NOT recorded as a Daybreak PASS — the review record stands as: executed, blockers found and remediated, final verification waived by the owner.

**Closeout — implemented in merged PR #124** (merge commit `a4370f0` into `develop`, head `9789c67`; program #116 / D-053). Child F delivered: `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` is classified as a RESTRICTED track (`openai/daybreak`, `security_review`/`restricted_access`/`defensive_security` semantics) — discovery never proves authorization, restricted models are shown honestly in inventory but never materialized as routable resources, never substituted, and never consumed by ordinary acceptance. The durable security-review contract is recorded in AGENTS.md and docs/llm-operating-policy.md: `security_critical` → independent `gpt-daybreak-blue-latest` review required; `SECURITY_REVIEW_UNAVAILABLE` when access cannot be exercised; no silent substitutes; the multi-stage review stays outside the Routing Core. Program gate record: the Daybreak review RAN through the real controlled source (three segmented passes) and returned FAIL with 8 blockers — all 8 blocker classes were remediated in the authorized pass with discriminating regressions. The final narrow verification was incomplete due to the WSLg/bubblewrap reviewer-environment failure; the owner explicitly waived that incomplete verification. It is NOT recorded as a Daybreak PASS — the review record stands as: executed, blockers found and remediated, final verification waived by the owner.

kilo closed this issue

2026-09-26 17:55:12 +00:00

kilo referenced this issue

2026-09-28 15:04:54 +00:00

Reuse-first reconstruction program: refreshed audit matrix (Stage A) #150